10.2 The impact of EU law on the UK legal system

The EU's legal framework profoundly shaped the UK's legal system for decades. EU law took precedence over national law in many areas, challenging traditional notions of parliamentary sovereignty and reshaping how UK courts interpreted and applied the law.

Brexit ended the supremacy of EU law, but its impact lingers. The UK must now navigate the complex task of managing retained EU law, balancing the desire for regulatory autonomy with the need for continued alignment in certain areas for trade and cooperation.

Supremacy of EU Law

Establishment and Legal Basis

Top images from around the web for Establishment and Legal Basis

• 

  File:Diagram of the court system of England and Wales 2014.svg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  European Communities Act 1972 (UK) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  How a new European law is made - phivos.eu View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Diagram of the court system of England and Wales 2014.svg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  European Communities Act 1972 (UK) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Establishment and Legal Basis

• 

  File:Diagram of the court system of England and Wales 2014.svg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  European Communities Act 1972 (UK) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  How a new European law is made - phivos.eu View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Diagram of the court system of England and Wales 2014.svg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  European Communities Act 1972 (UK) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Principle of supremacy establishes EU law precedence over national law in EU competence areas
• European Court of Justice established supremacy through landmark cases (Costa v ENEL 1964, Factortame 1990)
• European Communities Act 1972 incorporated supremacy principle into UK domestic law
  • Required UK courts to follow EU law and European Court of Justice rulings
  • Empowered UK courts to disapply conflicting national law (primary legislation, secondary legislation, common law)

Impact on UK Legal System

• Limited Parliament's ability to legislate contrary to EU law in areas of EU competence
  • Challenged traditional notion of parliamentary sovereignty
  • Created a hierarchy where EU law stood above UK law in certain areas
• Required UK courts to interpret national law in light of EU law objectives
  • Developed principle of indirect effect (interpreting national law to align with EU directives)
• Allowed individuals to rely on EU law rights in UK courts (direct effect)
  • Vertical direct effect against state bodies
  • Horizontal direct effect in certain cases between private parties

Post-Brexit Changes

• European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 ended supremacy of EU law in UK
  • Retained much EU law as domestic law for legal continuity
  • UK Parliament now free to modify or repeal retained EU law
• UK courts no longer bound by new decisions of the European Court of Justice
  • Can diverge from pre-Brexit case law with caution
• Challenge of managing retained EU law and potential divergence over time

Incorporating EU Directives

Transposition Process

• EU directives set goals for member states, leaving implementation method to national authorities
• UK government typically used secondary legislation for transposition
  • Utilized powers granted by European Communities Act 1972 or other enabling Acts
• Process involved stakeholder consultation and impact assessments
  • Determined most appropriate implementation method within UK legal framework
• Transposition deadlines set by directives
  • Failure to implement correctly or on time risked infringement proceedings

Direct Effect and Implementation Challenges

• Principle of direct effect allowed individuals to rely on certain directive provisions in national courts
  • Applied when directives not properly implemented
  • Required provisions to be sufficiently clear, precise, and unconditional
• Challenges in ensuring timely and accurate transposition
  • Complexity of aligning directive objectives with existing UK legal structures
  • Balancing EU requirements with national interests and legal traditions

Post-Brexit Implications

• UK no longer required to implement new EU directives
• Retained EU law (including transposed directives) continues to have effect
  • UK Parliament can now modify or repeal without EU constraints
• Challenge of managing divergence between UK and EU law over time
  • Balancing regulatory alignment for trade with desire for autonomy

EU Court of Justice's Role

Jurisdiction and Functions

• Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ensured consistent EU law interpretation across member states
• Preliminary reference procedure allowed national courts to refer EU law questions to CJEU
  • Promoted uniform application of EU law across member states
• CJEU judgments binding on all member states and their courts
  • Significantly influenced UK legal system development and application

Key Legal Principles Development

• CJEU crucial in developing fundamental EU law principles
  • Direct effect (Van Gend en Loos 1963)
  • State liability (Francovich 1991)
• Court interpretations led to changes in UK legislation and legal practice
  • Employment law (Working Time Directive cases)
  • Consumer protection (Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Directive interpretations)
  • Environmental regulations (Waste Framework Directive cases)

Post-Brexit Relationship

• UK courts no longer bound by new CJEU decisions
• Retained EU law interpreted in accordance with pre-Brexit CJEU case law
  • Can be modified by UK legislation or higher courts
• Challenge of managing divergence between UK and EU legal interpretations over time

Harmonizing UK Law vs EU Regulations

Benefits of Harmonization

• Greater legal consistency across Europe facilitated trade and cooperation
  • Reduced barriers to cross-border business activities
  • Simplified compliance for companies operating in multiple EU countries
• Enhanced protections in key areas
  • Consumer rights (Consumer Rights Directive)
  • Workers' rights (Working Time Directive)
  • Environmental standards (REACH regulations)
• Facilitated free movement within EU
  • Goods (product standards harmonization)
  • Services (mutual recognition of qualifications)
  • Capital (financial services regulations)
  • People (freedom of movement rules)

Challenges and Tensions

• Harmonization created tensions between EU objectives and UK legal traditions
  • Common law system sometimes clashed with civil law-based EU regulations
  • Sovereignty concerns over EU's growing influence on domestic law
• Increased bureaucracy and compliance costs for UK businesses
  • Particularly burdensome for small and medium-sized enterprises
  • Examples: GDPR implementation, CE marking requirements
• Balancing regulatory alignment with desire for autonomy
  • Trade-offs between market access and ability to set independent standards

Post-Brexit Considerations

• UK faces challenge of balancing regulatory alignment with EU against regulatory autonomy
  • Alignment necessary for continued market access (financial services equivalence)
  • Divergence desired in some areas for competitive advantage or policy preferences
• Retention of EU law presents ongoing interpretation and modification challenges
  • Managing potential divergence from EU standards over time
  • Balancing legal continuity with desire for reform in certain areas