5.3 Pattern Matching and Substitution

Pattern matching and substitution are key techniques in symbolic computation. They allow us to find and transform specific parts of expressions, which is crucial for tasks like simplification, evaluation, and solving equations.

These techniques work by searching for patterns in expressions and replacing them with new expressions. Efficient algorithms and data structures are essential for good performance, especially when dealing with large or complex expressions.

Pattern Matching and Substitution in Symbolic Computation

Pattern matching in symbolic computation

Top images from around the web for Pattern matching in symbolic computation

• 

  Symbolic Computation with Python using SymPy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Design and implementation of symbolic algorithms for the computation of generalized asymptotes ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Symbolic Computation with Python using SymPy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Design and implementation of symbolic algorithms for the computation of generalized asymptotes ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Pattern matching in symbolic computation

• 

  Symbolic Computation with Python using SymPy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Design and implementation of symbolic algorithms for the computation of generalized asymptotes ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Symbolic Computation with Python using SymPy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Design and implementation of symbolic algorithms for the computation of generalized asymptotes ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Fundamental techniques enable identification and manipulation of specific subexpressions within larger expressions
• Allow application of predefined rules to transform expressions (simplification, evaluation)
• Locate specific subexpressions matching given patterns to identify parts needing modification or transformation
• Essential for various symbolic computation tasks
  • Simplifying expressions (algebraic simplification)
  • Evaluating expressions (symbolic evaluation)
  • Solving equations (symbolic equation solving)
  • Applying rewrite rules (term rewriting systems)
• Used in many symbolic computation algorithms
  • Symbolic differentiation (derivative rules)
  • Symbolic integration (integration techniques)
  • Polynomial manipulation (polynomial algebra)
  • Theorem proving (logical inference)

Implementation of pattern matching algorithms

• Search for specific subexpressions within larger expressions to find all occurrences of patterns
• Patterns represented using various data structures
  • Trees (expression trees)
  • Graphs (expression graphs)
  • Strings (linear representations)
• Common pattern matching algorithms include:
  1. Tree pattern matching recursively traverses expression and pattern trees simultaneously, checking for matches at each node
  2. String pattern matching treats expressions and patterns as strings, using algorithms like KMP or Boyer-Moore to find occurrences
• Need to handle variables in patterns matching any subexpression, commutative operators (addition, multiplication) where operand order doesn't matter, and associative operators where operand grouping doesn't matter
• Efficient implementation crucial for performance
  • Hashing or indexing techniques to speed up search
  • Pruning search space based on constraints or heuristics

Substitution techniques for expressions

• Process of replacing matched subexpressions with new expressions based on substitution rules defining transformations
  • Rules represented as pairs: (pattern, replacement)
  • Pattern specifies subexpression to match
  • Replacement specifies new expression to substitute
• Various substitution techniques:
  1. Direct replacement substitutes matched subexpressions with replacement expressions directly
  2. Variable capture replaces variables in replacement expressions with corresponding matched subexpressions
  3. Conditional substitution applies additional conditions or constraints before performing substitutions
• Need to handle variable renaming to avoid name clashes and proper handling of bound variables (under quantifiers or in function definitions)
• Can be applied repeatedly until no more matches found (fixed-point computation)
• Efficient implementation important for performance
  • Efficient data structures like hash tables to store and lookup substitution rules
  • Incremental substitution to avoid redundant work

Efficiency of pattern matching algorithms

• Complexity and efficiency depend on factors like expression size, pattern size and complexity, and number of patterns and substitution rules
• Pattern matching algorithms have different time complexities:
  • Naive tree pattern matching: $O(mn)$, $m$ = expression size, $n$ = pattern size
  • Optimized tree pattern matching (hashing, indexing): $O(m+n)$
  • String pattern matching (KMP, Boyer-Moore): $O(m+n)$
• Substitution algorithms also have different time complexities:
  • Direct replacement: $O(m)$, $m$ = expression size
  • Variable capture: $O(mk)$, $k$ = number of variables in replacement expression
• Overall complexity depends on number of iterations or recursive calls and complexity of pattern matching and substitution operations in each iteration
• Techniques to improve efficiency include:
  1. Preprocessing expressions and patterns into canonical forms, building indexes or hash tables for faster lookup
  2. Heuristics to prune search space, avoiding unnecessary pattern matching attempts based on constraints or properties
  3. Incremental computation and caching to reuse results of previous operations and avoid redundant computations
• Analyzing complexity and efficiency helps in choosing appropriate algorithms, identifying performance bottlenecks and optimization opportunities, and designing efficient data structures and representations