1.2 How Do Philosophers Arrive at Truth?

Philosophical methods help us uncover truth through logical reasoning, conceptual analysis, thought experiments, and empirical observation. These tools allow philosophers to examine complex ideas, test intuitions, and build sound arguments to explore fundamental questions about reality and knowledge.

Different philosophical positions often involve trade-offs between competing intuitions, theoretical virtues, and practical considerations. Balancing these factors requires careful analysis and reflection to develop robust theories that can withstand scrutiny and provide meaningful insights into the nature of existence and understanding.

Philosophical Methods for Investigating Truth

Methods for investigating truth

Top images from around the web for Methods for investigating truth

• 

  Why Is Research Important? | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical reasoning - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  9.7: Inductive and Deductive Reasoning - Humanities LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Why Is Research Important? | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical reasoning - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Methods for investigating truth

• 

  Why Is Research Important? | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical reasoning - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  9.7: Inductive and Deductive Reasoning - Humanities LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Why Is Research Important? | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical reasoning - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Logical reasoning involves drawing conclusions from premises through deductive reasoning (if premises are true, conclusion must be true) and inductive reasoning (making inferences based on observations or evidence)
• Conceptual analysis clarifies and defines key concepts and terms by examining necessary and sufficient conditions for concepts to apply
• Thought experiments are hypothetical scenarios used to test intuitions and explore implications of ideas (Trolley problem, brain in a vat)
• Empirical observation uses sensory experience and scientific evidence to inform philosophical arguments, particularly in areas like philosophy of mind and philosophy of science
  • Empiricism emphasizes the importance of sensory experience and observation in acquiring knowledge

Logical reasoning in philosophy

• Valid arguments are where if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true ($P \rightarrow Q; P; \therefore Q$)
• Sound arguments are valid arguments with true premises, ensuring the conclusion is true
• Identifying logical fallacies helps recognize errors in reasoning that undermine the validity of an argument (ad hominem, straw man, appeal to authority)

Tools of conceptual analysis

• Conceptual analysis breaks down complex concepts into simpler components and examines relationships between concepts by identifying necessary and sufficient conditions
• Intuition refers to immediate, seemingly self-evident judgments or beliefs used to evaluate thought experiments and test philosophical theories, although intuitions can vary between individuals and cultures
• Reflective equilibrium balances and adjusts intuitions and philosophical principles for coherence, revising beliefs when faced with compelling arguments or evidence

Approaches to knowledge and truth

• Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature, sources, and limits of knowledge
• Rationalism emphasizes the role of reason and innate ideas in acquiring knowledge
• Pragmatism evaluates the truth of ideas based on their practical consequences and usefulness
• Skepticism questions the possibility of certain knowledge and challenges the foundations of belief
• Falsification proposes that scientific theories should be testable and potentially proven false

Philosophical Positions and Trade-Offs

Trade-offs in philosophical positions

• Conflicting intuitions arise when philosophical positions have to balance competing intuitions (utilitarianism maximizes overall well-being but may violate individual rights)
• Theoretical virtues like simplicity, explanatory power, coherence, and parsimony are rarely all exemplified in a single theory, necessitating trade-offs
• Scope and specificity involve a trade-off between broad, general theories and narrow, specific accounts in terms of applicability and precision
• Ideal theory assumes perfect compliance and favorable conditions, while non-ideal theory accounts for real-world constraints and limitations, trading off between theoretical purity and practical relevance