13.2 Adiabatic Quantum Computation

Adiabatic quantum computation uses the quantum adiabatic theorem to solve problems through slow, continuous evolution of quantum systems. It's based on keeping a system in its ground state while gradually changing the Hamiltonian, encoding the problem solution in the final ground state.

AQC differs from circuit-based quantum computing, using continuous evolution instead of discrete gates. Both harness quantum superposition and entanglement, but AQC encodes problems in Hamiltonian structures, potentially offering more robustness against certain errors.

Fundamentals of Adiabatic Quantum Computation

Principles of adiabatic quantum computation

Top images from around the web for Principles of adiabatic quantum computation

• 

  An efficient quantum algorithm for the time evolution of parameterized circuits – Quantum View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Hamiltonian Simulation by Qubitization – Quantum View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  An efficient quantum algorithm for the time evolution of parameterized circuits – Quantum View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Hamiltonian Simulation by Qubitization – Quantum View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Principles of adiabatic quantum computation

• 

  An efficient quantum algorithm for the time evolution of parameterized circuits – Quantum View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Hamiltonian Simulation by Qubitization – Quantum View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  An efficient quantum algorithm for the time evolution of parameterized circuits – Quantum View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Hamiltonian Simulation by Qubitization – Quantum View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Adiabatic quantum computation (AQC) employs quantum adiabatic theorem for problem-solving leverages slow, continuous evolution of quantum systems
• Quantum adiabatic theorem governs AQC ensures system remains in ground state during slow Hamiltonian changes
• Ground state evolution forms basis of computation encodes problem solution
• Hamiltonian engineering crucial for AQC designs initial and final Hamiltonians to represent problem and solution
• Initial Hamiltonian ($H_i$) represents simple, known ground state (often transverse field)
• Final Hamiltonian ($H_f$) encodes problem to be solved ground state corresponds to optimal solution
• Time-dependent Hamiltonian ($H(t)$) interpolates between $H_i$ and $H_f$ defines evolution path
• AQC process involves system preparation in $H_i$ ground state, gradual transformation to $H_f$, and final state measurement

Adiabatic vs circuit quantum computation

• Circuit model uses discrete gate-based approach manipulates qubits with quantum logic gates (CNOT, Hadamard)
• AQC employs continuous-time evolution avoids explicit gate operations
• Circuit model encodes problems in qubit states and gate sequences while AQC encodes in Hamiltonian structure
• Both paradigms harness quantum superposition and entanglement for computational advantage
• AQC and circuit model proven polynomially equivalent in computational power
• Circuit model more suitable for general-purpose quantum algorithms (Shor's, Grover's)
• AQC potentially more robust against certain error types (environmental noise)

Adiabatic theorem in quantum algorithms

• Adiabatic theorem states quantum system remains in instantaneous eigenstate if changed slowly enough
• Crucial condition non-zero energy gap between ground state and excited states throughout evolution
• Enables AQC to encode problem solution in final ground state
• Adiabatic condition relates evolution time to minimum energy gap: $T \gg \frac{\hbar}{\Delta E_{min}^2}$
• Impacts algorithm design creates trade-off between computation time and accuracy
• Energy gap analysis critical for AQC performance determines required evolution time

Structure of adiabatic quantum algorithms

• Problem encoding transforms computational problem into Hamiltonian form
• System initialization prepares qubits in ground state of $H_i$
• Adiabatic evolution slowly transforms system from $H_i$ to $H_f$
• Measurement extracts solution from final state
• Initial Hamiltonian ($H_i$) often uses transverse field: $H_i = -\sum_i \sigma_x^i$
• Final Hamiltonian ($H_f$) ground state represents optimal solution to problem
• Interpolation schedule defines $H(t) = (1-s(t))H_i + s(t)H_f$, where $s(t)$ increases from 0 to 1

Advantages and limitations of adiabatic computation

• Advantages include natural fit for optimization problems (traveling salesman)
• Potentially more robust against decoherence compared to circuit model
• Simpler control requirements no need for precise gate operations
• Limitations involve difficulty in maintaining coherent adiabatic evolution
• Challenges in engineering precise Hamiltonians for complex problems
• Performance heavily dependent on minimum energy gap
• Practical considerations include hardware implementation challenges and scalability issues
• Potential applications span optimization, machine learning, and quantum simulation of physical systems