Conformity and obedience studies reveal how social pressure can sway our actions. From Asch's line experiments to Milgram's shock tests, researchers uncovered surprising levels of compliance with group norms and authority figures .
These classic studies sparked debates about research ethics and human behavior. They show how easily we can be influenced by our social environment, even when it goes against our better judgment or moral values.
Asch's Line Judgment Experiments
Top images from around the web for Asch's Line Judgment Experiments Conformity and Obedience | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Group Dynamics | Boundless Sociology View original
Is this image relevant?
2.1 – Research Methods – Social Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Conformity and Obedience | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Group Dynamics | Boundless Sociology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Asch's Line Judgment Experiments Conformity and Obedience | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Group Dynamics | Boundless Sociology View original
Is this image relevant?
2.1 – Research Methods – Social Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Conformity and Obedience | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Group Dynamics | Boundless Sociology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Asch's conformity experiments investigated social pressure influence on individual judgment
Participants compared line lengths with a group of confederates
Confederates unanimously gave incorrect answers on critical trials
37% of participants conformed to the group's incorrect judgments
Factors affecting conformity included group size , task difficulty , and unanimity
Demonstrated power of social influence even in simple perceptual tasks
Revealed individual differences in susceptibility to conformity pressures
Sherif's Autokinetic Effect Study
Muzafer Sherif explored norm formation in ambiguous situations
Utilized autokinetic effect, an optical illusion of movement in a stationary light
Participants estimated distance of light movement in dark room
When tested alone, individuals developed personal norms for estimations
In groups, participants converged on a shared norm for movement estimates
Demonstrated emergence of social norms through interaction
Highlighted influence of social context on perception and judgment
Sherif's experiments extended beyond autokinetic effect studies
Robbers Cave experiment examined intergroup conflict and cooperation
Boys' summer camp setting used to create and resolve group tensions
Competitive activities fostered hostility between groups
Superordinate goals promoted cooperation and reduced conflict
Illustrated formation of group norms and stereotypes
Showed how shared goals can overcome intergroup hostility
Obedience and Power Studies
Milgram's Shock Experiments
Stanley Milgram investigated obedience to authority figures
Participants instructed to administer electric shocks to a "learner"
Shocks increased in intensity with each wrong answer
65% of participants continued to maximum voltage despite protests
Variations explored factors affecting obedience rates (proximity, legitimacy of authority )
Raised ethical concerns about research methods and participant well-being
Revealed surprising levels of obedience to destructive commands
Stanford Prison Experiment Dynamics
Philip Zimbardo conducted simulated prison study at Stanford University
Randomly assigned college students to roles of guards or prisoners
Experiment planned for two weeks but terminated after six days
Guards became increasingly authoritarian and abusive
Prisoners experienced psychological distress and learned helplessness
Demonstrated rapid emergence of toxic power dynamics
Highlighted situational influences on behavior and identity
Ethical Considerations and Critiques
Both Milgram and Zimbardo's studies faced ethical scrutiny
Concerns raised about potential psychological harm to participants
Questions about informed consent and deception in research
Zimbardo criticized for dual role as experimenter and prison superintendent
Replication attempts of Stanford Prison Experiment yielded mixed results
Debates on generalizability and ecological validity of findings
Led to stricter ethical guidelines for psychological research involving human subjects