3.3 Historical trends and controversies in nominations

Supreme Court nominations have shaped the Court's direction and public perception. From John Marshall's landmark appointment to recent diversity milestones, successful nominations have left lasting impacts on constitutional interpretation and representation.

Controversies in the process, like Robert Bork's rejection and Merrick Garland's blocked nomination, highlight evolving political dynamics. The Senate's role has expanded, with increased scrutiny and partisan polarization affecting modern confirmations.

Historical Context of Supreme Court Nominations

Notable Supreme Court nominations

Top images from around the web for Notable Supreme Court nominations

• 

  Category:Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Judicial Nationalism | Boundless US History View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  16.4: The Federal Court System - Social Sci LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Category:Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Judicial Nationalism | Boundless US History View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Notable Supreme Court nominations

• 

  Category:Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Judicial Nationalism | Boundless US History View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  16.4: The Federal Court System - Social Sci LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Category:Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Judicial Nationalism | Boundless US History View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Successful nominations
  • John Marshall (1801) established judicial review shaped constitutional law for centuries
  • Earl Warren (1953) led Court during civil rights era delivered landmark decisions (Brown v. Board of Education)
  • Sandra Day O'Connor (1981) first female justice broke gender barrier in highest court
• Unsuccessful nominations
  • Robert Bork (1987) rejected due to controversial views on civil rights and privacy
  • Harriet Miers (2005) withdrawn due to lack of qualifications and bipartisan opposition
  • Merrick Garland (2016) nomination blocked by Senate refusing to hold hearings in election year

Controversies in nomination process

• Ideological concerns sparked debates over potential shifts in Court's balance (Roe v. Wade)
• Qualifications and experience scrutinized leading to withdrawals (Harriet Miers)
• Political motivations influenced timing and selection of nominees (election year nominations)
• Impact on Court's legitimacy eroded public trust in judicial impartiality (Bush v. Gore)

Evolution of the Nomination Process

Senate's role in confirmations

• Early confirmations focused on basic qualifications with limited Senate involvement
• 20th century developments introduced Judiciary Committee hearings increased scrutiny
• Modern era intensified vetting and questioning of nominees following Bork nomination
• Recent trends show partisan polarization in confirmation votes elimination of filibuster for Supreme Court nominations

Landmark diversity appointments

• Thurgood Marshall (1967) first African American justice impacted civil rights jurisprudence (Brown v. Board of Education)
• Sandra Day O'Connor (1981) first female justice influenced gender equality cases (United States v. Virginia)
• Sonia Sotomayor (2009) first Hispanic justice brought diverse perspective to bench
• Ketanji Brown Jackson (2022) first Black woman justice enhanced representation in highest court
• Significance of these nominations broadened judicial perspectives inspired diverse legal professionals enhanced public trust in Court