You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

The (IDEA) is a cornerstone of special education in the US. It ensures students with disabilities receive appropriate support and accommodations, impacting curriculum, instruction, and assessment in schools nationwide.

IDEA guarantees , promotes early intervention, and empowers parents in educational decision-making. It evolved from earlier legislation, expanding protections and services for students with disabilities over time.

Overview of IDEA

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides comprehensive framework for special education services in the United States
  • Ensures students with disabilities receive appropriate educational support and accommodations
  • Impacts curriculum development, instructional strategies, and assessment practices in special education

Purpose and goals

Top images from around the web for Purpose and goals
Top images from around the web for Purpose and goals
  • Guarantees free appropriate public education () to all eligible children with disabilities
  • Promotes early intervention services for infants and toddlers with disabilities
  • Empowers parents and guardians to participate in their child's educational decision-making process
  • Aims to prepare students with disabilities for further education, employment, and independent living

Historical context

  • Evolved from the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975
  • Underwent significant amendments in 1990, 1997, and 2004 to expand protections and services
  • Addressed previous exclusion and inadequate education of students with disabilities
  • Influenced by civil rights movement and advocacy efforts of parents and disability rights groups

Key principles

  • mandates identification and evaluation of all children with suspected disabilities
  • ensures no child with a disability can be denied education based on the nature or severity of their disability
  • () tailors educational plans to each student's unique needs
  • () promotes inclusion of students with disabilities in general education settings
  • Procedural safeguards protect the rights of students and their families throughout the special education process

Eligibility criteria

  • Determines which students qualify for special education services under IDEA
  • Involves a comprehensive to assess student needs
  • Impacts how special educators identify and support students with disabilities

Disability categories

  • IDEA recognizes 13 specific disability categories for eligibility
  • Includes autism, , and
  • and require specialized support and interventions
  • encompass conditions like ADHD and chronic health issues
  • affect communication skills and academic performance

Evaluation process

  • Multidisciplinary team conducts comprehensive assessments
  • Includes cognitive, academic, social-emotional, and adaptive functioning evaluations
  • Utilizes standardized tests, observations, and input from parents and teachers
  • Considers cultural and linguistic factors to avoid misidentification
  • Results determine eligibility and inform the development of the IEP

Reevaluation requirements

  • Mandates reevaluation at least every three years
  • Can be conducted more frequently if requested by parents or teachers
  • Assesses continued eligibility and appropriateness of current services
  • May involve review of existing data or new assessments as needed
  • Informs updates to the student's IEP and educational programming

Individualized Education Program (IEP)

  • Cornerstone of special education services under IDEA
  • Tailors educational goals and supports to each student's unique needs
  • Guides special educators in designing and implementing appropriate interventions

IEP team composition

  • Includes parents or guardians as essential team members
  • Requires participation of at least one general education teacher
  • provides expertise on specialized instruction
  • School representative knowledgeable about available resources
  • Individual who can interpret evaluation results (often a )
  • Student participates when appropriate, especially in

Required components

  • Present levels of academic achievement and functional performance
  • Measurable annual goals addressing academic and functional needs
  • Special education services, , and supplementary aids
  • Accommodations and modifications for instruction and assessment
  • Extent of participation in general education settings
  • Progress monitoring methods and reporting frequency
  • Transition services for students aged 16 and older

Annual review process

  • Evaluates student progress toward IEP goals
  • Updates goals and services based on current needs and performance
  • Involves all IEP team members in collaborative decision-making
  • Addresses concerns raised by parents, teachers, or other team members
  • Results in a revised IEP for the upcoming academic year

Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

  • Fundamental principle of IDEA promoting inclusion
  • Requires educating students with disabilities alongside non-disabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate
  • Challenges special educators to balance individualized support with inclusive practices

Continuum of placements

  • Ranges from full inclusion in general education to more restrictive settings
  • Includes resource rooms, self-contained classrooms, and separate schools
  • Considers part-time placement options (pull-out services)
  • Residential facilities for students with intensive needs
  • Home or hospital instruction for temporary or medical reasons

Inclusion vs segregation

  • Promotes social integration and peer modeling opportunities
  • Balances academic needs with social-emotional development
  • Considers impact on both students with disabilities and their non-disabled peers
  • Challenges educators to differentiate instruction effectively
  • Requires between general and special education teachers

Supplementary aids and services

  • Assistive technology devices (communication aids, screen readers)
  • Instructional accommodations (extended time, modified assignments)
  • Behavioral supports (positive reinforcement strategies, visual schedules)
  • Related services (speech therapy, occupational therapy, counseling)
  • Paraprofessional support for individual or small group assistance

Procedural safeguards

  • Protects the rights of students with disabilities and their families
  • Ensures transparency and fairness in the special education process
  • Requires special educators to maintain clear communication and documentation

Prior written notice

  • Mandates schools provide detailed information before changes to a student's education
  • Includes proposed actions, reasons for actions, and alternative options considered
  • Explains evaluation procedures and data used to make decisions
  • Informs parents of their rights and available resources
  • Must be provided in the parent's native language or preferred mode of communication
  • Required for initial evaluation and placement in special education
  • Necessary for reevaluations and significant changes to the IEP
  • Parents have the right to revoke consent for special education services
  • Schools must obtain through clear explanations and discussions
  • Lack of parental consent may lead to mediation or hearings

Dispute resolution options

  • Informal meetings between parents and school staff to address concerns
  • Mediation with a neutral third party to facilitate agreement
  • State complaint procedures for alleged violations of IDEA
  • Due process hearings for formal resolution of disputes
  • Civil action in state or federal court if other options are exhausted

Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)

  • Core requirement of IDEA ensuring access to education for students with disabilities
  • Emphasizes individualized instruction to meet unique needs
  • Challenges special educators to balance educational benefit with available resources

Definition and standards

  • Provides special education and related services at public expense
  • Meets state educational standards and adheres to the student's IEP
  • Includes appropriate preschool, elementary, and secondary education
  • Emphasizes educational benefit rather than maximizing potential
  • Requires meaningful progress in light of the child's circumstances

Rowley vs Endrew F. cases

  • Rowley (1982) established "some educational benefit" standard for FAPE
  • Endrew F. (2017) raised the bar to "appropriately ambitious" progress
  • Impacted how courts interpret adequacy of special education services
  • Emphasized importance of challenging objectives for students with disabilities
  • Influenced IEP development and progress monitoring practices
  • Supports student's ability to benefit from special education
  • Includes transportation, developmental, and supportive services
  • Speech-language pathology and audiology services
  • Psychological services, physical and occupational therapy
  • Recreation, including therapeutic recreation
  • Early identification and assessment of disabilities

Transition services

  • Prepares students with disabilities for post-secondary life
  • Focuses on developing skills for independence and future success
  • Requires special educators to collaborate with various agencies and stakeholders

Age requirements

  • Must begin no later than the first IEP in effect when the student turns 16
  • Some states require transition planning to start at an earlier age (14)
  • Continues until the student graduates or ages out of special education
  • Emphasizes importance of early planning for post-secondary goals
  • Allows for adjustment of transition plans as student interests and needs evolve

Postsecondary goals

  • Addresses education, employment, and independent living skills
  • Based on age-appropriate transition assessments and student preferences
  • Includes specific, measurable objectives to guide instruction and support
  • Considers various post-secondary options (college, vocational training, supported employment)
  • Incorporates self-advocacy and self-determination skills development

Interagency collaboration

  • Involves coordination with vocational rehabilitation agencies
  • Engages community organizations and potential employers
  • Includes representatives from post-secondary education institutions
  • Facilitates connections with adult service providers
  • Ensures continuity of support as students transition out of special education

Discipline procedures

  • Balances student rights with school safety and orderly environments
  • Requires special considerations for students with disabilities
  • Challenges special educators to address behavioral issues effectively

Manifestation determination

  • Conducted when a student with a disability faces disciplinary action
  • Determines if behavior was caused by or directly related to the disability
  • Assesses whether the behavior resulted from failure to implement the IEP
  • Involves review of relevant information by IEP team and parents
  • Impacts subsequent disciplinary actions and educational placement

Interim alternative settings

  • Allows temporary placement for up to 45 school days
  • Applies to cases involving weapons, drugs, or serious bodily injury
  • Must provide continued access to general curriculum and IEP services
  • Addresses behaviors while maintaining educational progress
  • Requires functional behavioral assessment and behavior intervention plan

Functional behavioral assessment

  • Identifies the purpose or function of challenging behaviors
  • Examines antecedents, behaviors, and consequences
  • Involves direct observation and data collection
  • Informs development of positive behavior support strategies
  • Guides creation or modification of behavior intervention plans

Funding and allocation

  • Supports implementation of special education services
  • Involves complex funding mechanisms at federal, state, and local levels
  • Impacts resource availability and program quality in special education

Federal vs state contributions

  • IDEA provides federal funds to support special education services
  • States and local districts contribute majority of special education funding
  • Federal contribution aims to cover 40% of excess costs (rarely achieved)
  • State funding formulas vary (pupil-weighted, census-based, resource-based)
  • Local districts often bear significant financial burden for special education

Use of IDEA funds

  • Supports direct services to students with disabilities
  • Funds professional development for teachers and staff
  • Covers costs of evaluations and assessments
  • Provides assistive technology and specialized equipment
  • Supports administrative costs related to IDEA compliance

Maintenance of effort

  • Requires districts to maintain consistent funding levels year to year
  • Prevents reduction of local or state funding due to federal contributions
  • Allows for specific exceptions (decrease in enrollment, costly expenditures)
  • Ensures stability in special education funding and services
  • Impacts budget planning and resource allocation decisions

Implementation challenges

  • Addresses ongoing issues in special education service delivery
  • Requires continuous improvement efforts from educators and policymakers
  • Impacts effectiveness of IDEA in meeting the needs of students with disabilities

Disproportionality issues

  • Overrepresentation of minority students in certain disability categories
  • Underrepresentation in gifted and talented programs
  • Disparities in disciplinary actions and restrictive placements
  • Requires districts to monitor and address significant disproportionality
  • Impacts identification, placement, and discipline practices

Teacher preparation

  • Shortage of qualified special education teachers nationwide
  • Need for ongoing professional development in evidence-based practices
  • Challenges in preparing teachers for inclusive education settings
  • Importance of collaboration skills between general and special educators
  • Addressing burnout and retention issues in special education

Resource allocation

  • Balancing needs of students with disabilities and general education programs
  • Addressing funding disparities between districts and states
  • Challenges in providing specialized services in rural or under-resourced areas
  • Ensuring equitable access to assistive technology and support services
  • Managing caseloads and class sizes for effective instruction and support
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary