1.5 Flynn's taxonomy of parallel architectures

Flynn's taxonomy classifies parallel computer architectures based on instruction and data streams. It defines four categories: SISD, SIMD, MISD, and MIMD, providing a framework for understanding different approaches to parallel processing.

This classification system helps designers and programmers match algorithms to appropriate architectures. While it has limitations, Flynn's taxonomy remains a foundational concept in parallel computing, guiding the development of efficient parallel algorithms and programming models.

Flynn's taxonomy overview

• Flynn's taxonomy is a classification system for parallel computer architectures proposed by Michael J. Flynn in 1966
• Categorizes architectures based on the number of concurrent instruction streams and data streams
• Provides a high-level framework for understanding and comparing different parallel processing approaches
• Helps in identifying the level and type of parallelism that can be exploited in a given architecture
• Serves as a foundation for designing parallel algorithms and programming models tailored to specific architectures

Four main classifications

Top images from around the web for Four main classifications

• 

  Taxonomia Flynn [CS Open CourseWare] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Flynn's taxonomy - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Flynn's taxonomy - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Taxonomia Flynn [CS Open CourseWare] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Flynn's taxonomy - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Four main classifications

• 

  Taxonomia Flynn [CS Open CourseWare] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Flynn's taxonomy - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Flynn's taxonomy - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Taxonomia Flynn [CS Open CourseWare] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Flynn's taxonomy - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Single Instruction, Single Data (SISD)
• Single Instruction, Multiple Data (SIMD)
• Multiple Instruction, Single Data (MISD)
• Multiple Instruction, Multiple Data (MIMD)

Based on instruction and data streams

• Instruction stream refers to the sequence of instructions executed by the processor(s)
• Data stream refers to the data operated on by the instructions
• The combination of instruction and data streams determines the level and type of parallelism in the architecture

Single instruction, single data (SISD)

• Represents the traditional sequential computing model
• Consists of a single processing element executing a single instruction stream on a single data stream
• Follows the von Neumann architecture, where instructions are executed sequentially one at a time

Traditional sequential computers

• Examples include single-core CPUs and microcontrollers
• Program counter keeps track of the current instruction being executed
• Instructions are fetched, decoded, and executed in a sequential manner

Single processing element

• SISD systems have a single processing unit responsible for executing instructions
• The processing unit can be a CPU, microprocessor, or a single core in a multi-core processor

No parallelism

• SISD architectures do not exploit any form of parallelism
• Instructions are executed sequentially, one after another
• Performance is limited by the speed of the single processing element and the efficiency of the sequential algorithms

Single instruction, multiple data (SIMD)

• Consists of a single processing element that executes the same instruction on multiple data elements simultaneously
• Exploits data-level parallelism by applying the same operation to multiple data points in parallel
• Suitable for applications with regular and uniform data structures, such as vector and matrix operations

Array processors and GPUs

• SIMD architectures are commonly found in array processors and graphics processing units (GPUs)
• Array processors are designed to perform parallel operations on large arrays of data (vector processors)
• GPUs utilize SIMD parallelism to efficiently process graphics and other data-parallel workloads

Single instruction executed on multiple data sets

• In SIMD, a single instruction is fetched and decoded by the control unit
• The same instruction is then broadcast to multiple processing elements (PEs) or lanes
• Each PE operates on a different data element from the input data stream

Data-level parallelism

• SIMD architectures exploit data-level parallelism by performing the same operation on multiple data elements in parallel
• Enables efficient processing of large datasets and improves performance for data-intensive applications (image processing, scientific simulations)

Multiple instruction, single data (MISD)

• Consists of multiple processing elements executing different instructions on the same data stream
• Each processing element operates independently, executing its own instruction stream
• Rarely used in practice due to limited applicability and efficiency

Uncommon architecture

• MISD is not a commonly encountered architecture in modern computing systems
• Few practical examples of MISD systems exist, as the architecture has limited use cases

Multiple instructions operate on single data stream

• In MISD, multiple processing elements execute different instructions on the same data stream
• Each processing element has its own instruction stream, but they all operate on the same input data

Fault tolerance and redundancy

• MISD architectures can be used for fault tolerance and redundancy purposes
• Multiple processing elements can perform the same computation on the same data and compare results for error detection and correction (space shuttle flight control systems)

Multiple instruction, multiple data (MIMD)

• Consists of multiple processing elements, each executing its own instruction stream on its own data stream
• Provides the highest level of parallelism and flexibility among Flynn's classifications
• Suitable for a wide range of parallel applications and algorithms

Most common parallel architecture

• MIMD is the most prevalent parallel architecture in modern computing systems
• Examples include multi-core CPUs, distributed systems, and clusters of independent processors

Multiple processors executing different instructions on different data

• In MIMD, each processing element has its own control unit and can execute different instructions independently
• Each processing element operates on its own data stream, allowing for task-level and data-level parallelism

Task-level and data-level parallelism

• MIMD architectures can exploit both task-level parallelism and data-level parallelism
• Task-level parallelism involves distributing different tasks or functions across multiple processing elements (web server handling multiple client requests)
• Data-level parallelism involves partitioning the data and processing each partition independently on different processing elements (parallel matrix multiplication)

Limitations of Flynn's taxonomy

• While Flynn's taxonomy provides a useful classification of parallel architectures, it has some limitations and drawbacks
• The taxonomy is based on a high-level view of instruction and data streams and does not capture all the nuances of modern parallel systems

Coarse-grained classification

• Flynn's taxonomy offers a coarse-grained classification of parallel architectures
• It does not provide detailed insights into the specific features and characteristics of different parallel systems
• The taxonomy does not consider factors such as memory hierarchy, interconnect topology, or synchronization mechanisms

Doesn't capture all modern architectures

• Flynn's taxonomy was proposed in 1966 and may not adequately represent all modern parallel architectures
• The taxonomy does not capture hybrid architectures that combine multiple parallel processing paradigms (CPU-GPU heterogeneous systems)
• Emerging architectures, such as neuromorphic computing or quantum computing, do not fit neatly into Flynn's classifications

Extensions and refinements proposed

• Several extensions and refinements to Flynn's taxonomy have been proposed to address its limitations
• Johnson's taxonomy introduces additional categories, such as Multiple SIMD (MSIMD) and Multiple MIMD (MMIMD), to capture more complex parallel architectures
• Other taxonomies, such as the Feng's taxonomy or the Skillicorn's taxonomy, consider additional dimensions and characteristics of parallel systems

Impact on parallel programming

• Flynn's taxonomy has significant implications for parallel programming and the design of parallel algorithms
• Understanding the characteristics of different parallel architectures helps in selecting appropriate programming models and optimization techniques

Matching algorithms to architectures

• Parallel algorithms and programming models should be designed to match the characteristics of the target parallel architecture
• SIMD architectures are well-suited for data-parallel algorithms that perform the same operation on multiple data elements (vector addition)
• MIMD architectures are suitable for task-parallel algorithms that distribute different tasks across multiple processing elements (parallel search algorithms)

Exploiting available parallelism

• Parallel programming aims to exploit the available parallelism in the target architecture to maximize performance
• For SIMD architectures, parallelism is exploited by vectorizing the code and utilizing SIMD instructions (SSE, AVX)
• For MIMD architectures, parallelism is exploited by distributing tasks or data across multiple processing elements and managing synchronization and communication (OpenMP, MPI)

Considerations for performance optimization

• Performance optimization in parallel programming depends on the characteristics of the parallel architecture
• SIMD architectures benefit from data layout optimizations, such as array-of-structures (AoS) to structure-of-arrays (SoA) transformations, to improve memory access patterns
• MIMD architectures require careful management of data partitioning, load balancing, and communication overhead to achieve optimal performance
• Cache coherence, memory consistency, and synchronization mechanisms should be considered when optimizing parallel programs for MIMD architectures