1.2 Key legislation and policies

Special education legislation has evolved from grassroots advocacy to comprehensive federal mandates. This progression has shaped educational rights for students with disabilities, ensuring equal opportunities and protection from discrimination in schools across the United States.

Key laws like IDEA, Section 504, and the ADA form the backbone of special education policy. These regulations guarantee free appropriate public education, mandate least restrictive environments, and require schools to provide necessary accommodations and services to support students with disabilities.

History of special education legislation

• Special education legislation evolved from grassroots advocacy to federal mandates, shaping educational rights for students with disabilities
• Understanding this history provides context for current special education laws and practices in the United States
• Legislation aimed to address discrimination and ensure equal educational opportunities for all students

Early advocacy movements

Top images from around the web for Early advocacy movements

• 

  Mannréttindabarátta blökkumanna í Bandaríkjunum - Wikipedia, frjálsa alfræðiritið View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Civil Rights Movement Continues | US History II (American Yawp) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Davis Wilkins Civil Rights March 1963.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Mannréttindabarátta blökkumanna í Bandaríkjunum - Wikipedia, frjálsa alfræðiritið View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Civil Rights Movement Continues | US History II (American Yawp) View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Early advocacy movements

• 

  Mannréttindabarátta blökkumanna í Bandaríkjunum - Wikipedia, frjálsa alfræðiritið View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Civil Rights Movement Continues | US History II (American Yawp) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Davis Wilkins Civil Rights March 1963.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Mannréttindabarátta blökkumanna í Bandaríkjunum - Wikipedia, frjálsa alfræðiritið View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Civil Rights Movement Continues | US History II (American Yawp) View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Parent-led advocacy groups in the 1950s and 1960s pushed for educational rights of children with disabilities
• National Association for Retarded Children (now The Arc) founded in 1950 to support families and advocate for services
• Council for Exceptional Children established in 1922 to improve educational outcomes for gifted students and those with disabilities
• Advocacy efforts led to increased public awareness and initial state-level special education laws

Landmark court cases

• Brown v. Board of Education (1954) established that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal, laying groundwork for special education rights
• Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children (PARC) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (1971) guaranteed free public education for children with intellectual disabilities
• Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia (1972) extended right to education to all children with disabilities
• These cases set legal precedents for subsequent special education legislation and policies

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

• IDEA serves as the cornerstone of special education law in the United States, ensuring rights and protections for students with disabilities
• Originally passed in 1975 as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, renamed and expanded in subsequent reauthorizations
• Mandates that all eligible children with disabilities receive special education and related services to meet their unique needs

IDEA's six core principles

• Zero reject prohibits schools from excluding any student based on type or severity of disability
• Nondiscriminatory evaluation requires fair and accurate assessments to determine eligibility and needs
• Appropriate education mandates services tailored to meet individual student needs
• Least restrictive environment promotes inclusion with nondisabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate
• Procedural due process provides safeguards for students and families, including right to participate in decision-making
• Parental and student participation ensures involvement in educational planning and decision-making process

Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)

• Cornerstone of IDEA, guarantees education at public expense that meets individual needs
• Includes special education and related services necessary for student to benefit from education
• Must be provided in conformity with an Individualized Education Program (IEP)
• Standard for FAPE clarified by Supreme Court in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017)
  • Education must be "reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances"

Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

• Requires students with disabilities to be educated with nondisabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate
• Placement decisions based on individual needs and abilities, not solely on disability category
• Continuum of alternative placements available (general education, resource rooms, separate classes, separate schools)
• Schools must justify more restrictive placements and consider supplementary aids and services in general education
• Promotes inclusion and access to general education curriculum while still meeting individual needs

Individualized Education Program (IEP)

• Written document developed for each eligible student with a disability
• Outlines current performance levels, annual goals, special education services, and accommodations
• Developed by IEP team including parents, teachers, special educators, and student (when appropriate)
• Must be reviewed and revised at least annually to ensure ongoing appropriateness
• Serves as roadmap for student's special education program and measure of progress

Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act

• Civil rights law prohibiting discrimination based on disability in programs receiving federal funding
• Applies to all public schools and many private schools that accept federal funds
• Broader definition of disability than IDEA, covering more students who may not qualify for special education

Eligibility criteria

• Physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities
• Record of such an impairment
• Regarded as having such an impairment
• Includes conditions such as ADHD, diabetes, allergies, and temporary disabilities not covered under IDEA
• Determination made by school team based on evaluation data and impact on education

504 plans vs IEPs

• 504 plans provide accommodations and supports in general education setting
• Less formal than IEPs, typically developed by school team without same procedural requirements
• No requirement for annual goals or specialized instruction in 504 plans
• IEPs more comprehensive, including specially designed instruction and related services
• Students with 504 plans remain in general education, while IEPs may involve special education placements

Americans with Disabilities Act

• Comprehensive civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals with disabilities
• Extends protections beyond federally funded programs to private sector and state/local governments
• Impacts education through requirements for accessibility and reasonable accommodations

ADA's five titles

• Title I Employment prohibits discrimination in hiring, promotion, and workplace accommodations
• Title II Public Services mandates accessibility in state and local government services, including public schools
• Title III Public Accommodations requires accessibility in businesses and non-profit service providers
• Title IV Telecommunications ensures equal access to telephone and television services
• Title V Miscellaneous Provisions includes technical requirements and enforcement mechanisms

Reasonable accommodations in education

• Modifications or adjustments that enable equal access and participation for students with disabilities
• May include assistive technology, modified testing procedures, or changes to classroom environment
• Must not fundamentally alter nature of program or create undue burden for institution
• Interactive process between student, family, and school to determine appropriate accommodations
• Extends from K-12 to higher education settings, supporting transition to post-secondary opportunities

No Child Left Behind Act

• Signed into law in 2001, reauthorized Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965
• Aimed to improve academic achievement for all students, including those with disabilities
• Introduced standardized testing and accountability measures with significant impact on special education

Accountability measures

• Annual testing in reading and math for grades 3-8 and once in high school
• Schools required to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for all student subgroups, including students with disabilities
• Consequences for schools not meeting AYP targets, including potential restructuring
• Highly Qualified Teacher requirements extended to special education teachers

Impact on special education

• Increased inclusion of students with disabilities in state assessments and accountability systems
• Raised expectations for academic achievement of students with disabilities
• Introduced alternate assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities
• Criticized for potential negative effects on special education students (teaching to the test, narrowed curriculum)
• Led to increased data collection and reporting on academic outcomes for students with disabilities

Every Student Succeeds Act

• Signed into law in 2015, replaced No Child Left Behind Act
• Maintained focus on equity and accountability while returning more control to states and local districts
• Aimed to address criticisms of NCLB while still ensuring progress for all students, including those with disabilities

State vs federal role

• Shifted primary responsibility for developing accountability systems to states
• States required to submit plans for approval to U.S. Department of Education
• Maintained federal oversight but allowed more flexibility in implementation
• Eliminated Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements, allowing states to set own goals and interventions

Provisions for students with disabilities

• Continued requirement for inclusion of students with disabilities in state assessment systems
• Cap of 1% of students who can take alternate assessments (approximately 10% of students with disabilities)
• Emphasis on Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles in curriculum and assessment
• Requirement for states to address disproportionality in special education identification and discipline
• Promoted use of multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) and early intervening services

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act

• Federal law protecting privacy of student education records
• Applies to all schools receiving funds from U.S. Department of Education
• Balances student privacy rights with need for appropriate information sharing in educational settings

Parental rights

• Right to inspect and review student's education records
• Right to request amendment of records they believe to be inaccurate or misleading
• Right to consent to disclosures of personally identifiable information from records
• Right to file a complaint with U.S. Department of Education for alleged violations
• Rights transfer to student at age 18 or when attending post-secondary institution

Student record confidentiality

• Schools must have written permission from parent or eligible student to release records
• Exceptions include school officials with legitimate educational interest, transfer to new schools, and specified officials for audit or evaluation purposes
• Schools may disclose directory information (name, address, phone number) without consent unless parent opts out
• Special considerations for students with disabilities regarding confidentiality of special education records
• Intersection with IDEA requirements for access to and amendment of special education records

Assistive Technology Act

• Originally passed in 1988, reauthorized in 1994 and 2004
• Aims to improve provision of assistive technology to individuals with disabilities of all ages
• Supports state efforts to enhance access to and acquisition of assistive technology devices and services

Funding for assistive technology

• Provides grants to states to develop comprehensive, consumer-responsive programs
• Supports device loan programs, device demonstrations, and device reutilization programs
• Funds training and technical assistance on assistive technology
• Promotes awareness of funding sources for assistive technology (Medicaid, private insurance, special education funds)

State grant programs

• State Assistive Technology Programs required in all states and territories
• Alternative Financing Programs to help individuals purchase assistive technology
• Protection and Advocacy for Assistive Technology to provide legal support and advocacy
• National Activities include technical assistance, data collection, and research on assistive technology
• State Leadership Activities focus on training, awareness, and coordination of assistive technology services

Policy implementation challenges

• Implementing special education policies involves complex interplay of federal, state, and local systems
• Challenges arise from varying interpretations, resource constraints, and evolving educational landscape
• Ongoing efforts needed to ensure policies translate into effective practices for students with disabilities

Funding issues

• IDEA consistently underfunded by federal government, shifting burden to states and local districts
• Disparity in funding across states and districts leads to inequitable services
• High costs associated with providing specialized services and accommodations
• Tension between meeting individual student needs and managing limited resources
• Debate over efficacy and cost-effectiveness of different special education approaches

Compliance monitoring

• Federal and state oversight mechanisms to ensure adherence to special education laws
• State Performance Plans and Annual Performance Reports required under IDEA
• On-site monitoring visits and data audits to verify compliance
• Corrective action plans for districts not meeting compliance standards
• Challenges in balancing compliance requirements with focus on student outcomes
• Need for ongoing professional development to keep educators updated on policy requirements

International special education policies

• Special education approaches vary globally, influenced by cultural, economic, and political factors
• Trend towards more inclusive education policies worldwide, though implementation varies
• International agreements and conventions shape global discourse on rights of persons with disabilities

UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities

• Adopted in 2006, ratified by 182 countries as of 2021
• Article 24 focuses on right to inclusive education for persons with disabilities
• Promotes full development of human potential and sense of dignity and self-worth
• Calls for reasonable accommodations and support measures in general education systems
• Emphasizes importance of training professionals and staff who work at all levels of education

Inclusive education worldwide

• Shift from segregated special education to inclusive models in many countries
• Varies from full inclusion to continuum of placement options similar to U.S. system
• Examples of innovative practices (Finland's special support system, New Zealand's inclusive education policy)
• Challenges in low and middle-income countries (lack of resources, cultural attitudes, teacher training)
• International organizations (UNESCO, UNICEF) promoting inclusive education through research and support

Future trends in legislation

• Special education policies continue to evolve in response to research, advocacy, and societal changes
• Ongoing debates about best practices and policy directions to support students with disabilities
• Emerging technologies and educational approaches influencing future policy considerations

Emerging issues

• Increased focus on transition planning and post-secondary outcomes for students with disabilities
• Growing awareness of twice-exceptional students (gifted students with disabilities)
• Addressing needs of students with mental health challenges in educational settings
• Impact of remote and hybrid learning models on special education service delivery
• Use of artificial intelligence and adaptive technologies in special education

Proposed policy changes

• Potential reauthorization of IDEA to address current challenges and incorporate new research
• Proposals to fully fund IDEA at promised 40% federal contribution level
• Efforts to streamline IEP process and reduce administrative burden on educators
• Increased emphasis on evidence-based practices and data-driven decision making
• Exploration of competency-based education models for students with disabilities
• Continued push for greater inclusion and access to general education curriculum