1.1 Functionalism

Functionalism is a sociological theory that views society as an interconnected system. It examines how social institutions, like education, contribute to maintaining stability and order. This perspective emphasizes shared values, norms, and the roles of different parts of society.

The theory analyzes education's functions in transmitting culture, integrating individuals, and allocating social roles. Functionalists argue that schools socialize students, promote cohesion, and sort people into positions based on merit. However, critics say this view overlooks conflict and inequality.

Origins of functionalism

• Functionalism emerged as a major theoretical perspective in sociology in the early 20th century, seeking to understand how societies maintain stability and cohesion over time
• Draws on the analogy of society as a living organism, with each part (social institutions, norms, values) serving a specific function to maintain the overall health and stability of the system
• Developed in response to the rapid social changes of the industrial revolution and urbanization, which raised questions about how societies could maintain order and integration despite major shifts in social structure and organization

Émile Durkheim

Top images from around the web for Émile Durkheim

• 

  Émile Durkheim - Wikiquote View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Émile Durkheim – Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Emile Durkheim View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Émile Durkheim - Wikiquote View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Émile Durkheim – Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Émile Durkheim

• 

  Émile Durkheim - Wikiquote View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Émile Durkheim – Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Emile Durkheim View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Émile Durkheim - Wikiquote View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Émile Durkheim – Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• French sociologist (1858-1917) considered one of the founding fathers of functionalism
• Argued that social facts, or the norms, values, and structures of society, exist independently of individuals and exert a coercive force on their behavior
• Studied the division of labor in society, arguing that as societies become more complex and differentiated, they require new forms of social solidarity to maintain cohesion (mechanical vs. organic solidarity)
• Analyzed the social functions of religion, education, and other institutions in maintaining social order and integration

Talcott Parsons

• American sociologist (1902-1979) who developed a comprehensive functionalist theory of society, known as structural functionalism
• Argued that social systems are organized around four basic functions: adaptation (to the environment), goal attainment, integration, and latency (pattern maintenance)
• Emphasized the importance of shared values and norms in maintaining social order and stability, which he called the "central value system"
• Analyzed the role of socialization, particularly through the family and education, in transmitting shared values and norms across generations

Robert Merton

• American sociologist (1910-2003) who refined and expanded functionalist theory, introducing key concepts such as manifest and latent functions, dysfunctions, and non-functions
• Manifest functions are the intended and recognized consequences of a social practice or institution, while latent functions are the unintended and often unrecognized consequences
• Dysfunctions are the negative or undesirable consequences of a social practice or institution, while non-functions are social patterns that have no significant consequences for the larger system
• Emphasized the importance of empirical research in identifying the various functions and dysfunctions of social phenomena, rather than relying solely on theoretical assumptions

Core assumptions

• Functionalism rests on several key assumptions about the nature of society and social behavior:

Society as interconnected system

• Society is viewed as a complex system of interconnected parts (social institutions, norms, values, roles) that work together to maintain the stability and functioning of the whole
• Each part of the system serves a specific function in maintaining the overall equilibrium, and changes in one part of the system will have ripple effects throughout the entire system
• Social institutions (family, education, religion, economy, government) are analyzed in terms of their contributions to the maintenance of social order and stability

Social institutions' roles

• Social institutions are seen as playing critical roles in maintaining the functioning and stability of society as a whole
• The family serves the function of socializing children into the shared norms and values of society, and providing them with the basic skills and knowledge needed to participate in social life
• Education serves the function of transmitting culture, preparing individuals for adult roles, and allocating them into different positions in the social hierarchy
• Religion serves the function of providing a sense of meaning and purpose, reinforcing social norms and values, and promoting social cohesion and solidarity

Shared values and norms

• Functionalists emphasize the importance of shared values and norms in maintaining social order and stability
• Values are the abstract ideals that define what is desirable and worth striving for in a society (e.g. freedom, equality, individualism), while norms are the specific rules and expectations for behavior that flow from these values
• The socialization process, particularly through the family and education, is seen as critical in transmitting these shared values and norms across generations and ensuring that individuals internalize them as part of their own identity and motivations
• Social control mechanisms (e.g. laws, sanctions, peer pressure) also play a role in enforcing conformity to shared norms and values, and correcting deviant behavior that threatens social order

Manifest vs latent functions

• Manifest functions are the intended and recognized consequences of a social practice or institution, while latent functions are the unintended and often unrecognized consequences
• For example, the manifest function of education is to transmit knowledge and skills, while a latent function may be to provide childcare for working parents or to serve as a site for social networking and mate selection
• Distinguishing between manifest and latent functions allows functionalists to analyze the multiple, and sometimes contradictory, effects of social phenomena on the larger system
• Identifying latent functions can also help to explain the persistence of social practices or institutions that may seem dysfunctional or outdated from a manifest perspective

Functionalist view of education

• Functionalists analyze the education system in terms of its contributions to the maintenance of social order and stability, emphasizing its role in socialization, social integration, and role allocation

Transmission of culture

• One of the primary functions of education is to transmit the culture of a society, including its values, norms, knowledge, and skills, to the next generation
• Through the formal curriculum and hidden curriculum (implicit norms and expectations), schools socialize children into the dominant culture and teach them the skills and dispositions needed to participate in social life
• This process of cultural transmission helps to ensure continuity and stability across generations, as well as a sense of shared identity and purpose among members of a society

Social integration

• Education also serves the function of integrating individuals into the larger society and promoting social cohesion and solidarity
• By bringing together students from diverse backgrounds and exposing them to a common curriculum and set of experiences, schools help to create a sense of shared identity and values
• Extracurricular activities, such as sports teams and clubs, also provide opportunities for social bonding and the development of social skills and networks
• This process of social integration helps to reduce social tensions and conflicts, and to create a sense of unity and purpose within a society

Role allocation

• Another key function of education is to allocate individuals into different roles and positions within the social hierarchy, based on their abilities and achievements
• Through tracking, testing, and credentialing, schools sort and select students into different educational and occupational paths, which in turn shape their future life chances and social status
• This process of role allocation helps to match individuals with the roles and positions that best suit their abilities and interests, and to ensure that the most talented and capable individuals rise to positions of leadership and authority
• From a functionalist perspective, this meritocratic process helps to ensure that the most qualified individuals are placed in the most important roles, thereby contributing to the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the social system

Meritocracy

• Functionalists argue that education serves as a meritocratic institution that rewards individuals based on their abilities and achievements, rather than their social background or status
• By providing equal opportunities for all students to succeed based on their own merits, schools help to create a sense of fairness and legitimacy in the allocation of social rewards and positions
• This meritocratic ideal is seen as essential for maintaining social order and stability, as it encourages individuals to strive for success and to accept their place in the social hierarchy as a reflection of their own efforts and abilities
• However, critics argue that the meritocratic ideal is often undermined by structural inequalities and biases within the education system, which reproduce and legitimize existing social hierarchies and disadvantages

Criticisms of functionalism

• While functionalism has been a dominant theoretical perspective in sociology, it has also been subject to a range of criticisms and challenges from other perspectives

Overemphasis on consensus

• Functionalists have been criticized for overemphasizing the degree of consensus and stability in society, and for neglecting the role of conflict, power, and inequality in shaping social relations
• Critics argue that functionalists assume a level of value consensus and social integration that may not exist in reality, particularly in diverse and stratified societies
• By focusing on the ways in which social institutions and practices maintain order and stability, functionalists may overlook the ways in which they also generate tension, conflict, and change

Neglect of conflict and change

• Related to the overemphasis on consensus, functionalists have been criticized for neglecting the role of conflict and change in social life
• While functionalists recognize that societies do change over time, they tend to view change as a gradual and evolutionary process that occurs in response to external pressures or internal strains, rather than as a result of internal contradictions or conflicts
• Critics argue that functionalists underestimate the importance of social movements, revolutions, and other forms of collective action in driving social change and transformation

Justification of status quo

• Functionalists have also been criticized for providing a justification for the status quo and for legitimizing existing social inequalities and power structures
• By emphasizing the positive functions of social institutions and practices, and by viewing them as necessary for the maintenance of social order and stability, functionalists may inadvertently provide a rationale for their continued existence, even when they are oppressive or unjust
• Critics argue that functionalism serves as an ideology that supports the interests of dominant groups and legitimizes their power and privilege, while obscuring the ways in which social institutions and practices also serve to reproduce and reinforce social inequalities

Functionalism vs conflict theory

• Functionalism and conflict theory represent two major theoretical perspectives in sociology, which provide different explanations for social phenomena and the nature of social order
• Functionalism emphasizes the ways in which social institutions and practices contribute to the maintenance of social order and stability, and views society as a complex system of interconnected parts that work together to maintain equilibrium
• Conflict theory, on the other hand, emphasizes the ways in which social institutions and practices are shaped by underlying conflicts and power struggles between different groups, and views society as a site of ongoing struggle and change
• While functionalists focus on the positive functions of social institutions and practices, conflict theorists focus on their dysfunctions and the ways in which they serve to reproduce and legitimize social inequalities and power hierarchies
• Functionalists tend to view social change as a gradual and evolutionary process that occurs in response to external pressures or internal strains, while conflict theorists view it as a result of internal contradictions and collective struggles for power and resources
• Despite these differences, both functionalism and conflict theory provide valuable insights into the nature of social life and the processes that shape social relations and institutions, and both have contributed to the development of sociology as a discipline

Contemporary applications

• Despite its critics, functionalism continues to be a relevant and influential perspective in contemporary sociology, particularly in the study of education and other social institutions

Educational reform debates

• Functionalist ideas have been influential in debates over educational reform and policy, particularly in discussions of the role of education in promoting social mobility and meritocracy
• Functionalists argue that education serves an important role in allocating individuals into different social roles and positions based on their abilities and achievements, and that reforms should focus on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of this process
• However, critics argue that functionalist assumptions about the meritocratic nature of education often overlook the ways in which schools reproduce and legitimize existing social inequalities, and that reforms should focus on addressing these structural barriers to equity and opportunity

Comparative education systems

• Functionalist perspectives have also been applied to the comparative study of education systems across different societies and cultures
• By analyzing the ways in which education systems are structured and organized in different contexts, functionalists seek to understand how they contribute to the maintenance of social order and stability, and how they reflect and reinforce dominant cultural values and norms
• Comparative studies of education systems can also highlight the ways in which different societies prioritize different functions of education (e.g. cultural transmission, social integration, role allocation), and how these priorities shape educational policies and practices
• However, critics argue that functionalist analyses of education systems often overlook the ways in which they are shaped by historical, political, and economic factors, and that a more critical and contextualized approach is needed to fully understand their social significance and effects