1.3 Bayes' theorem

Bayes' theorem is a powerful tool in probability theory, updating our beliefs based on new evidence. It combines prior knowledge with observed data to calculate posterior probabilities, making it essential for statistical inference and decision-making.

In stochastic processes, Bayes' theorem helps model uncertainty and update probabilities as events unfold. It's crucial for parameter estimation, hypothesis testing, and prediction in various fields, from medicine to finance and machine learning.

Definition of Bayes' theorem

• Bayes' theorem is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics that describes the probability of an event based on prior knowledge of conditions that might be related to the event
• It provides a way to update the probability of a hypothesis as more evidence or information becomes available
• Bayes' theorem is named after Reverend Thomas Bayes, an 18th-century British mathematician who first formulated the theorem

Components of Bayes' theorem

Prior probability

Top images from around the web for Prior probability

• 

  Bayesian Probability Illustration Diagram | TikZ example View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayes' theorem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayes' theorem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayesian Probability Illustration Diagram | TikZ example View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayes' theorem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Prior probability

• 

  Bayesian Probability Illustration Diagram | TikZ example View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayes' theorem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayes' theorem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayesian Probability Illustration Diagram | TikZ example View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayes' theorem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• The prior probability represents the initial belief or knowledge about the probability of an event before considering any new evidence
• It is based on previous experience, domain knowledge, or subjective judgment
• Example: The prior probability of a patient having a certain disease based on the prevalence of the disease in the population

Likelihood function

• The likelihood function quantifies the probability of observing the data given a specific hypothesis or parameter value
• It measures how well the observed data fit the assumed model or hypothesis
• Example: The likelihood of observing a specific set of symptoms given that a patient has a certain disease

Marginal likelihood

• The marginal likelihood, also known as the evidence, is the probability of observing the data under all possible hypotheses or parameter values
• It serves as a normalizing constant in Bayes' theorem, ensuring that the posterior probabilities sum up to 1
• Calculating the marginal likelihood often involves integrating over the parameter space, which can be computationally challenging

Posterior probability

• The posterior probability represents the updated belief or knowledge about the probability of an event after considering the observed evidence
• It combines the prior probability and the likelihood function using Bayes' theorem
• The posterior probability provides a way to incorporate new information and update our beliefs based on the available data
• Example: The posterior probability of a patient having a certain disease given their observed symptoms and test results

Derivation of Bayes' theorem

Law of total probability

• The law of total probability states that the probability of an event A can be calculated by summing the probabilities of A given each possible outcome of another event B, multiplied by the probability of each outcome of B
• It allows us to calculate the probability of an event by considering all possible ways in which it can occur
• The law of total probability is used in the derivation of Bayes' theorem to calculate the marginal likelihood

Conditional probability

• Conditional probability measures the probability of an event A given that another event B has occurred
• It is denoted as P(A|B) and is calculated as the probability of the intersection of events A and B divided by the probability of event B
• Bayes' theorem is derived by expressing the conditional probability P(A|B) in terms of P(B|A) using the definition of conditional probability and the law of total probability

Applications of Bayes' theorem

Parameter estimation

• Bayes' theorem is used in parameter estimation to update the probability distribution of parameters based on observed data
• It allows us to combine prior knowledge about the parameters with the likelihood of the data to obtain a posterior distribution
• Example: Estimating the probability of success in a binomial experiment based on observed successes and failures

Hypothesis testing

• Bayes' theorem is applied in hypothesis testing to compare the relative probabilities of different hypotheses given the observed data
• It provides a way to quantify the evidence in favor of one hypothesis over another
• Example: Testing the hypothesis of a new drug being effective based on clinical trial results

Prediction vs inference

• Bayes' theorem is used for both prediction and inference tasks
• In prediction, Bayes' theorem is used to estimate the probability of future events based on past observations
• In inference, Bayes' theorem is used to update the probability of hypotheses or parameter values based on observed data
• Example: Predicting the probability of a customer purchasing a product based on their demographic information (prediction) or inferring the most likely parameter values of a model given the observed data (inference)

Bayesian vs frequentist approaches

Philosophical differences

• The Bayesian approach treats probability as a measure of belief or uncertainty, allowing for the incorporation of prior knowledge
• The frequentist approach defines probability as the long-run frequency of events in repeated trials, relying solely on the observed data
• Bayesian methods consider parameters as random variables with associated probability distributions, while frequentist methods treat parameters as fixed unknown quantities

Practical implications

• Bayesian methods provide a natural way to incorporate prior information and update beliefs based on observed data
• Frequentist methods focus on the likelihood of the data given the hypothesis and rely on sampling distributions and hypothesis testing
• Bayesian methods can be computationally intensive due to the need to specify prior distributions and calculate posterior distributions
• Frequentist methods are often simpler to implement and interpret, but may have limitations in handling complex models and incorporating prior knowledge

Conjugate priors

Definition of conjugacy

• Conjugacy refers to the property where the posterior distribution belongs to the same family as the prior distribution when multiplied by the likelihood function
• When a prior distribution is conjugate to the likelihood function, the resulting posterior distribution has a closed-form expression and is easy to compute
• Conjugate priors simplify the computation of the posterior distribution and make the Bayesian inference process more tractable

Common conjugate prior distributions

• Beta-binomial conjugacy: The beta distribution is conjugate to the binomial likelihood, making it suitable for modeling binary or count data
• Gamma-Poisson conjugacy: The gamma distribution is conjugate to the Poisson likelihood, often used for modeling count data or arrival times
• Gaussian-Gaussian conjugacy: The Gaussian (normal) distribution is conjugate to itself, allowing for easy updates of the mean and variance parameters
• Dirichlet-multinomial conjugacy: The Dirichlet distribution is conjugate to the multinomial likelihood, useful for modeling categorical data or probability distributions

Bayesian inference

Credible intervals vs confidence intervals

• Credible intervals are used in Bayesian inference to quantify the uncertainty in parameter estimates or predictions
• A credible interval represents the range of values within which the parameter or prediction falls with a specified probability, given the observed data and prior beliefs
• Confidence intervals, used in frequentist inference, provide a range of values that are likely to contain the true parameter value with a certain confidence level
• Credible intervals have a direct probabilistic interpretation, while confidence intervals are based on the sampling distribution of the estimator

Highest posterior density (HPD) intervals

• Highest posterior density (HPD) intervals are a type of credible interval that represents the smallest interval containing a specified probability mass of the posterior distribution
• HPD intervals are constructed such that no point outside the interval has a higher posterior density than any point inside the interval
• HPD intervals are particularly useful when the posterior distribution is asymmetric or multimodal
• Example: A 95% HPD interval for a parameter means that the interval contains 95% of the posterior probability mass, and any point inside the interval has a higher posterior density than any point outside

Computational methods for Bayesian inference

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)

• Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are a class of algorithms used for sampling from complex posterior distributions in Bayesian inference
• MCMC methods generate a Markov chain whose stationary distribution converges to the desired posterior distribution
• MCMC allows for the estimation of posterior quantities, such as means, variances, and credible intervals, by sampling from the posterior distribution
• Example: Metropolis-Hastings algorithm and Gibbs sampling are popular MCMC methods used in Bayesian inference

Gibbs sampling

• Gibbs sampling is a specific MCMC algorithm that samples from the joint posterior distribution by iteratively sampling from the conditional distributions of each parameter given the current values of the other parameters
• It requires the ability to sample from the full conditional distributions of each parameter, which is often easier than sampling from the joint posterior directly
• Gibbs sampling is particularly useful when the full conditional distributions have a known form and are easy to sample from
• Example: In a Bayesian linear regression model, Gibbs sampling can be used to sample from the posterior distributions of the regression coefficients and the error variance

Metropolis-Hastings algorithm

• The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is a general MCMC method that generates samples from a target posterior distribution by proposing new samples and accepting or rejecting them based on an acceptance probability
• It allows for the use of proposal distributions that are different from the target distribution, making it more flexible than Gibbs sampling
• The acceptance probability is calculated based on the ratio of the posterior probabilities and the proposal probabilities of the current and proposed samples
• Example: In a Bayesian logistic regression model, the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm can be used to sample from the posterior distribution of the regression coefficients

Bayesian model selection

Bayes factors

• Bayes factors are used to compare the relative evidence for two competing models or hypotheses based on the observed data
• A Bayes factor is the ratio of the marginal likelihoods of the two models, quantifying how much more likely the data are under one model compared to the other
• Bayes factors provide a way to assess the relative support for different models while automatically penalizing more complex models
• Example: Comparing a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1) using a Bayes factor, where a Bayes factor greater than 1 indicates support for H1 over H0

Bayesian information criterion (BIC)

• The Bayesian information criterion (BIC) is a model selection criterion that balances the goodness of fit of a model with its complexity
• BIC is derived from a Bayesian perspective and approximates the logarithm of the Bayes factor when comparing models
• It penalizes models with a larger number of parameters, favoring simpler models that still provide a good fit to the data
• BIC is often used as a computationally efficient alternative to Bayes factors when comparing a large number of models
• Example: Selecting the best regression model among a set of candidate models based on their BIC values, where lower BIC indicates a better trade-off between model fit and complexity

Limitations and criticisms of Bayesian methods

Subjectivity of prior choice

• One criticism of Bayesian methods is the subjectivity involved in specifying prior distributions for parameters
• Different individuals may have different prior beliefs, leading to different posterior inferences even with the same observed data
• The choice of prior distribution can have a significant impact on the posterior results, especially when the sample size is small or the prior is informative
• To address this, sensitivity analysis can be performed to assess the robustness of the results to different prior choices, and non-informative or weakly informative priors can be used to minimize the influence of subjective beliefs

Computational complexity

• Bayesian methods often involve computationally intensive tasks, such as computing high-dimensional integrals or sampling from complex posterior distributions
• As the complexity of the model and the size of the data increase, the computational burden of Bayesian inference can become significant
• Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, while powerful, can be time-consuming and may require careful tuning and convergence diagnostics
• Approximation methods, such as variational inference or approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), have been developed to alleviate the computational burden, but they may introduce additional assumptions or approximation errors