8.2 Scaffolds for tissue engineering: design and fabrication

Scaffolds are crucial in tissue engineering, providing a temporary structure for cells to grow and form new tissue. They need to be biocompatible, biodegradable, and have the right mechanical properties to support cell growth and tissue formation.

Various materials and techniques are used to make scaffolds. Natural and synthetic polymers, ceramics, and advanced materials offer different benefits. Fabrication methods range from traditional techniques like solvent casting to cutting-edge 3D printing, each with unique advantages for creating the ideal scaffold structure.

Essential Properties of Scaffolds

Biocompatibility and Biodegradability

Top images from around the web for Biocompatibility and Biodegradability

• 

  Frontiers | Implantable and Injectable Biomaterial Scaffolds for Cancer Immunotherapy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Applications of Biocompatible Scaffold Materials in Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Tissue ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Tissue Engineering Approaches in the Design of Healthy and Pathological In Vitro ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Implantable and Injectable Biomaterial Scaffolds for Cancer Immunotherapy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Applications of Biocompatible Scaffold Materials in Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Tissue ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Biocompatibility and Biodegradability

• 

  Frontiers | Implantable and Injectable Biomaterial Scaffolds for Cancer Immunotherapy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Applications of Biocompatible Scaffold Materials in Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Tissue ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Tissue Engineering Approaches in the Design of Healthy and Pathological In Vitro ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Implantable and Injectable Biomaterial Scaffolds for Cancer Immunotherapy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Applications of Biocompatible Scaffold Materials in Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Tissue ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Biocompatibility supports cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation without eliciting adverse immune responses
• Biodegradability allows gradual replacement by newly formed tissue
  • Degradation rates match the rate of tissue regeneration
• Sterilizability prevents infection and ensures safe clinical application

Mechanical and Structural Characteristics

• Mechanical properties closely mimic those of native tissue
  • Provides appropriate support and stimuli for cell growth
• Porosity and interconnected pore structure enable cell infiltration, nutrient diffusion, and waste removal
• Surface properties influence cell attachment, spreading, and function
  • Includes topography and chemistry
• Scaffold architecture provides guidance cues for tissue organization and vascularization

Biomaterials for Scaffold Fabrication

Natural and Synthetic Polymers

• Natural polymers offer excellent biocompatibility and cell recognition sites
  • Examples include collagen, hyaluronic acid, and chitosan
  • May have limited mechanical properties and batch-to-batch variability
• Synthetic polymers provide tunable mechanical and degradation properties
  • Examples include poly(lactic acid), poly(glycolic acid), and polycaprolactone
  • May lack bioactive cues for cell interaction
• Composite materials combine different biomaterial types for synergistic properties
  • Improved mechanical strength and bioactivity

Ceramics and Advanced Materials

• Ceramics suitable for bone tissue engineering due to osteoconductivity
  • Examples include hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate
  • Can be brittle and difficult to process
• Hydrogels offer a highly hydrated environment similar to natural extracellular matrix
  • May have limited mechanical strength
• Decellularized extracellular matrix provides a natural microenvironment
  • Preserves biochemical and structural cues
  • Faces challenges in standardization and scalability
• Smart or stimuli-responsive biomaterials change properties in response to external stimuli
  • Offers dynamic control over scaffold behavior

Scaffold Fabrication Techniques

Traditional Fabrication Methods

• Solvent casting and particulate leaching create porous structures
  • Involves dissolving polymer in solvent, adding porogen particles, and leaching out porogen
• Freeze-drying (lyophilization) creates porous structures
  • Freezes polymer solution and sublimates ice crystals under vacuum
• Gas foaming utilizes high-pressure CO2 to create porous polymer scaffolds
  • Eliminates need for organic solvents
• Phase separation techniques exploit thermodynamic instability
  • Creates porous structures from polymer solutions

Advanced Fabrication Technologies

• Electrospinning creates highly porous meshes with tunable fiber orientations
  • Uses electric field to draw polymer solutions into nano- or micro-scale fibers
• 3D printing techniques enable precise control over scaffold architecture
  • Examples include fused deposition modeling and stereolithography
  • Allows customization for patient-specific applications
• Self-assembly methods utilize intrinsic properties of molecules
  • Forms organized structures, particularly useful for creating nanoscale features

Scaffold Design and Fabrication Evaluation

Scaffold Design Considerations

• Fibrous scaffolds offer high surface area-to-volume ratios
  • Mimic natural extracellular matrix structure
  • May have limited cell infiltration in dense fiber networks
• Porous foam scaffolds provide good interconnectivity and cell infiltration
  • May lack directional cues for tissue organization
• Hydrogel scaffolds offer excellent nutrient diffusion and cell encapsulation
  • May have limited mechanical strength for load-bearing applications
• Aligned scaffolds guide directional tissue growth
  • May not suit all tissue types or complex geometries

Fabrication Method Evaluation

• 3D printed scaffolds allow precise control over architecture and customization
  • May face limitations in resolution and material selection
• Microsphere-based scaffolds offer controlled release of bioactive factors
  • May have challenges in achieving uniform cell distribution
• Choice of fabrication method affects scalability, reproducibility, and clinical translation potential
  • Some techniques more amenable to large-scale production than others
• Evaluation considers factors such as cost-effectiveness, time efficiency, and compatibility with various biomaterials