UK Constitution and Government

🇬🇧UK Constitution and Government Unit 12 – Comparative Constitutionalism

Comparative constitutionalism examines different systems of government and their foundational principles. This unit explores key concepts like rule of law, separation of powers, and rights protection across various constitutional models. The UK's uncodified constitution is contrasted with codified systems, highlighting its unique features like parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional conventions. Historical developments and recent reforms are analyzed to understand the evolving nature of the UK's constitutional framework.

Key Constitutional Concepts

  • Constitutionalism establishes the principles and rules that govern the exercise of state power and protect citizens' rights
  • Rule of law ensures that all individuals and institutions, including the government, are subject to and accountable under the law
  • Parliamentary sovereignty grants the UK Parliament the supreme legal authority to create, amend, or repeal any law without being constrained by a codified constitution
    • Dicey's doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty states that no person or body, including the courts, can override or set aside an Act of Parliament
  • Conventions are unwritten practices, customs, and norms that play a crucial role in the UK's uncodified constitution
    • Constitutional conventions (Cabinet collective responsibility) shape the behavior and decision-making processes of political actors
  • Separation of powers divides state power among the executive, legislature, and judiciary to prevent concentration of power and ensure checks and balances
  • Judicial review empowers courts to assess the legality of executive actions and the compatibility of legislation with constitutional principles or human rights

Historical Context

  • The UK's constitutional development has been shaped by a gradual evolution spanning centuries, rather than a single defining moment or document
  • The Magna Carta (1215) established the principle that the monarch's power is subject to the law and laid the foundation for the rule of law
  • The Bill of Rights (1689) affirmed the supremacy of Parliament over the monarch and enshrined certain civil liberties
    • Prohibited the monarch from suspending or dispensing with laws without Parliament's consent
    • Guaranteed free speech in Parliament and the right to petition the monarch without fear of retribution
  • The Act of Settlement (1701) established the independence of the judiciary by ensuring judges' tenure during good behavior and preventing their removal by the executive
  • The Reform Acts of the 19th century (1832, 1867, 1884) gradually expanded the franchise and made Parliament more representative of the population
  • The Parliament Acts (1911 and 1949) limited the power of the House of Lords and affirmed the primacy of the House of Commons in the legislative process

UK Constitutional Framework

  • The UK has an uncodified constitution, meaning its constitutional rules and principles are not contained within a single, written document
  • The constitution is derived from various sources, including statutes, common law, conventions, and works of authority
    • Statutes (Human Rights Act 1998) are laws passed by Parliament that form part of the constitutional framework
    • Common law (rule of law) consists of legal principles developed by judges through court decisions over time
    • Works of authority (Dicey's Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution) provide influential interpretations and analyses of constitutional principles
  • The UK's constitutional arrangement is characterized by a fusion of powers, where the executive and legislative branches are closely intertwined
    • The Prime Minister and most Cabinet members are drawn from the majority party in the House of Commons
  • The monarchy plays a largely ceremonial role, with the Queen acting as the head of state and symbolizing the unity of the nation
  • Devolution has transferred certain powers to the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Parliament, and Northern Ireland Assembly, creating a quasi-federal system

Comparative Models

  • Presidential systems (United States) feature a strict separation of powers, with the president directly elected by the people and serving as both head of state and head of government
    • The president has a fixed term and can only be removed through impeachment for serious misconduct
  • Semi-presidential systems (France) combine elements of both presidential and parliamentary systems
    • The president is directly elected and holds significant powers, while the prime minister is responsible to the legislature
  • Federal systems (Germany) divide power between a central government and constituent states or regions, each with their own constitutionally guaranteed powers
    • The division of powers is typically enshrined in a written constitution
  • Unitary systems (UK) concentrate power in the central government, with any powers exercised by regional or local governments being delegated from the center
  • Codified constitutions (United States, Germany) are single, written documents that comprehensively set out the structure, powers, and limits of government institutions
    • Codified constitutions are often entrenched, requiring special amendment procedures

Rights and Liberties

  • The UK has traditionally relied on the common law, conventions, and specific statutes to protect individual rights and liberties
  • The Human Rights Act 1998 incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into UK law, providing a statutory basis for the protection of human rights
    • The Act requires public authorities to act in a way compatible with Convention rights
    • Courts can issue a declaration of incompatibility if they find that a statute is incompatible with Convention rights
  • The ECHR enshrines fundamental rights and freedoms (right to life, prohibition of torture, right to a fair trial)
  • The UK has a negative conception of rights, emphasizing the absence of state interference rather than positive obligations on the state to provide for certain rights
  • The principle of legality presumes that Parliament does not intend to interfere with fundamental rights unless it expresses such an intention in clear and unambiguous language
  • The common law has developed principles (natural justice) to protect individual rights and ensure fairness in administrative decision-making

Separation of Powers

  • The separation of powers doctrine aims to prevent the concentration of power by dividing state functions among the executive, legislature, and judiciary
  • In the UK, the separation of powers is not strictly observed due to the fusion of the executive and legislative branches
    • The executive (Prime Minister and Cabinet) is drawn from and accountable to the legislature (House of Commons)
  • The judiciary maintains independence from the other branches through the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, which established the Supreme Court and the Judicial Appointments Commission
    • Judges are appointed based on merit and cannot be removed except for serious misconduct
  • The judiciary's role in upholding the rule of law and protecting individual rights has expanded through the Human Rights Act 1998 and the development of judicial review
  • The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty limits the extent to which the judiciary can challenge the validity of legislation
    • Judges can interpret statutes in a way compatible with fundamental rights, but cannot strike down Acts of Parliament

Constitutional Reform

  • The UK's constitution has undergone significant reforms in recent decades to modernize and democratize the political system
  • The House of Lords Act 1999 removed most hereditary peers from the upper chamber, making it more representative and accountable
  • Devolution (Scotland Act 1998, Government of Wales Act 1998, Northern Ireland Act 1998) has transferred powers to regional assemblies, recognizing the distinct identities and interests of the UK's constituent nations
    • The Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Parliament have legislative competence over devolved matters (education, health)
  • The Human Rights Act 1998 has strengthened the protection of individual rights and provided a basis for challenging executive actions and legislation
  • The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 enhanced the independence of the judiciary by establishing the Supreme Court and reforming the judicial appointments process
  • The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 set fixed five-year terms for the House of Commons, removing the Prime Minister's power to call an early election at will
    • The Act was repealed in 2022, restoring the prerogative power to dissolve Parliament

Contemporary Challenges

  • Brexit has posed significant constitutional challenges, raising questions about parliamentary sovereignty, devolution, and the UK's relationship with international law
    • The Miller cases (2017 and 2019) affirmed Parliament's role in triggering and implementing the withdrawal process
    • The UK's departure from the EU has implications for the devolution settlements and the distribution of powers between Westminster and the devolved administrations
  • The growth of executive power, particularly in the context of emergency legislation and the COVID-19 pandemic, has raised concerns about the balance between the branches of government
    • The Coronavirus Act 2020 granted the government wide-ranging powers to respond to the public health crisis
  • Calls for further devolution and potential independence referendums (Scotland) challenge the UK's constitutional unity
  • The role of the judiciary in constitutional matters has come under scrutiny, with some accusing judges of political activism and undermining parliamentary sovereignty
    • The government has proposed reforms to judicial review to maintain the balance between the judiciary, executive, and legislature
  • The increasing use of referendums (Brexit, Scottish independence) as a means of making major constitutional decisions raises questions about the relationship between direct and representative democracy
  • Proposals for a codified constitution or a Bill of Rights aim to provide greater clarity, coherence, and protection for constitutional principles and individual rights


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.