10.2 Anthropometric measurements and body composition assessment

Anthropometric measurements and body composition assessments are crucial tools in strength and conditioning. They help trainers track physical changes, set goals, and tailor programs to individual athletes. These methods range from simple tape measures to high-tech scanners.

Understanding an athlete's body composition is key to optimizing performance. By measuring fat mass, muscle mass, and other factors, coaches can fine-tune training and nutrition plans. Different sports have unique body composition needs, so assessments must be sport-specific.

Anthropometric Measurements in Strength and Conditioning

Common Measurements and Techniques

Top images from around the web for Common Measurements and Techniques

• 

  Body mass index - wikidoc View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Body Stat Calculator | Way Of The Dave . Com View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Body mass index - wikidoc View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Body Stat Calculator | Way Of The Dave . Com View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Common Measurements and Techniques

• 

  Body mass index - wikidoc View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Body Stat Calculator | Way Of The Dave . Com View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Body mass index - wikidoc View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Body Stat Calculator | Way Of The Dave . Com View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Height measured using a stadiometer with the athlete standing erect, feet together, and head in the Frankfort plane
  • Recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm or 1/4 inch
• Body mass (weight) measured using a calibrated scale with the athlete wearing minimal clothing
  • Recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg or 1/4 pound
• Circumference measurements taken using a flexible, non-elastic tape measure at specific body sites
  • Sites include the neck, chest, waist, hips, thigh, and calf
  • Provide information about the distribution of muscle mass and fat tissue
• Skinfold measurements assess the thickness of subcutaneous fat at specific body sites using calipers
  • Common sites include the triceps, subscapular, chest, abdomen, suprailiac, and thigh

Importance and Applications

• Anthropometric measurements are non-invasive methods used to quantify body dimensions, proportions, and composition
• Essential for assessing and monitoring an athlete's physical characteristics and changes over time
• Help to identify an athlete's somatotype (body type) and track changes in response to training and nutrition interventions
• Used in conjunction with other performance tests to develop individualized training programs and set realistic goals
• Can be used to monitor growth and development in young athletes and identify potential health concerns (obesity, eating disorders)

Body Composition Assessment Methods

Common Techniques and Procedures

• Skinfold measurements estimate body fat percentage by measuring the thickness of subcutaneous fat using calipers
  • Measurements are entered into prediction equations specific to the population and body sites used
  • Equations convert skinfold thicknesses to an estimate of total body density, which is then used to calculate body fat percentage
• Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) estimates body composition by measuring the resistance to a weak electrical current passed through the body
  • Lean tissue contains more water and electrolytes, conducting current more easily than fat tissue
  • BIA devices use this principle to estimate fat mass and fat-free mass
• Hydrostatic weighing (underwater weighing) is considered a gold standard method for assessing body composition
  • Involves submerging the individual underwater and measuring their weight
  • Body density is calculated using the individual's underwater weight, water density, and residual lung volume
  • Body density is then used to estimate fat mass and fat-free mass using specific equations (Siri or Brozek)

Advanced Methods and Emerging Technologies

• Air displacement plethysmography (BOD POD) uses the same principles as hydrostatic weighing but with air instead of water
  • Measures body volume by detecting changes in air pressure within a sealed chamber
  • Body density is calculated using the individual's body volume and mass, then used to estimate body composition
• Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) uses low-dose X-rays to measure bone mineral density, fat mass, and lean mass
  • Provides detailed regional body composition data (arms, legs, trunk)
  • Considered a reference method for body composition assessment in research settings
• 3D body scanning uses optical cameras or infrared sensors to create a detailed 3D model of the body
  • Provides measurements of body shape, size, and circumferences
  • Emerging technology with potential applications in tracking body composition changes and assessing sport-specific morphology

Body Composition Results and Relevance

Interpreting and Applying Results

• Body composition results are typically expressed as a percentage of body fat (%BF) and fat-free mass (FFM)
  • Values can be compared to population norms and sport-specific guidelines to determine an athlete's status and set appropriate goals
• Excess body fat can negatively impact athletic performance
  • Increases the energy cost of movement, reduces power-to-weight ratio, and limits heat dissipation
  • However, extremely low body fat levels may compromise health and performance (hormone imbalances, impaired immune function)
• Fat-free mass, particularly muscle mass, is essential for generating force, power, and speed in athletic movements
  • Monitoring changes in FFM can help assess the effectiveness of training and nutrition interventions
  • Adequate FFM is important for injury prevention and recovery

Considerations for Different Populations and Sports

• Body composition goals should be individualized based on the athlete's sport, position, age, sex, and health status
  • Endurance athletes (distance runners, cyclists) typically have lower body fat percentages compared to strength and power athletes (weightlifters, football linemen)
  • Female athletes generally have higher body fat percentages than male athletes due to hormonal differences and reproductive health considerations
• Gradual changes in body composition are recommended to maintain performance and minimize health risks
  • Rapid weight loss or gain can lead to muscle loss, hormonal disturbances, and decreased performance
  • Athletes should work with a sports nutritionist or registered dietitian to develop safe and effective strategies for achieving body composition goals
• Interpreting body composition results requires consideration of the assessment method's limitations
  • Potential for measurement error, population-specific prediction equations, and individual variability
  • Results should be used in conjunction with other performance and health markers to guide decision-making

Advantages and Limitations of Body Composition Assessment Techniques

Skinfold Measurements

• Advantages:
  • Relatively inexpensive, portable, and quick to administer
  • Can be used to track changes in body composition over time
  • Provides an estimate of regional fat distribution
• Limitations:
  • Requires skilled technicians to ensure accuracy and reliability
  • Subject to inter-rater variability and measurement error
  • May not accurately assess visceral fat or changes in muscle mass
  • Prediction equations are population-specific and may not be valid for all athletes

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)

• Advantages:
  • Non-invasive, quick, and relatively inexpensive
  • Portable and easy to use in field settings
  • Can provide estimates of total body water and extracellular/intracellular water
• Limitations:
  • Results can be influenced by hydration status, recent exercise, and electrode placement
  • May not be as accurate as other methods in athletes or individuals with extreme body compositions
  • Prediction equations are device-specific and may not be valid for all populations

Hydrostatic Weighing

• Advantages:
  • Considered a gold standard method due to its high accuracy and reliability
  • Can be used to validate other body composition assessment methods
  • Provides an estimate of body density, which is then used to calculate body fat percentage
• Limitations:
  • Requires specialized equipment (water tank, underwater scale, residual lung volume measurement)
  • Time-consuming and may be uncomfortable for some individuals
  • Requires participant cooperation and adherence to pre-test guidelines (fasting, no exercise, etc.)
  • May not be practical for frequent monitoring or large-scale testing

Advanced Methods (DXA, BOD POD, 3D Scanning)

• Advantages:
  • High accuracy and reliability
  • Provide detailed regional body composition data
  • Non-invasive and relatively quick to administer
  • Can be used to assess changes in bone mineral density (DXA)
• Limitations:
  • Require expensive equipment and trained personnel
  • May not be readily accessible or practical for frequent monitoring
  • Exposure to low-dose radiation (DXA)
  • Lack of portability for field testing
  • Limited validation studies in diverse athlete populations