You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

10.3 Biological indicators in sediments

10 min readaugust 20, 2024

Biological indicators in sediments are like time capsules, preserving clues about past environmental conditions in lakes and other aquatic systems. These indicators, including , , and pollen, allow scientists to reconstruct a lake's history and understand how it has changed over time.

By studying these tiny remnants, researchers can piece together information about past water quality, climate, and human impacts on aquatic ecosystems. This knowledge helps inform lake management decisions and provides valuable insights into long-term environmental changes.

Biological indicators in sediments

  • Biological indicators are remains of organisms preserved in sediments that provide information about past environmental conditions
  • Studying these indicators allows limnologists to reconstruct the history of a lake or other aquatic system
  • Different types of organisms can serve as indicators, each with their own ecological preferences and preservation potential

Types of biological indicators

Top images from around the web for Types of biological indicators
Top images from around the web for Types of biological indicators
  • Diatoms: Microscopic algae with silica cell walls that preserve well in sediments
  • Chironomids: Aquatic insect larvae that leave behind head capsules in sediments
  • : Small crustaceans with calcified shells that can be preserved in sediments
  • : Water fleas that leave behind resting eggs and exoskeletons in sediments
  • : Produced by plants and can be transported into aquatic systems, providing information about terrestrial vegetation
  • : Produced by photosynthetic organisms and can indicate past primary productivity

Diatoms as indicators

  • Diatoms are sensitive to changes in water chemistry, particularly pH, nutrients, and salinity
  • Different species have specific ecological preferences, allowing for the reconstruction of past environmental conditions
  • Diatom assemblages can indicate changes in lake trophic status, such as eutrophication or oligotrophication
  • Shifts in diatom species composition can also reflect changes in climate, such as temperature and precipitation

Chironomids as indicators

  • Chironomid larvae inhabit a wide range of aquatic habitats and are sensitive to changes in temperature, oxygen, and nutrient levels
  • Different species have specific temperature preferences, allowing for the reconstruction of past water temperatures
  • Changes in chironomid assemblages can indicate shifts in lake productivity and oxygenation
  • Chironomids can also respond to changes in lake level and salinity

Ostracods as indicators

  • Ostracods are sensitive to changes in water chemistry, particularly salinity and alkalinity
  • Different species have specific ecological preferences, allowing for the reconstruction of past hydrochemical conditions
  • Ostracod assemblages can indicate changes in lake level, water balance, and ionic composition
  • The geochemistry of ostracod shells can provide information about past water temperature and isotopic composition

Cladocera as indicators

  • Cladocera are sensitive to changes in lake trophic status, predation pressure, and habitat structure
  • Different species have specific ecological preferences, allowing for the reconstruction of past lake conditions
  • Changes in Cladocera assemblages can indicate shifts in lake productivity, food web structure, and macrophyte abundance
  • Cladocera can also respond to changes in climate, such as temperature and precipitation

Pollen grains as indicators

  • Pollen grains produced by terrestrial plants can be transported into lakes by wind or water
  • Pollen assemblages in lake sediments reflect the composition of the surrounding vegetation
  • Changes in pollen assemblages can indicate shifts in climate, such as temperature and precipitation
  • Pollen can also provide information about human activities, such as deforestation and agriculture

Pigments as indicators

  • Pigments produced by photosynthetic organisms, such as chlorophyll and carotenoids, can be preserved in sediments
  • Pigment concentrations can indicate past levels of primary productivity in a lake
  • Changes in pigment composition can reflect shifts in the dominant primary producers, such as algae and cyanobacteria
  • Pigments can also provide information about past light conditions and water clarity

Preservation of biological indicators

  • The preservation of biological indicators in sediments depends on various factors, such as sedimentation rates, oxygen levels, and microbial activity
  • Indicators with robust structures, such as diatom frustules and ostracod shells, tend to preserve better than soft-bodied organisms
  • Anoxic conditions at the sediment-water interface can enhance the preservation of organic indicators, such as pigments and chitin

Factors affecting indicator preservation

  • Sedimentation rates influence the temporal resolution and completeness of the indicator record
  • High sedimentation rates can lead to better preservation and higher resolution, while low rates may result in gaps or mixing of indicators
  • Oxygen levels in the water column and sediments affect the decomposition of organic indicators
  • Microbial activity can degrade organic indicators, particularly in the presence of oxygen

Sedimentation rates and indicators

  • Sedimentation rates determine the time span and resolution of the indicator record
  • High sedimentation rates allow for the reconstruction of short-term changes and events, such as seasonal or annual variations
  • Low sedimentation rates may result in the averaging of indicator data over longer time periods, reducing the ability to detect short-term changes
  • Sedimentation rates can vary over time due to changes in climate, land use, and lake morphometry

Bioturbation effects on indicators

  • Bioturbation refers to the mixing of sediments by the activities of benthic organisms, such as burrowing and feeding
  • Bioturbation can disrupt the vertical stratification of indicators in sediments, leading to the mixing of older and younger material
  • Extensive bioturbation can reduce the temporal resolution of the indicator record and make it more difficult to interpret
  • The degree of bioturbation can vary depending on the abundance and activity of benthic organisms, as well as sediment characteristics

Interpreting biological indicator data

  • Interpreting biological indicator data requires an understanding of the ecology and preferences of the indicator organisms
  • Indicator assemblages are often analyzed using multivariate statistical methods, such as ordination and clustering
  • Changes in indicator assemblages over time can be related to environmental variables, such as temperature, nutrients, and pH
  • Indicator data should be interpreted in the context of other paleolimnological proxies, such as geochemical and physical indicators

Indicators of past water quality

  • Biological indicators can provide information about past water quality conditions, such as nutrient levels, pH, and salinity
  • Diatom assemblages are particularly useful for reconstructing past nutrient concentrations and lake trophic status
  • Chironomid and ostracod assemblages can indicate changes in oxygen levels and salinity
  • Pigment concentrations can reflect past levels of primary productivity and water clarity

Indicators of past climate conditions

  • Biological indicators can respond to changes in climate, such as temperature and precipitation
  • Chironomid assemblages are sensitive to changes in water temperature and can be used to reconstruct past summer temperatures
  • Pollen assemblages in lake sediments reflect changes in terrestrial vegetation, which is influenced by climate
  • Shifts in diatom and cladoceran assemblages can indicate changes in lake level and water balance, which are related to precipitation and evaporation

Indicators of anthropogenic impacts

  • Biological indicators can reveal the effects of human activities on aquatic ecosystems
  • Changes in diatom and cladoceran assemblages can indicate the onset and progression of eutrophication due to nutrient enrichment from agriculture and urbanization
  • Shifts in chironomid and ostracod assemblages can reflect changes in lake salinity and water level due to human water use and regulation
  • The presence of specific indicator taxa, such as pollution-tolerant chironomids, can indicate the impact of industrial or sewage pollution

Biological vs geochemical indicators

  • Biological indicators provide information about the response of living organisms to environmental changes, while geochemical indicators reflect physical and chemical processes
  • Biological indicators can be more sensitive to short-term and subtle changes in the environment compared to geochemical indicators
  • Geochemical indicators, such as stable isotopes and elemental ratios, can provide complementary information about past climate, productivity, and catchment processes
  • Combining biological and geochemical indicators can provide a more comprehensive understanding of past environmental conditions

Advantages of biological indicators

  • Biological indicators respond directly to environmental changes that are relevant to aquatic organisms and ecosystems
  • Many biological indicators, such as diatoms and chironomids, have well-established ecological preferences and are widely used in paleolimnological studies
  • Biological indicators can provide high-resolution records of past environmental changes, particularly in systems with high sedimentation rates
  • Some biological indicators, such as pollen and pigments, can provide information about both aquatic and terrestrial environments

Limitations of biological indicators

  • The preservation of biological indicators can be variable and dependent on factors such as sedimentation rates, oxygen levels, and microbial activity
  • Bioturbation can disrupt the vertical stratification of indicators in sediments, reducing the temporal resolution and reliability of the record
  • Some biological indicators may have complex or poorly understood ecological preferences, making it difficult to interpret their changes over time
  • The response of biological indicators to multiple environmental stressors can be complex and non-linear, requiring careful interpretation and calibration

Sampling biological indicators

  • Sediment cores are typically collected from the deepest part of a lake using a gravity corer or piston corer
  • Multiple cores may be collected to assess spatial variability and ensure reproducibility
  • Cores are usually sectioned at regular intervals (e.g., 0.5-1 cm) to obtain samples for indicator analysis
  • Samples should be stored in cool, dark conditions to minimize degradation of organic indicators

Processing indicator samples

  • Diatom samples are typically processed using acid digestion (HCl and H2O2) to remove organic matter and isolate the silica frustules
  • Chironomid and cladoceran samples are processed using alkali digestion (KOH) to deflocculate the sediment and isolate the chitinous head capsules and exoskeletons
  • Ostracod samples may require sieving and picking of individual valves for identification and geochemical analysis
  • Pollen samples are processed using acid digestion (HF and HCl) to remove silicates and concentrate the pollen grains
  • Pigment samples are typically extracted using organic solvents (e.g., acetone) and analyzed using spectrophotometric or chromatographic methods

Microscopy techniques for indicators

  • Diatom, chironomid, cladoceran, and pollen samples are typically analyzed using light at high magnifications (400-1000x)
  • Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) may be used for detailed taxonomic identification and morphological analysis of indicators
  • Ostracod valves may be analyzed using light microscopy or SEM for identification and morphological analysis
  • Automated image analysis techniques, such as FlowCAM, can be used for rapid enumeration and sizing of indicator taxa

Quantitative analysis of indicators

  • Indicator data are typically expressed as relative abundances (percentages) or concentrations (number of individuals per gram of sediment)
  • Stratigraphic diagrams are used to visualize changes in indicator assemblages over time
  • Multivariate statistical methods, such as ordination (PCA, CA) and clustering, are used to identify patterns and relationships in indicator data
  • Transfer functions based on modern calibration datasets can be used to quantitatively reconstruct past environmental variables, such as temperature and nutrient levels

Statistical methods for indicator data

  • Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) is often used to assess the gradient length and determine the appropriate ordination method (linear or unimodal)
  • Principal components analysis (PCA) is used for linear gradients, while correspondence analysis (CA) is used for unimodal gradients
  • Constrained ordination methods, such as canonical correspondence analysis (CCA), can be used to relate indicator assemblages to environmental variables
  • Cluster analysis, such as CONISS, can be used to identify significant zones or periods of change in the indicator record

Paleolimnological reconstructions

  • Biological indicators are used in conjunction with other paleolimnological proxies, such as geochemical and physical indicators, to reconstruct past environmental conditions
  • Transfer functions based on modern calibration datasets are used to quantitatively reconstruct past variables, such as temperature, pH, and nutrient levels
  • Reconstructions are typically presented as time series plots, showing changes in the variable of interest over the length of the sediment record
  • Paleolimnological reconstructions can provide valuable information about the natural variability and long-term dynamics of aquatic ecosystems, as well as the impacts of human activities

Indicators in shallow vs deep sediments

  • The preservation and interpretation of biological indicators can differ between shallow and deep lake sediments
  • Shallow sediments are more susceptible to wind-induced mixing and resuspension, which can lead to the homogenization of indicator assemblages
  • Deep sediments are generally less affected by physical mixing and provide a more stable and continuous record of past environmental conditions
  • Sedimentation rates and the degree of bioturbation can also vary between shallow and deep sediments, affecting the temporal resolution and reliability of the indicator record

Indicators in marine vs freshwater sediments

  • Biological indicators in marine sediments can differ from those in freshwater sediments due to differences in environmental conditions and species composition
  • Marine sediments often have lower sedimentation rates and higher levels of bioturbation compared to freshwater sediments, which can affect the preservation and resolution of indicator records
  • Salinity is a key factor influencing the distribution and composition of biological indicators in marine environments
  • Some indicator groups, such as foraminifera and dinoflagellate cysts, are more commonly used in marine paleolimnological studies, while others, such as diatoms and chironomids, are more prevalent in freshwater studies

Applications in lake management

  • Paleolimnological studies using biological indicators can inform lake management and restoration efforts
  • Reconstructions of past water quality and ecosystem conditions can provide baseline data and help set realistic targets for lake restoration
  • Indicator data can help identify the timing and causes of lake degradation, such as eutrophication or acidification, and guide management interventions
  • Paleolimnological data can also be used to assess the effectiveness of past management actions and inform adaptive management strategies

Biological indicators and eutrophication

  • Eutrophication, or the enrichment of waters with nutrients, is a major threat to lake ecosystems worldwide
  • Biological indicators, particularly diatoms and cladocera, are sensitive to changes in lake trophic status and can be used to reconstruct the history of eutrophication
  • Shifts in diatom assemblages, such as increased abundance of nutrient-tolerant taxa (e.g., Stephanodiscus, Aulacoseira), can indicate the onset and progression of eutrophication
  • Changes in cladoceran assemblages, such as decreased abundance of large-bodied taxa (e.g., Daphnia) and increased abundance of small-bodied taxa (e.g., Bosmina), can also reflect eutrophication
  • Pigment concentrations, particularly chlorophyll-a, can provide a proxy for past primary productivity and the severity of eutrophication

Indicators and lake restoration efforts

  • Paleolimnological studies using biological indicators can help guide lake restoration efforts by providing information about pre-disturbance conditions and recovery trajectories
  • Reconstructions of past water quality and ecosystem conditions can help set realistic targets for lake restoration and assess the feasibility of different management options
  • Indicator data can be used to identify the timing and causes of lake degradation, such as eutrophication or acidification, and prioritize management interventions
  • Paleolimnological data can also be used to monitor the effectiveness of restoration measures, such as nutrient load reductions or biomanipulation, and inform adaptive management strategies
  • By comparing post-restoration indicator assemblages to pre-disturbance assemblages, managers can assess the degree of ecosystem recovery and identify any lingering impacts or new stressors
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary