13.1 Ethical Frameworks in Communication

Ethical frameworks shape how we approach communication dilemmas. From utilitarianism to virtue ethics, these theories offer different lenses for evaluating right and wrong. Understanding these frameworks helps us navigate tricky situations and make better choices.

Professional ethics and codes of conduct provide practical guidelines for ethical communication. By balancing competing principles and considering social contracts, we can resolve conflicts and uphold ethical standards in our personal and professional lives.

Ethical Theories

Consequentialist Frameworks

Top images from around the web for Consequentialist Frameworks

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Theories of Human Development | Boundless Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Communicating Ethically | Communication for Professionals View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Theories of Human Development | Boundless Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Consequentialist Frameworks

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Theories of Human Development | Boundless Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Communicating Ethically | Communication for Professionals View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Theories of Human Development | Boundless Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Utilitarianism holds that the most ethical action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people
  • Focuses on the consequences of actions rather than the actions themselves
  • An action is considered morally right if it brings about the greatest good for the greatest number (the principle of utility)
  • Challenges include difficulty in accurately predicting consequences and potential for ignoring individual rights in favor of the majority

Deontological Frameworks

• Deontology emphasizes adherence to moral rules or duties, regardless of the consequences
  • Asserts that certain actions are inherently right or wrong based on moral principles (categorical imperative)
  • Philosopher Immanuel Kant argued that moral actions should be based on universal moral laws that respect human dignity (humanity as an end in itself)
  • Criticisms include rigidity in the face of complex situations and potential conflicts between competing duties

Character-Based Frameworks

• Virtue ethics focuses on the moral character of the individual rather than rules or consequences
  • Emphasizes the cultivation of virtuous character traits such as compassion, integrity, and courage
  • Argues that a person with good character will naturally make ethical decisions in various situations
  • Challenges include defining and measuring virtues across cultures and lack of clear action guidance in specific scenarios

Relativist Frameworks

• Ethical relativism holds that moral standards are relative to individual or cultural beliefs and practices
  • Descriptive relativism observes that moral beliefs and practices vary across individuals and societies (cultural relativism)
  • Normative relativism asserts that there are no universal moral truths and that right and wrong are determined by social or individual norms
  • Criticisms include the potential for moral nihilism and difficulty in resolving moral disagreements between individuals or cultures

Universalist Frameworks

• Moral absolutism asserts that there are universal, objective moral truths that hold across all individuals and cultures
  • Certain actions, such as murder or theft, are considered inherently wrong regardless of context
  • Moral absolutists often appeal to divine commands (religious ethics) or self-evident truths (moral realism) as the basis for universal moral standards
  • Challenges include accounting for moral diversity and addressing complex situations where moral absolutes may conflict

Ethical Principles and Concepts

Balancing Principles

• The golden mean, derived from Aristotelian virtue ethics, emphasizes finding a balanced middle ground between extremes
  • Encourages avoiding excess and deficiency in moral behavior (courage as the mean between cowardice and recklessness)
  • Seeks to find a moderate path that harmonizes competing principles or virtues in a given situation
  • Challenges include determining the appropriate mean in complex scenarios and balancing short-term and long-term considerations

Social Contract Frameworks

• Social contract theory holds that moral and political obligations are derived from a hypothetical agreement between individuals in a society
  • Philosophers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau argued that individuals implicitly agree to give up certain freedoms in exchange for the benefits of living in a stable society
  • The social contract establishes the rights and responsibilities of citizens and the legitimate authority of governments
  • Criticisms include the hypothetical nature of the contract and potential for justifying unjust social arrangements

Navigating Moral Conflicts

• An ethical dilemma is a situation in which an individual faces a choice between two or more morally problematic options
  • Often involves conflicts between competing moral principles, duties, or consequences (lying to protect someone from harm)
  • Ethical decision-making frameworks, such as utilitarianism or deontology, can be applied to analyze and resolve dilemmas
  • Challenges include weighing different moral considerations, predicting consequences, and accepting moral responsibility for difficult choices

Professional Ethics

• Professional codes of ethics are formal guidelines that outline the ethical responsibilities and standards of conduct within a particular profession
  • Serve to establish trust between professionals and the public by holding members accountable to shared moral principles (medical ethics, journalistic ethics)
  • Provide guidance for navigating common ethical issues and dilemmas encountered in professional practice
  • Criticisms include the potential for codes to be vague, internally inconsistent, or misused to protect professional interests over public welfare