10.4 Copyright and intellectual property in digital art

Copyright and intellectual property are crucial aspects of digital art. Artists must understand their rights and protections to safeguard their creations in the digital realm. This includes knowing about copyright basics, licensing options, and emerging challenges in virtual environments.

As technology evolves, new issues arise around AI-generated art, blockchain, and international copyright enforcement. Artists need to stay informed about these trends to navigate the changing landscape and protect their intellectual property effectively.

Copyright basics for digital art

• Copyright is a form of intellectual property protection that grants creators exclusive rights over their original works, including digital art, for a limited period of time
• Copyright protection is automatic as soon as a work is created and fixed in a tangible form, but registration provides additional benefits and is required for legal action in some jurisdictions
• Copyright applies to a wide range of digital art, including illustrations, photographs, 3D models, animations, and immersive experiences

Exclusive rights of copyright holders

Top images from around the web for Exclusive rights of copyright holders

• 

  Copyright & Creative Commons licenses – Teach with Free & Open Educational Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  IPR and Digital World - International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Week 3: Audio-Slides “The Rights of Copyright Owners” | IP Law 422 001 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Copyright & Creative Commons licenses – Teach with Free & Open Educational Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  IPR and Digital World - International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Exclusive rights of copyright holders

• 

  Copyright & Creative Commons licenses – Teach with Free & Open Educational Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  IPR and Digital World - International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Week 3: Audio-Slides “The Rights of Copyright Owners” | IP Law 422 001 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Copyright & Creative Commons licenses – Teach with Free & Open Educational Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  IPR and Digital World - International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Reproduction right: The exclusive right to make copies of the copyrighted work
• Distribution right: The exclusive right to distribute copies of the work to the public by sale, rental, lease, or lending
• Public display right: The exclusive right to display the work publicly, including digital displays
• Derivative works right: The exclusive right to create adaptations, translations, or other works based on the original copyrighted work
• Public performance right: The exclusive right to perform the work publicly, which may apply to certain types of digital art, such as animations or interactive experiences

Copyright vs patents and trademarks

• Copyright protects original creative expressions, while patents protect inventions and trademarks protect brand names, logos, and other identifying marks
• Copyright is automatic and lasts for the creator's life plus a certain number of years (varies by country), while patents and trademarks require registration and have shorter terms
• In the context of digital art, copyright is the most relevant form of protection, although patents may apply to innovative technologies used in creating or displaying the art, and trademarks may protect artists' brand identities

Public domain and fair use

• Public domain works are not protected by copyright and can be freely used by anyone without permission (examples: works whose copyright has expired, works created by the U.S. federal government)
• Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research
• Factors considered in determining fair use include the purpose and character of the use, the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount and substantiality of the portion used, and the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work
• Fair use is a complex and case-specific concept, and artists should be cautious when relying on it for using others' copyrighted works in their digital art

Protecting digital artwork

• As digital art becomes increasingly valuable and easily shared online, artists must take proactive steps to protect their intellectual property rights and prevent unauthorized use or copying of their works
• Implementing a combination of legal, technological, and practical measures can help artists safeguard their digital creations and enforce their rights when infringement occurs

Copyright notices and watermarks

• Including a copyright notice (e.g., © [Year] [Artist Name]) on digital artworks can deter potential infringers and make it easier to prove ownership in case of a dispute
• Watermarks, which are semi-transparent overlays or embedded digital signatures, can help identify the artist and discourage unauthorized use of the artwork
• Visible watermarks should be placed strategically to minimize interference with the artwork while still being noticeable, while invisible watermarks can be detected using specialized software

Registering copyrights with government

• While copyright protection is automatic, registering a work with the relevant government agency (e.g., U.S. Copyright Office) provides additional benefits:
  • Public record of ownership
  • Ability to sue for infringement and recover statutory damages and attorney's fees
  • Presumption of validity in court
• To register a copyright, artists typically need to submit an application, pay a fee, and provide copies of the work being registered

Proving copyright infringement

• To prove copyright infringement, an artist must show:
  1. Ownership of a valid copyright
  2. Copying of original elements of the work
• Evidence of copying can be direct (e.g., witness testimony, admission by infringer) or circumstantial (e.g., access to the work and substantial similarity)
• Tools like reverse image search and digital forensics can help artists discover and document instances of infringement online
• Keeping records of the creation process, such as sketches, date-stamped files, and correspondence, can help establish ownership and originality in case of a dispute

Licensing digital art

• Licensing allows artists to grant specific rights to use their digital artworks to others while retaining ownership and control over the works
• By offering various licensing options, artists can monetize their creations, reach new audiences, and specify how their works can be used

Types of licensing agreements

• Exclusive license: Grants the licensee the sole right to use the artwork for a specific purpose, territory, or time period, preventing even the artist from using it in the same way
• Non-exclusive license: Allows multiple licensees to use the artwork simultaneously for specified purposes, while the artist retains the right to use and license the work to others
• One-time use license: Permits the licensee to use the artwork once for a specific purpose, such as in a single edition of a publication or a time-limited advertising campaign
• Merchandising license: Grants the right to use the artwork on products such as t-shirts, posters, or phone cases, often with a royalty paid to the artist based on sales

Royalty-free vs rights-managed

• Royalty-free licenses allow the licensee to use the artwork multiple times for a one-time fee, without the need to pay ongoing royalties (e.g., stock imagery websites)
• Rights-managed licenses are more restrictive and typically grant specific usage rights for a limited time, territory, or purpose, with fees based on factors such as circulation, size, or duration of use (e.g., custom commissions)
• Artists should carefully consider the terms and pricing of each licensing model to balance accessibility and control over their works

Creative Commons licenses

• Creative Commons (CC) is a nonprofit organization that provides a set of free, standardized licenses that artists can use to allow sharing and use of their works under certain conditions
• The six main CC licenses range from the most permissive (CC BY, allowing any use with attribution) to the most restrictive (CC BY-NC-ND, allowing only non-commercial sharing with attribution and no derivatives)
• CC licenses are widely recognized and can help artists expand the reach of their digital artworks while retaining some control over how they are used
• However, artists should carefully consider the implications of using CC licenses, as they are irrevocable and may limit future commercial opportunities

Intellectual property in virtual worlds

• As virtual worlds, online games, and metaverses become increasingly popular platforms for creating, displaying, and monetizing digital art, new questions arise about intellectual property rights in these digital environments
• Artists, platform owners, and users must navigate complex issues surrounding ownership, control, and use of virtual assets and creations

Virtual property ownership rights

• Virtual property refers to digital assets, such as virtual land, objects, or artworks, that have real-world value and can be bought, sold, or traded within virtual environments
• The ownership and transfer of virtual property are typically governed by the platform's terms of service and end-user license agreements (EULAs), which may limit users' rights compared to real-world property ownership
• Some argue for granting users stronger property rights over their virtual creations and assets, while others emphasize the platform owners' role in enabling and regulating these digital environments

End-user license agreements (EULAs)

• EULAs are legal contracts between virtual world operators and users that set out the terms and conditions for accessing and using the platform, including intellectual property provisions
• Many EULAs assert that the platform owner retains ownership of all virtual assets and user-generated content, granting users only limited licenses to use them within the platform
• Artists should carefully review EULAs to understand how they affect their rights over digital artworks created or displayed in virtual environments and whether they can monetize or transfer these works outside the platform

Selling and transferring virtual assets

• Some virtual worlds and blockchain-based platforms enable users to sell, trade, or transfer virtual assets, including digital art, either within the platform or on external marketplaces
• These transactions may involve cryptocurrencies or platform-specific currencies and often rely on smart contracts to automate the transfer of ownership and payments
• Artists can potentially reach new audiences and monetize their digital creations through these virtual marketplaces, but they should consider the fees, security risks, and legal implications of participating in these ecosystems
• As the legal and regulatory landscape for virtual property and digital art sales continues to evolve, artists should stay informed about their rights and obligations in these emerging markets

International copyright considerations

• In an increasingly globalized and digital world, artists must be aware of international copyright issues that may affect the protection and use of their digital artworks across borders
• While there are international treaties and conventions that aim to harmonize copyright laws, there are still significant differences between countries that can impact artists' rights and remedies

Berne Convention and other treaties

• The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works is the oldest and most widely adopted international copyright treaty, with 179 member countries as of 2021
• The Berne Convention establishes minimum standards for copyright protection, such as the automatic protection of works without registration, the duration of copyright (life of the author plus at least 50 years), and the recognition of moral rights (attribution and integrity)
• Other important international treaties include the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the TRIPS Agreement, which address copyright in the digital age and the relationship between copyright and international trade, respectively

Differences in national copyright laws

• Despite international harmonization efforts, there are still significant differences in copyright laws between countries, such as:
  • Copyright term duration (e.g., life plus 70 years in the U.S. and EU, life plus 50 years in many other countries)
  • Scope of fair use or fair dealing exceptions (e.g., broader in the U.S. than in many other countries)
  • Moral rights protection (e.g., stronger in civil law countries like France and Germany than in common law countries like the U.S. and U.K.)
  • Orphan works (i.e., works whose copyright owner cannot be located) and public domain rules
• Artists should be aware of these differences when creating, licensing, or enforcing their rights in digital artworks across multiple jurisdictions

Enforcing copyrights internationally

• Enforcing copyrights in foreign countries can be challenging due to differences in laws, procedures, and cultural attitudes towards intellectual property
• Artists may need to navigate unfamiliar legal systems, overcome language barriers, and incur significant costs to pursue infringement claims in other countries
• Some strategies for international copyright enforcement include:
  • Registering copyrights in key markets to secure additional protections and remedies
  • Working with local attorneys or agents who are familiar with the relevant laws and procedures
  • Joining collective management organizations (CMOs) that can help monitor and enforce rights on behalf of their members in multiple countries
  • Using international dispute resolution mechanisms, such as the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, for cross-border copyright disputes
• As the digital art market becomes increasingly global, artists should proactively develop strategies for protecting and enforcing their rights internationally

Emerging trends and challenges

• The rapid development of new technologies, platforms, and business models in the digital art world presents both opportunities and challenges for artists, copyright law, and the creative industries
• Staying informed about these emerging trends and their implications for intellectual property is essential for artists to navigate the changing landscape and protect their rights and interests

Artificial intelligence and copyright

• Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used to create, analyze, and transform digital artworks, raising complex questions about authorship, originality, and infringement
• Some key issues include:
  • Can AI-generated works be protected by copyright, and if so, who owns the rights (e.g., the AI developer, the user, or the AI itself)?
  • How do we assess the originality and creativity of AI-generated art for copyright purposes?
  • Can the use of copyrighted works as training data for AI models constitute infringement, and what are the implications for fair use and transformative works?
• As AI becomes more sophisticated and prevalent in the digital art world, policymakers, courts, and stakeholders will need to grapple with these questions and develop new legal frameworks and best practices

Blockchain and smart contracts

• Blockchain technology, which enables secure, decentralized, and immutable record-keeping, has the potential to transform the way digital art is created, authenticated, and traded
• Some potential applications of blockchain for digital art include:
  • Registering and tracking the provenance, ownership, and licensing of digital artworks using non-fungible tokens (NFTs)
  • Enabling direct, peer-to-peer sales and royalty payments between artists and collectors using cryptocurrency and smart contracts
  • Creating decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) for collective ownership, management, and monetization of digital art collections
• While blockchain offers new opportunities for artists to control and benefit from their works, it also raises challenges related to energy consumption, regulatory compliance, and the enforceability of smart contracts

Balancing innovation and protection

• As the digital art ecosystem continues to evolve, policymakers, courts, and stakeholders must strike a balance between fostering innovation and creativity and protecting the rights and interests of artists and copyright owners
• Some key considerations include:
  • Adapting copyright law to new technologies and uses while maintaining its core principles and incentives for creation
  • Promoting the development of new licensing models, platforms, and markets that benefit both artists and users
  • Ensuring that copyright enforcement measures are proportionate, effective, and respectful of users' rights and freedoms
  • Fostering digital literacy, ethics, and best practices among artists, users, and intermediaries to promote a sustainable and equitable digital art ecosystem
• By proactively engaging with these challenges and working collaboratively across sectors and borders, the digital art community can help shape a future that rewards innovation, protects creators, and enriches the cultural landscape for all