Yield criteria and failure theories are crucial tools for predicting when materials will break or deform. They help engineers determine safe stress levels for various materials under different loading conditions, ensuring structures and components don't fail unexpectedly.
These concepts are essential in understanding how materials behave under stress. By applying yield criteria and failure theories, we can design safer, more efficient structures and products, balancing strength requirements with material properties and loading conditions.
Yield Criteria for Material Failure
Concept and Role of Yield Criteria
Top images from around the web for Concept and Role of Yield Criteria
Stress and Strain – Strength of Materials Supplement for Power Engineering View original
Is this image relevant?
12.1 Stress and Strain | Physical Geology View original
Is this image relevant?
Elasticity and Plasticity – University Physics Volume 1 View original
Is this image relevant?
Stress and Strain – Strength of Materials Supplement for Power Engineering View original
Is this image relevant?
12.1 Stress and Strain | Physical Geology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Concept and Role of Yield Criteria
Stress and Strain – Strength of Materials Supplement for Power Engineering View original
Is this image relevant?
12.1 Stress and Strain | Physical Geology View original
Is this image relevant?
Elasticity and Plasticity – University Physics Volume 1 View original
Is this image relevant?
Stress and Strain – Strength of Materials Supplement for Power Engineering View original
Is this image relevant?
12.1 Stress and Strain | Physical Geology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Yield criteria are mathematical expressions that define the stress state at which a material begins to yield or plastically deform
Used to predict the onset of material failure under various loading conditions (uniaxial, biaxial, or triaxial stress states)
The of a material is the stress level at which begins, and it is a critical material property used in yield criteria
Consider the principal stresses acting on a material and compare them to the yield strength to determine if yielding occurs
The choice of an appropriate yield criterion depends on the material properties and the specific loading conditions
Common Yield Criteria
(maximum shear stress criterion)
(maximum distortion energy criterion)
Each criterion has its own mathematical expression and assumptions based on material behavior and loading conditions
The selection of the appropriate yield criterion is crucial for accurate prediction of material failure
Tresca vs von Mises Yield Criteria
Tresca Yield Criterion
Also known as the maximum shear stress criterion
States that yielding occurs when the maximum shear stress reaches a critical value equal to half the yield strength in uniaxial tension
Expressed as: max(∣σ1−σ2∣,∣σ2−σ3∣,∣σ3−σ1∣)=σy, where σ1, σ2, and σ3 are the principal stresses, and σy is the yield strength
Suitable for materials with similar yield strengths in tension and compression (cast iron, some ceramics)
von Mises Yield Criterion
Also known as the maximum distortion energy criterion
States that yielding occurs when the distortion energy reaches a critical value
Expressed as: (σ1−σ2)2+(σ2−σ3)2+(σ3−σ1)2=2σy2, where σ1, σ2, and σ3 are the principal stresses, and σy is the yield strength
Widely used for (most metals) due to its ability to account for the combined effect of all principal stresses
Particularly suitable for materials that exhibit isotropic behavior and have similar yield strengths in tension and compression
Applying Tresca and von Mises Criteria
To apply the Tresca or von Mises yield criteria, the principal stresses acting on the material must be determined from the given stress state
The calculated principal stresses are then substituted into the respective yield criterion equation to check if the condition for yielding is met
If the yield criterion is satisfied, the material is expected to undergo plastic deformation, indicating the onset of yielding
Example: For a given stress state, if the von Mises stress exceeds the yield strength, the material will yield according to the von Mises criterion
Principal Stresses and Failure Theories
Principal Stresses
Principal stresses are the normal stresses acting on mutually perpendicular planes where the shear stresses are zero
The three principal stresses (σ1, σ2, and σ3) are ordered such that σ1≥σ2≥σ3, with σ1 being the maximum principal stress and σ3 being the minimum principal stress
Represent the most critical stress states acting on a material
The orientation of the principal stress planes can be determined using or by solving the eigenvalue problem for the stress tensor
Relationship to Failure Theories
Principal stresses are crucial in failure theories because they represent the most critical stress states acting on a material
The difference between the maximum and minimum principal stresses (σ1−σ3) is called the principal stress difference and is used in some failure theories (Tresca yield criterion)
The hydrostatic stress, defined as the average of the three principal stresses, (σ1+σ2+σ3)/3, does not contribute to material yielding or failure in most metals
Failure theories, such as the (Rankine criterion) and the , rely on principal stresses to predict material failure
Selecting Failure Theories for Materials
Factors Influencing Failure Theory Selection
Material properties (ductile, brittle, isotropic, anisotropic)
Limitations and assumptions of each failure theory
Experimental validation of the chosen theory
Failure Theories for Different Materials and Loading Conditions
Ductile materials (most metals): von Mises yield criterion
Accounts for the combined effect of all principal stresses
Suitable for materials with isotropic behavior and similar yield strengths in tension and compression
(ceramics, some polymers): Maximum normal stress criterion (Rankine criterion) or Mohr-Coulomb criterion
Maximum normal stress criterion states that failure occurs when the maximum principal stress reaches the ultimate strength of the material
Mohr-Coulomb criterion considers the effect of shear stress and normal stress on failure, suitable for materials with different strengths in tension and compression
Cyclic or fatigue loading: Specific fatigue failure theories (, )
Account for the effect of mean stress and alternating stress on fatigue life
Anisotropic materials or materials with different yield strengths in different directions: Advanced failure theories (, )
Consider the anisotropic behavior of the material
Importance of Validation
It is important to consider the limitations and assumptions of each failure theory
Validate the chosen theory with experimental data when possible
Ensure that the selected failure theory accurately predicts the material behavior under the given loading conditions