First-order languages are the building blocks of model theory. They use symbols and rules to create precise mathematical statements, allowing us to express complex ideas in a structured way. It's like learning a new language, but for math!
Understanding the syntax and semantics of these languages is crucial. Syntax tells us how to form valid expressions, while semantics gives them meaning. Together, they let us create and interpret logical arguments, bridging the gap between abstract symbols and real-world concepts.
Syntax of First-Order Languages
Top images from around the web for Vocabulary and Formation Rules Digital Circuits/Logic Operations - Wikibooks, open books for an open world View original
Is this image relevant?
Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Logical reasoning - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Digital Circuits/Logic Operations - Wikibooks, open books for an open world View original
Is this image relevant?
Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Vocabulary and Formation Rules Digital Circuits/Logic Operations - Wikibooks, open books for an open world View original
Is this image relevant?
Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Logical reasoning - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Digital Circuits/Logic Operations - Wikibooks, open books for an open world View original
Is this image relevant?
Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
First-order languages built from vocabulary (logical symbols, non-logical symbols, variables) and formation rules for well-formed formulas
Logical symbols include connectives (∧, ∨, →, ↔, ¬), quantifiers (∀, ∃), equality (=), and parentheses
Non-logical symbols comprise constant symbols, function symbols, and predicate symbols, each with specified arity
Formation rules dictate how to combine symbols to create valid expressions
Ensure proper use of parentheses for grouping
Specify correct application of connectives and quantifiers
Terms constructed recursively from variables, constant symbols, and function symbols applied to terms
Example: f ( x , g ( y ) ) f(x, g(y)) f ( x , g ( y )) where f f f and g g g are function symbols, x x x and y y y are variables
Atomic formulas formed by applying predicate symbols to terms or using equality symbol between terms
Example: P ( x , c ) P(x, c) P ( x , c ) where P P P is a predicate symbol, x x x is a variable, and c c c is a constant symbol
Complex formulas created by combining atomic formulas with logical connectives and quantifiers
Example: ∀ x ( P ( x ) → ∃ y ( Q ( x , y ) ) ) ∀x(P(x) → ∃y(Q(x, y))) ∀ x ( P ( x ) → ∃ y ( Q ( x , y ))) where P P P and Q Q Q are predicate symbols
Syntactic rules allow precise formulation of mathematical statements and logical arguments
Example: Expressing "For all real numbers, if x is positive, then there exists a y such that y^2 = x" as ∀ x ( x > 0 → ∃ y ( y 2 = x ) ) ∀x(x > 0 → ∃y(y^2 = x)) ∀ x ( x > 0 → ∃ y ( y 2 = x ))
Semantics of First-Order Languages
Structures and Interpretations
Semantics provide meaning to syntactic elements by interpreting them in mathematical structures
Structure for first-order language consists of non-empty domain (universe) and interpretations for non-logical symbols
Example: For arithmetic, domain could be set of integers, with interpretations for addition, multiplication, etc.
Interpretation function assigns:
Elements of domain to constant symbols
Functions on domain to function symbols
Relations on domain to predicate symbols
Variable assignments map variables to elements of domain
Allow evaluation of formulas with free variables
Models and Truth
Satisfaction defines when formula is true in structure under given variable assignment
Sentence (formula with no free variables) true in structure if satisfied by all variable assignments
Model of set of sentences represents structure where all sentences in set are true
Example: Standard model of arithmetic satisfies Peano axioms
Semantic entailment relation (⊨) captures notion of logical consequence between sentences or sets of sentences
Example: If Φ ⊨ ψ Φ ⊨ ψ Φ ⊨ ψ , then ψ is true in all models of Φ
Syntax vs Semantics
Correspondence and Principles
Syntax provides formal rules for constructing expressions, semantics assigns meaning to these expressions
Precise correspondence between syntactic operations and semantic interpretations in structures
Example: Syntactic conjunction (∧) corresponds to semantic intersection of truth conditions
Principle of compositionality states meaning of complex formula determined by meanings of constituent parts and combination method
Example: Truth value of P ∧ Q P ∧ Q P ∧ Q determined by truth values of P P P and Q Q Q
Theoretical Connections
Syntactic substitution of terms for variables corresponds semantically to changing variable assignments
Soundness of inference rules justified by semantic preservation of truth
Completeness theorem establishes fundamental connection between syntactic provability and semantic validity
If a formula is semantically valid, it is syntactically provable
Löwenheim-Skolem theorems reveal limitations in expressive power of first-order languages
Show syntactic properties cannot always distinguish between structures of different cardinalities
Evaluation Techniques
Determine well-formedness of expressions by applying syntactic rules recursively
Example: ∀ x ( P ( x ) ∧ Q ( x ) ) ∀x(P(x) ∧ Q(x)) ∀ x ( P ( x ) ∧ Q ( x )) is well-formed, but ( ∀ x ) P ( x ) ) (∀x)P(x)) ( ∀ x ) P ( x )) is not
Identify free and bound variables in formulas
Example: In ∀ x ( P ( x ) → Q ( y ) ) ∀x(P(x) → Q(y)) ∀ x ( P ( x ) → Q ( y )) , x x x is bound and y y y is free
Evaluate truth value of formulas in given structures by recursively applying satisfaction relation
Example: Evaluate ∀ x ∃ y ( x < y ) ∀x∃y(x < y) ∀ x ∃ y ( x < y ) in structure of natural numbers with usual ordering
Use semantic tableaux or truth trees to systematically analyze satisfiability of formulas and validity of arguments
Construct tree by breaking down formula into subformulas
Advanced Analysis Techniques
Apply compactness theorem to reason about existence of models for infinite sets of sentences
If every finite subset of a set of sentences has a model, the entire set has a model
Utilize Löwenheim-Skolem theorems to construct models of different cardinalities for consistent theories
Example: Constructing countable model for theory with uncountable model
Employ techniques to simplify and standardize first-order formulas:
Prenex normal form moves all quantifiers to front of formula
Skolemization eliminates existential quantifiers by introducing new function symbols