3.3 Subverting traditional mapping conventions

Subverting traditional mapping conventions challenges how we see and understand cities. Artists and activists are using new techniques to show hidden aspects of urban life, like inequality, emotions, and alternative futures.

These approaches go beyond standard maps, using art, technology, and community input to reveal different perspectives. They help us question official narratives and imagine new possibilities for our urban spaces.

Limitations of Traditional Maps

Biases in Conventional Cartography

Top images from around the web for Biases in Conventional Cartography

• 

  File:Mercator World Map.jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CULTURAL CARTOGRAPHIES OF MEDIA: (UN)CONVENTIONAL MAPPINGS: AN INTRODUCTION View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:1855 Colton Map of the World on Mercator Projection - Geographicus - WorldMercator-colton ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Mercator World Map.jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CULTURAL CARTOGRAPHIES OF MEDIA: (UN)CONVENTIONAL MAPPINGS: AN INTRODUCTION View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Biases in Conventional Cartography

• 

  File:Mercator World Map.jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CULTURAL CARTOGRAPHIES OF MEDIA: (UN)CONVENTIONAL MAPPINGS: AN INTRODUCTION View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:1855 Colton Map of the World on Mercator Projection - Geographicus - WorldMercator-colton ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Mercator World Map.jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CULTURAL CARTOGRAPHIES OF MEDIA: (UN)CONVENTIONAL MAPPINGS: AN INTRODUCTION View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Traditional mapping conventions prioritize certain perspectives and information leading to inherent biases in spatial representation
• Mercator projection distorts land mass sizes and reinforces Eurocentric worldviews while being useful for navigation
• Conventional maps emphasize political boundaries, infrastructure, and landmarks potentially overlooking social, cultural, and environmental factors
• Selection and omission of information in maps reinforces existing power structures and marginalizes certain communities or narratives
• Scale choices in traditional maps obscure local details and nuances leading to oversimplification of complex spatial relationships (city neighborhoods, rural areas)
• Standardized symbology and color schemes in conventional cartography inadequately represent diverse cultural interpretations of space
• Static nature of traditional maps limits ability to represent temporal changes and dynamic spatial phenomena (urban growth, migration patterns)

Limitations in Representation

• Two-dimensional nature of traditional maps fails to capture the full complexity of three-dimensional spaces
• Difficulty in representing overlapping or layered spatial information (underground infrastructure, airspace)
• Limited ability to depict non-physical aspects of space such as sound, smell, or emotional associations
• Challenges in representing fuzzy boundaries or gradual transitions between areas
• Inability to easily update and modify printed maps to reflect rapidly changing urban environments
• Lack of interactivity restricts user engagement and personalized exploration of spatial data
• Difficulty in representing multiple time periods or historical changes within a single map

Alternative Mapping Approaches

Inclusive Cartographic Techniques

• Counter-mapping techniques represent marginalized perspectives and challenge official cartographic representations
• Indigenous mapping practices incorporate traditional knowledge, storytelling, and non-linear spatial concepts to represent land and resources (songlines, dreamtime maps)
• Feminist cartography highlights gendered experiences of space and challenges male-dominated representations of the urban environment (safety perceptions, care work routes)
• Participatory mapping engages local communities in the mapmaking process allowing for more inclusive and diverse spatial representations
• Critical GIS approaches use geospatial technologies to analyze and visualize social inequalities and power dynamics in spatial data (redlining maps, income distribution)
• Eco-mapping focuses on representing environmental relationships and non-human actors challenging anthropocentric views of space (wildlife corridors, ecosystem interactions)
• Emotional mapping techniques capture and visualize subjective experiences and affective responses to urban environments (fear maps, happiness hotspots)

Innovative Mapping Technologies

• Digital storytelling platforms integrate maps with multimedia content to create immersive spatial narratives
• Virtual reality mapping allows users to experience and interact with three-dimensional spatial representations
• Crowdsourced mapping platforms enable collaborative creation and updating of spatial information (OpenStreetMap)
• Mobile mapping applications leverage GPS and sensor data to create real-time, location-based maps
• Big data visualization techniques incorporate large-scale spatial datasets to reveal complex urban patterns
• Augmented reality mapping overlays digital information onto real-world environments enhancing spatial understanding
• Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms generate new insights from spatial data and predict future urban trends

Subverting Cartographic Conventions

Techniques for Deconstructing Maps

• Employ scale distortion techniques to emphasize overlooked areas or de-emphasize traditionally prominent features
• Utilize unconventional symbology and color schemes to challenge familiar visual hierarchies and evoke new spatial interpretations
• Incorporate multiple perspectives and narratives within a single map to highlight the complexity and subjectivity of spatial experiences
• Experiment with non-Euclidean projections and alternative coordinate systems to challenge traditional spatial frameworks (Dymaxion map, Peirce quincuncial projection)
• Integrate temporal elements and dynamic visualizations to represent the fluid and changing nature of urban spaces
• Combine quantitative data with qualitative information, personal narratives, and artistic expressions to create multidimensional spatial representations
• Employ digital and interactive mapping technologies to allow users to manipulate and explore alternative spatial representations

Artistic and Conceptual Approaches

• Use collage techniques to juxtapose different map elements and create new spatial narratives
• Incorporate tactile or three-dimensional elements into maps to engage multiple senses
• Employ abstract or surrealist mapping styles to challenge literal interpretations of space
• Create maps based on alternative sensory experiences such as sound, smell, or touch
• Develop maps that visualize invisible networks or relationships within urban spaces (social connections, information flows)
• Use metaphorical or allegorical representations to convey complex spatial concepts
• Integrate performance or participatory elements into the map-making process

Critique of Urban Representation

Subversive Urban Mapping

• Develop maps highlighting invisible or marginalized aspects of urban life such as homeless populations, informal economies, or environmental injustices
• Create psychogeographic maps representing subjective experiences, emotional responses, and alternative pathways through the city (dérive routes, desire lines)
• Design maps visualizing power structures, surveillance networks, and zones of exclusion within urban environments
• Produce collaborative, community-based maps representing local knowledge, cultural practices, and grassroots initiatives
• Develop maps reimagining urban spaces based on alternative social, economic, or environmental priorities (car-free cities, urban food forests)
• Create speculative or fictional maps envisioning utopian or dystopian urban futures to critique current spatial arrangements
• Integrate mixed media, collage techniques, or augmented reality elements to challenge the traditional two-dimensional limitations of cartography

Critical Spatial Analysis

• Map urban gentrification processes to visualize displacement and changing neighborhood dynamics
• Create time-series maps to show historical patterns of urban development and social change
• Develop maps highlighting environmental justice issues and unequal distribution of urban resources
• Visualize digital divides and technology access within urban areas
• Map informal settlements and self-built communities to challenge official urban representations
• Create maps showing alternative transportation networks prioritizing pedestrians and cyclists
• Develop maps visualizing the impact of climate change on urban areas and vulnerable populations