10.4 Internet governance and jurisdiction

Internet governance is a complex balancing act. It involves multiple stakeholders working together to shape the internet's evolution. From tech groups setting standards to governments protecting national interests, everyone plays a role in keeping the internet open and secure.

Jurisdiction in the online world is tricky. Courts use principles like "minimum contacts" to decide if they have authority over internet disputes. But enforcing laws across borders is tough, and conflicting regulations can fragment the global internet.

Internet Governance: Multi-stakeholder Approach

Key Stakeholders and Their Roles

Top images from around the web for Key Stakeholders and Their Roles

• 

  Proposal 10 for ICANN: Become More Inclusive by Moving from “Stakeholder” Engagement to Global ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM) « EDRM View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Internet Engineering Task Force View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Proposal 10 for ICANN: Become More Inclusive by Moving from “Stakeholder” Engagement to Global ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM) « EDRM View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Key Stakeholders and Their Roles

• 

  Proposal 10 for ICANN: Become More Inclusive by Moving from “Stakeholder” Engagement to Global ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM) « EDRM View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Internet Engineering Task Force View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Proposal 10 for ICANN: Become More Inclusive by Moving from “Stakeholder” Engagement to Global ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM) « EDRM View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Internet governance involves the development and application of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programs that shape the evolution and use of the Internet
• The multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance involves the participation of governments, the private sector, civil society, and international organizations in the decision-making process
• Key stakeholders in internet governance include:
  • Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN): Coordinates the global internet's systems of unique identifiers, including domain names and IP addresses
  • Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF): Develops and promotes voluntary internet standards, focusing on the technical aspects of the internet protocol suite
  • World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Develops open standards to ensure the long-term growth of the Web (HTML, CSS, XML)
  • Internet Governance Forum (IGF): Facilitates dialogue among stakeholders on internet governance issues

Challenges and Goals of the Multi-stakeholder Model

• The multi-stakeholder model aims to ensure that the internet remains open, interoperable, secure, and resilient while balancing the interests of different stakeholders
• Challenges in internet governance include:
  • Need for consensus among diverse stakeholders with varying interests and priorities
  • Rapid pace of technological change, which can outpace the development of governance frameworks
  • Potential for fragmentation of the internet due to conflicting national laws and regulations
• The multi-stakeholder approach seeks to address these challenges by:
  • Fostering inclusive and transparent decision-making processes
  • Encouraging collaboration and dialogue among stakeholders
  • Promoting the development of harmonized standards and best practices
  • Ensuring the internet remains a global, interconnected network that supports innovation and economic growth

Jurisdiction in the Online World

Principles for Determining Jurisdiction

• Jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court or government to make legal decisions and judgments over individuals or entities
• The global nature of the internet makes it difficult for countries to assert jurisdiction over online content and activities that cross national borders
• The principle of "minimum contacts" is often used to determine whether a court has jurisdiction over an online entity, based on the entity's purposeful availment of the forum state's benefits
  • Example: A company that sells products online to customers in a particular state may be subject to that state's jurisdiction in a legal dispute
• The "effects test" is another approach to determining jurisdiction, based on whether an online activity has substantial effects within a particular jurisdiction
  • Example: A defamatory statement posted online that causes harm to an individual in a specific country may be subject to that country's jurisdiction, even if the statement was posted from another location

Challenges in Asserting Jurisdiction

• Potential for conflicting laws and regulations across different countries, leading to legal uncertainty for online actors
• Difficulty of enforcing judgments across borders, particularly when countries have different legal systems and standards
• Risk of fragmenting the global internet if countries impose divergent or incompatible rules for online content and activities
• Balancing the need for effective regulation with the protection of individual rights and freedoms, such as freedom of expression and privacy
• Adapting traditional legal concepts and doctrines to the unique characteristics of the online environment, such as the ease of cross-border communication and the potential for anonymity

International Standards for Internet Governance

Key Organizations and Their Roles

• International organizations play a crucial role in setting technical standards and best practices for the internet, ensuring interoperability and security across borders
• The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) develops and promotes voluntary internet standards, focusing on the technical aspects of the internet protocol suite
  • Example: The IETF developed the TCP/IP protocol, which is the foundation of internet communication
• The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) is an international community that develops open standards to ensure the long-term growth of the Web
  • Example: W3C standards include HTML, CSS, and XML, which are essential for creating web pages and applications
• The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is responsible for the coordination of the global internet's systems of unique identifiers, including domain names and IP addresses
  • Example: ICANN manages the Domain Name System (DNS), which translates domain names (www.example.com) into IP addresses (192.0.2.1)
• The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is a United Nations agency that coordinates the global use of the radio spectrum, promotes international cooperation in assigning satellite orbits, and develops technical standards for telecommunication networks
  • Example: The ITU develops standards for mobile communication networks (3G, 4G, 5G)

Importance of International Cooperation

• International cooperation is essential for ensuring the stability, security, and interoperability of the global internet
• Harmonized standards and best practices help to reduce fragmentation and promote the free flow of information across borders
• Collaboration among international organizations, governments, and other stakeholders helps to address global challenges, such as cybersecurity threats and the digital divide
• International forums, such as the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), provide a platform for dialogue and the exchange of ideas among diverse stakeholders
• Capacity building and technical assistance programs help to promote the adoption of international standards and best practices in developing countries, fostering a more inclusive and equitable internet

Sovereignty vs Global Internet

Concept of Cyber Sovereignty

• The global nature of the internet challenges traditional notions of national sovereignty, as online activities and content can easily cross borders and jurisdictions
• Some countries assert their sovereignty over the internet by imposing restrictions on online content and activities
  • Example: China's Great Firewall, which censors and blocks access to certain websites and online services
  • Example: Data localization requirements, which mandate that certain types of data be stored within a country's borders
• The concept of "cyber sovereignty" emphasizes a nation's right to control and regulate its domestic cyberspace, including the internet infrastructure and online activities within its borders
• Proponents argue that cyber sovereignty is necessary to protect national security, maintain social stability, and preserve cultural values
• Critics contend that excessive assertions of cyber sovereignty can lead to human rights violations, stifle innovation, and fragment the global internet

Balancing National Interests and Global Connectivity

• Tensions arise when national laws and regulations conflict with the open, global nature of the internet, potentially leading to fragmentation and the creation of "splinternets"
• Balancing national sovereignty with the benefits of a global, interconnected internet requires:
  • International cooperation and dialogue to develop harmonized standards and best practices
  • Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms online, including freedom of expression, access to information, and privacy
  • Transparent and accountable governance mechanisms that involve all stakeholders, including governments, the private sector, civil society, and the technical community
  • Capacity building and technical assistance to help developing countries participate effectively in internet governance processes
• The goal is to create a stable, secure, and interoperable internet that supports innovation, economic growth, and social progress while respecting national sovereignty and cultural diversity