11.1 Freedom of Speech and Press

Freedom of speech and press are cornerstones of American democracy, protected by the First Amendment. These rights allow individuals to express ideas and media to report news without government interference, though some restrictions apply.

Courts use various tests to evaluate speech restrictions, balancing individual rights with government interests. While most speech is protected, limitations exist for obscenity, defamation, and speech that incites imminent lawless action.

Freedom of Speech and Press Protections

Constitutional Foundations and Core Freedoms

Top images from around the web for Constitutional Foundations and Core Freedoms

• 

  Freedom of the Press 9 - Prior Restraint - Redoubt News View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Freedom of Speech Includes The Press (32451481695).jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:George Washington freedom of speech quote.jpg View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Freedom of the Press 9 - Prior Restraint - Redoubt News View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Freedom of Speech Includes The Press (32451481695).jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Constitutional Foundations and Core Freedoms

• 

  Freedom of the Press 9 - Prior Restraint - Redoubt News View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Freedom of Speech Includes The Press (32451481695).jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:George Washington freedom of speech quote.jpg View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Freedom of the Press 9 - Prior Restraint - Redoubt News View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Freedom of Speech Includes The Press (32451481695).jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech and press as fundamental rights
• Freedom of speech protects individuals' right to express ideas and opinions without government interference
• Freedom of the press safeguards media outlets' ability to report news and information freely
• Prior restraint prohibits government from censoring speech or publications before they occur
• Time, place, and manner restrictions allow limited government regulation of speech under specific circumstances

Limitations and Regulations

• Content-neutral restrictions regulate speech without considering the message (noise ordinances)
• Content-based restrictions target specific types of speech, subject to strict scrutiny
• Reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions must serve significant government interest
• Restrictions must be narrowly tailored and leave open alternative channels of communication
• Government can regulate speech in limited public forums more extensively than in traditional public forums (parks, streets)

Types of Protected Speech

Expressive and Commercial Forms

• Symbolic speech communicates ideas through actions or symbols (flag burning, wearing armbands)
• Commercial speech includes advertising and promotion of products or services
• Commercial speech receives less protection than political or artistic expression
• False or misleading commercial speech can be regulated more easily
• Government can require disclaimers or factual disclosures in commercial speech

Controversial and Potentially Harmful Speech

• Obscenity lacks protection under the First Amendment, defined by the Miller Test
• Miller Test assesses whether material appeals to prurient interest, depicts sexual conduct offensively, and lacks serious value
• Libel involves false written statements that damage reputation
• Slander refers to false spoken statements that harm reputation
• Public figures face higher burden of proof in defamation cases (actual malice standard)
• Hate speech, while offensive, generally protected unless it incites imminent lawless action

Tests and Doctrines for Restricting Speech

Legal Standards for Evaluating Speech Restrictions

• Clear and present danger test evaluates whether speech poses immediate threat to public safety
• Brandenburg test assesses whether speech is directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action
• Overbreadth doctrine invalidates laws that restrict substantially more speech than necessary
• Vagueness doctrine strikes down laws that are unclear about what speech is prohibited
• Courts apply strict scrutiny to content-based restrictions, requiring compelling government interest

Balancing Free Speech and Government Interests

• Content-neutral restrictions face intermediate scrutiny, must serve substantial government interest
• Time, place, and manner restrictions must be narrowly tailored to serve government interest
• Compelling government interests can include national security, public safety, and preventing violence
• Courts weigh speakers' rights against potential harm or disruption caused by speech
• Government bears burden of proving restriction is necessary and narrowly tailored