5.4 Post-Interview Processing and Story Development
5 min read•july 30, 2024
After interviewing athletes and coaches, the real work begins. Reporters must sift through mountains of information, organizing key and insights. This process involves prioritizing elements that best tell the story and considering the broader context of each response.
Integrating research with interview content creates a comprehensive narrative. Reporters must also navigate ethical considerations, protecting source confidentiality while responsibly using information. Balancing these elements transforms raw interviews into compelling sports stories that captivate readers.
Organizing Interview Data
Prioritizing Key Story Elements
Top images from around the web for Prioritizing Key Story Elements
Free Image of Priority Task Concept - Folder with Label | Freebie.Photography View original
Interviews often produce a large amount of raw information that needs to be carefully reviewed, organized, and prioritized to identify the most relevant and compelling elements for the story
Key story elements may include:
Unique insights
Emotional quotes
Surprising revelations
Illustrative anecdotes
Information that advances the central narrative or theme
Prioritizing information involves weighing the relevance, credibility, and strength of each piece of information in the context of the overall story angle and purpose
The process of organizing and prioritizing is often iterative, as new information or shifting story focus may change which elements are most valuable to highlight
Techniques for Organizing Interview Material
Creating a log or transcript of the interview helps capture the full content and allows for easier review and analysis
Coding responses by topic (player injuries, team strategy, fan reactions) enables grouping related information together
Ranking the most impactful quotes or exchanges (heated confrontation between coach and referee) highlights potential focal points for the story
Comparing responses across multiple interviews reveals patterns, contrasts, or recurring themes
Chronologically ordering key events or anecdotes shared in the interview helps construct a coherent
Contextualizing Interview Responses
Analyzing Contextual Factors
Extracting the full meaning and significance from an interviewee's responses requires considering the broader context of their experience, perspective, and motivations
Contextual factors to analyze include:
Interviewee's background (long-time veteran player vs. rookie)
Role within the story (eyewitness, expert, impacted party)
Potential biases or conflicts of interest
Apparent agenda in sharing information
Identifying the emotional subtext, tone, and non-verbal cues from an interviewee can reveal deeper insights beyond the literal meaning of their words
Considering the implications, consequences, and potential impact of an interviewee's revelations can elevate the significance and weight of their inclusion in the story
Probing Deeper Meaning
Probing the "why" behind an interviewee's statements through follow-up questions or critical analysis helps uncover the core meaning and motivation behind their responses
Analyzing responses in relation to other information gathered can expose:
Patterns (repeated references to team chemistry issues)
Contrasts (differing accounts of the same incident)
Contradictions (factual inconsistencies in an interviewee's story)
Exploring these interrelationships enriches the story's nuance and complexity
Pushing beyond surface-level comments by asking interviewees to elaborate, provide examples, or respond to counterarguments elicits more substantive insights
Examining how an interviewee's statements align or conflict with their actions or other known facts tests the credibility and reliability of their account
Integrating Research and Interviews
Supplementing Interviews with Research
Interviews are rarely sufficient as a sole source of information and often require additional context, , and supplementary research to build a complete story
Background research prior to the interview prepares the reporter to ask informed questions and go deeper on key issues
Information gathered from other primary sources (public records, data analysis, eyewitness accounts) and secondary sources (news articles, expert commentary, historical documents) can:
Reinforce interviewee's account with corroborating evidence
Qualify or provide nuance to their perspective
Directly challenge or complicate ideas presented
Integrating outside information helps address gaps in the interviewee's knowledge, provide necessary context for their experiences, and construct a more authoritative, well-rounded narrative
Constructing a Comprehensive Narrative
The process of integration requires assessing how different pieces of information align or diverge and finding natural connections to weave a cohesive story
A comprehensive narrative uses interview content as a central pillar to humanize the story while building additional reporting and research around that foundation
Effective integration may involve:
Using research to set up the context before introducing an interview
Corroborating key claims from an interviewee with outside data or documents
Juxtaposing contrasting interviewee perspectives to explore nuance
Combining interview anecdotes with factual information to illustrate broader trends
The goal is to create a seamless narrative where research and interviews complement and reinforce each other to strengthen the overall reporting
Ethical Considerations in Interviewing
Responsible Use of Information
Reporters have a responsibility to consider the ethical implications of how they use information shared by sources, who may face personal, professional, or legal consequences
Ethical obligations include:
Respecting requests for confidentiality
Clearly communicating conditions or limitations on the use of information
Weighing the public's right to know against potential harms to sources
Reporters should consider a source's motives for requesting confidentiality and press for specific, justified reasons rather than blanket anonymity
Decisions to grant confidentiality must weigh the news value and credibility of the information against the constraints it places on transparency and accountability
Protecting Source Confidentiality
Confidentiality refers to an agreement not to disclose the identity of an interviewee or attribute information to them without permission
Levels of confidentiality include:
On the record: everything is attributable by name
On background: can use information but not attribute by name
Not for : can use information but not attribute to the source at all
Off the record: information is only to inform the reporter privately and cannot be published
Steps to protect confidentiality include:
Securing notes and files (encrypting devices, using anonymous accounts)
Using secure communication channels (encrypted messaging apps, burner phones)
Consulting legal counsel before publishing sensitive information
In some cases, reporters may need to find alternative ways to confirm and report information that avoids exposing a confidential source (verifying with additional on-the-record sources)
Establishing clear ground rules and informed consent with sources upfront helps avoid misunderstandings and builds trust