7.2 Ethical use of embargoes and exclusives

Embargoes and exclusives are powerful tools in media relations, but they come with ethical considerations. These practices can shape news coverage, influencing public perception and journalistic integrity. Understanding their impact is crucial for PR professionals navigating the delicate balance between controlling information and maintaining trust.

Ethical use of embargoes and exclusives requires careful consideration of fairness, transparency, and accuracy. While they can lead to more in-depth coverage and stronger media relationships, they also risk damaging trust and limiting information access. Striking the right balance is key to responsible PR practice.

Embargoes and Exclusives in Media Relations

Definition of embargoes and exclusives

Top images from around the web for Definition of embargoes and exclusives

• 

  Chapter 3 – Public Relations Basics – The Evolving World of Public Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 3 – Public Relations Basics – The Evolving World of Public Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 3 – Public Relations Basics – The Evolving World of Public Relations : Beyond the Press ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 3 – Public Relations Basics – The Evolving World of Public Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 3 – Public Relations Basics – The Evolving World of Public Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Definition of embargoes and exclusives

• 

  Chapter 3 – Public Relations Basics – The Evolving World of Public Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 3 – Public Relations Basics – The Evolving World of Public Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 3 – Public Relations Basics – The Evolving World of Public Relations : Beyond the Press ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 3 – Public Relations Basics – The Evolving World of Public Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 3 – Public Relations Basics – The Evolving World of Public Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Embargoes involve providing information to journalists with a specific future date and time before which the information cannot be published, allowing journalists time to prepare comprehensive stories while giving the source control over the timing of the release (press releases, product launches)
• Exclusives entail offering a story or piece of information to a single media outlet before others, which can be used to reward a journalist or outlet for past coverage or to generate more in-depth, targeted coverage (interviews, data leaks)

Ethics of embargoes and exclusives

• Fairness and equal access
  • Embargoes can level the playing field by giving all journalists the same information at the same time, ensuring equal opportunity for coverage
  • Exclusives can be seen as favoritism and limit access to information, potentially disadvantaging smaller outlets or freelance journalists
• Transparency is crucial
  • Embargoes should be clearly communicated and enforced consistently to maintain trust and credibility
  • Exclusives should be disclosed to the audience to ensure transparency and avoid perceptions of bias or collusion
• Accuracy and fact-checking
  • Embargoes give journalists time to verify information and prepare accurate, well-researched stories (data analysis, expert interviews)
  • Exclusives may rush the reporting process and lead to errors or incomplete information due to time pressures and competition

Benefits vs drawbacks of exclusives

• Benefits of exclusives
  • Can lead to more in-depth, high-quality coverage due to the outlet's ability to devote more resources and attention to the story (investigative reporting, multimedia packages)
  • Builds relationships with key journalists and outlets, fostering trust and future collaboration
  • Can generate buzz and increase the impact of a story by creating a sense of exclusivity and anticipation
• Drawbacks of exclusives
  • May damage relationships with other journalists or outlets who feel slighted or left out, leading to negative coverage or loss of trust
  • Can be seen as manipulating the news agenda by handpicking outlets and shaping the narrative
  • May limit the reach and impact of the story if only one outlet has access, potentially reducing public awareness and engagement

Guidelines for embargoes and exclusives

• Use embargoes and exclusives sparingly and strategically
  1. Reserve for significant, newsworthy stories that warrant extra preparation or exclusive treatment (groundbreaking research, major policy changes)
  2. Consider the potential impact on relationships with journalists and the public, weighing the benefits against the risks
• Be transparent and consistent
  1. Clearly communicate embargo terms and enforce them fairly across all outlets to maintain credibility and trust
  2. Disclose exclusive arrangements to the audience to ensure transparency and avoid perceptions of bias
• Prioritize accuracy and fact-checking
  1. Give journalists sufficient time to verify information and prepare well-researched, accurate stories
  2. Work with reputable outlets committed to accurate, responsible reporting to minimize the risk of errors or sensationalism
• Consider the public interest
  1. Use embargoes and exclusives to serve the public good, not just the organization's interests (public health information, consumer protection)
  2. Balance the benefits of controlling the story with the need for wide dissemination of important information to keep the public informed

Ethical Considerations and Best Practices

Ethics of embargoes and exclusives

• Power dynamics can be problematic
  • Embargoes and exclusives can give sources leverage over journalists and news outlets, creating an unequal power dynamic
  • May lead to self-censorship or less critical reporting as journalists seek to maintain access and avoid jeopardizing future opportunities
• Public trust can be eroded
  • Overuse of embargoes and exclusives can erode public trust in the media, as it may be seen as a form of manipulation or collusion
  • Perception of collusion between sources and journalists can damage credibility and lead to skepticism about the independence of the press
• Journalistic independence may be compromised
  • Accepting embargoes and exclusives can compromise journalistic independence and editorial decision-making, as outlets may feel pressure to adhere to the source's agenda or framing of the story
  • Can lead to a slippery slope where journalists become reliant on exclusive access, potentially affecting their ability to report critically

Guidelines for embargoes and exclusives

• Establish clear policies
  1. Develop written guidelines for the use of embargoes and exclusives to ensure consistency and accountability
  2. Ensure all staff understand and follow the policies consistently to maintain organizational integrity and credibility
• Foster open communication
  1. Encourage dialogue between PR professionals and journalists about the use of embargoes and exclusives to build mutual understanding and trust
  2. Be open to feedback and willing to adjust practices as needed to address concerns and maintain positive relationships
• Consider alternative approaches
  1. Explore other ways to generate coverage and build relationships with journalists, such as providing newsworthy, timely, and relevant information through regular channels (press releases, media events)
  2. Focus on the newsworthiness and relevance of the information itself, rather than relying on embargoes and exclusives as a primary strategy
• Prioritize ethical principles
  1. Place the public interest, transparency, and journalistic independence at the forefront of decision-making when considering embargoes and exclusives
  2. Be willing to forgo embargoes and exclusives if they compromise ethical standards or undermine the organization's commitment to responsible communication practices (misleading information, conflicts of interest)