10.4 Bounded rationality and satisficing behavior

Bounded rationality challenges the idea that people always make perfect decisions. It recognizes that our brains have limits, and we often settle for "good enough" choices instead of the absolute best ones.

This concept is crucial in behavioral economics. It explains why people sometimes make choices that seem irrational, and how our mental shortcuts can lead to predictable patterns in economic behavior.

Bounded Rationality and Cognitive Limits

Concept and Assumptions

Top images from around the web for Concept and Assumptions

• 

  Herbert Simon: Racionalidad Limitada - Percepciones Económicas View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Herbert Simon: Racionalidad Limitada - Percepciones Económicas View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Concept and Assumptions

• 

  Herbert Simon: Racionalidad Limitada - Percepciones Económicas View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Herbert Simon: Racionalidad Limitada - Percepciones Económicas View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Bounded rationality recognizes limitations of human cognitive abilities in decision-making
• Assumes decision-makers have finite computational capabilities and limited information access
• Challenges traditional economic assumption of perfect rationality
• Posits humans as "satisficers" rather than "optimizers" in decision processes
• Acknowledges influence of time constraints, cognitive biases, and limited memory capacity
• Suggests individuals may not seek best possible outcome, but rather satisfactory solutions

Impact on Decision-Making

• Individuals often rely on simplifying strategies and mental shortcuts (heuristics)
• Decision-makers face difficulties evaluating all possible alternatives
• Cognitive limitations affect ability to process complex information
• Time pressures constrain thorough analysis of options
• Memory constraints limit retention and recall of relevant information
• Biases influence perception and interpretation of available data

Satisficing vs Maximizing Behavior

Satisficing Behavior

• Refers to decision strategy seeking "good enough" or satisfactory solutions
• Accepts solutions meeting predetermined acceptability levels
• Introduces concept of aspiration levels as minimum criteria for solution acceptance
• Often observed in complex environments where evaluating all alternatives is impractical
• Acknowledges costs (time, effort, cognitive resources) may outweigh marginal benefits of improvement
• Examples:
  • Choosing first apartment that meets basic criteria rather than exhaustively searching
  • Selecting a restaurant based on convenience and decent reviews rather than finding the absolute best

Maximizing Behavior

• Aims to achieve best possible outcome through comprehensive evaluation
• Seeks optimal solutions by considering all available alternatives
• Assumes decision-makers have unlimited time, information, and cognitive resources
• Often impractical in real-world scenarios with time constraints and limited information
• Can lead to decision paralysis or excessive time investment in minor choices
• Examples:
  • Spending months researching every possible car model before making a purchase
  • Agonizing over menu choices to find the perfect meal at a restaurant

Bounded Rationality in Economic Decisions

Market Implications

• Economic agents may not always make optimal choices in complex markets
• Can lead to inefficiencies and suboptimal outcomes in economic systems
• Traditional economic models based on perfect rationality may have limited predictive power
• Emergence of behavioral patterns and market anomalies deviating from standard theory predictions
• Importance of adaptive strategies and learning processes in decision-maker behavior
• Examples:
  • Investors making suboptimal investment decisions due to information overload
  • Consumers choosing familiar brands over potentially better alternatives due to decision fatigue

Policy and Design Considerations

• Recognition of bounded rationality emphasizes need for simpler regulations
• Importance of intuitive choice architectures in policy design
• Consideration of cognitive limitations in analyzing economic behavior
• Implications for market structure and competition policies
• Need for adaptive policy approaches accounting for learning and behavioral changes
• Examples:
  • Simplifying tax forms to reduce cognitive burden on taxpayers
  • Designing retirement savings plans with sensible default options

Heuristics in Bounded Rationality

Common Heuristics

• Availability heuristic relies on readily available information
• Representativeness heuristic judges probabilities based on similarities
• Anchoring and adjustment heuristic relies on initial information for subsequent judgments
• Affect heuristic uses emotional responses to guide decision-making
• Recognition heuristic chooses familiar options over unfamiliar ones
• Examples:
  • Overestimating likelihood of plane crashes due to recent news coverage (availability)
  • Judging investment potential based on similarity to past successful investments (representativeness)

Heuristics in Economic Behavior

• Allow decision-makers to reduce cognitive load and make faster decisions
• Can be efficient in many situations with limited time or information
• May lead to systematic biases and errors in judgment (overconfidence, neglect of base rates)
• Explain departures from standard rational choice theory
• Contribute to observed market anomalies and behavioral patterns
• Examples:
  • Consumer brand loyalty based on familiarity rather than objective quality
  • Investors following trends or "hot tips" without thorough analysis