4.1 Historical context and dramatic license in Richard III

Richard III blends history and drama, showcasing Shakespeare's knack for turning real events into gripping theater. The play draws from the Wars of the Roses, focusing on the last Yorkist king's rise and fall.

Shakespeare tweaks history to amp up the drama. He condenses timelines, exaggerates Richard's villainy, and adds fictional scenes. This creates a more intense story that still echoes the Tudor version of events.

Historical Inspiration for Richard III

Wars of the Roses and Key Figures

Top images from around the web for Wars of the Roses and Key Figures

• 

  Elizabeth Woodville - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Wars of the Roses - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Richard III of England - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Elizabeth Woodville - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Wars of the Roses - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Wars of the Roses and Key Figures

• 

  Elizabeth Woodville - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Wars of the Roses - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Richard III of England - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Elizabeth Woodville - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Wars of the Roses - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Wars of the Roses (1455-1487) formed historical backdrop for the play
  • Conflict between Houses of York and Lancaster for English throne
  • Spanned over three decades of political turmoil and battles
• Richard III reigned as last Yorkist king from 1483 to 1485
  • Defeated by Henry Tudor (later Henry VII) at Battle of Bosworth Field
  • Marked end of Plantagenet dynasty and beginning of Tudor rule
• Play depicts several significant historical figures
  • Edward IV, Richard's older brother and predecessor as king
  • George, Duke of Clarence, Richard's other brother and rival
  • Elizabeth Woodville, Edward IV's wife and mother of the Princes in the Tower
  • These characters shaped the political landscape of 15th-century England

Crucial Historical Events

• Mysterious disappearance of "Princes in the Tower" in 1483
  • Edward V and Richard of Shrewsbury, sons of Edward IV
  • Their fate remains a subject of historical debate and speculation
  • Forms a pivotal plot point in both history and Shakespeare's play
• Rise of Tudor dynasty began with Henry VII's ascension in 1485
  • Influenced subsequent portrayals of Richard III in historical accounts
  • Shaped literary depictions, including Shakespeare's characterization

Shakespeare's Primary Sources

• Sir Thomas More's "History of King Richard III" (c. 1513)
  • Provided detailed account of Richard's rise to power and reign
  • Established many of the negative characteristics associated with Richard
• Raphael Holinshed's "Chronicles" (1577)
  • Comprehensive history of England, Scotland, and Ireland
  • Offered broader historical context for the events of Richard's time
• These works heavily influenced Shakespeare's dramatization
  • Shaped plot elements, character portrayals, and overall narrative structure

Shakespeare's Manipulation of History

Compression and Exaggeration

• Timeline of historical events condensed for dramatic effect
  • Years of political maneuvering compressed into cohesive narrative
  • Created more intense and fast-paced storyline
• Richard III's physical deformities exaggerated
  • Historical slight curvature of spine transformed into pronounced hunchback
  • Added withered arm for increased theatrical impact
  • Served to visually represent Richard's moral corruption
• Amplification of Richard's role in various deaths
  • Increased involvement in deaths of Henry VI and his son Edward
  • Heightened perception of Richard as ruthless and ambitious villain
  • Created more direct link between Richard's actions and his rise to power

Invented Scenes and Character Alterations

• Creation of fictional scenes for dramatic tension
  • Richard's wooing of Lady Anne, widow of Prince Edward
  • Showcased Richard's manipulative skills and charisma
• Ages of certain characters altered to suit dramatic needs
  • Richard portrayed as older than his historical counterpart
  • Allowed for more seasoned and calculating characterization
• Introduction of supernatural elements
  • Prophetic dreams and ghosts absent from historical accounts
  • Enhanced play's themes of guilt, fate, and divine retribution
  • Added to the overall atmospheric and psychological tension

Simplification of Historical Complexities

• Complex political alliances simplified for narrative clarity
  • Focused on Richard's machinations and their consequences
  • Made the plot more accessible to a broader audience
• Motivations of characters streamlined
  • Emphasized personal ambitions and rivalries
  • Reduced emphasis on intricate historical context
• Historical nuances sacrificed for dramatic impact
  • Created more clear-cut heroes and villains
  • Enhanced overall theatrical experience for audiences

Richard III: Villain and Themes

Machiavellian Archetype

• Richard presented as quintessential Machiavellian villain
  • Embodies cunning, ambition, and ruthlessness in pursuit of power
  • Willing to use any means necessary to achieve his goals
• Physical deformities serve as metaphor for moral corruption
  • Reinforces theme of appearance versus reality
  • Challenges audience's perceptions of good and evil
• Richard's soliloquies and asides reveal inner thoughts
  • Allow audience to become complicit in his schemes
  • Create complex relationship between villain and viewer
  • Explore themes of manipulation and the nature of evil

Character Development and Psychological Exploration

• Portrayal of Richard as charismatic and intelligent antagonist
  • Challenges audience's moral compass
  • Explores themes of power, manipulation, and seduction
• Gradual isolation and psychological deterioration of Richard
  • Examines consequences of unchecked ambition
  • Illustrates toll of maintaining power through tyranny
• Character arc from confident schemer to paranoid ruler
  • Explores themes of guilt, conscience, and psychological impact of evil actions
  • Demonstrates the self-destructive nature of villainy

Thematic Juxtaposition and Moral Commentary

• Richard's villainy contrasted with virtues of other characters
  • Particularly Richmond (Henry Tudor) as embodiment of justice
  • Highlights themes of divine retribution and restoration of order
• Exploration of power dynamics and political maneuvering
  • Reflects on nature of leadership and governance
  • Critiques abuse of power and its effects on society
• Examination of loyalty, betrayal, and family bonds
  • Richard's actions strain relationships with allies and relatives
  • Raises questions about the limits of familial and political loyalty

Propaganda and Tudor Myth in Richard III

Tudor Myth and Divine Providence

• Tudor myth heavily influenced Shakespeare's depiction of Richard III
  • Portrayed ascension of Henry VII as act of divine providence
  • Presented Richard as tyrant whose defeat was necessary for England's salvation
• Play reinforces Tudor dynasty's legitimacy
  • Richmond (Henry Tudor) portrayed as heroic figure
  • Destined to restore peace and order to England
  • Aligns with Tudor narrative of rightful succession

Elements of Tudor Propaganda

• Emphasis on Richard's physical deformities and moral depravity
  • Justified overthrow of Yorkist king in popular imagination
  • Reinforced connection between physical and moral corruption
• Portrayal of "Princes in the Tower" incident
  • Aligned with Tudor accounts of Richard as child-murderer
  • Solidified Richard's reputation as usurper in collective memory
• Characterization of Richard as villain served Elizabethan political interests
  • Reinforced idea of Tudor rule as necessary and positive development
  • Supported Elizabeth I's reign by discrediting potential rival claims

Legacy and Historical Impact

• Play's structure mirrors Tudor narrative of history
  • Progression from chaos under Richard to order under Tudor reign
  • Culminates in Richard's defeat and Richmond's victory
• Shakespeare's dramatization became powerful tool in shaping public perception
  • Influenced view of Richard III for centuries
  • Contributed to enduring negative reputation of last Plantagenet king
• Play's popularity ensured wide dissemination of Tudor version of events
  • Blurred lines between historical fact and dramatic fiction
  • Continues to influence modern perceptions of Richard III and Tudor rise to power