10.5 Retrospective application

Retrospective application is a crucial accounting method that ensures consistency and accuracy in financial reporting. It involves applying changes in accounting policies or correcting errors to prior period financial statements, enhancing comparability across reporting periods.

This method improves transparency and reliability of financial information, aiding decision-making for users of financial statements. Both International Accounting Standards and US GAAP mandate retrospective application, with specific guidelines on implementation and exceptions for impracticability.

Definition of retrospective application

• Accounting method applies changes in accounting policies or corrections of errors to prior period financial statements
• Requires companies to restate previously issued financial reports as if the new policy had always been in place
• Enhances comparability and consistency of financial information across reporting periods

Purpose and importance

• Ensures financial statements accurately reflect the entity's financial position and performance over time
• Improves transparency and reliability of financial reporting for users of financial statements
• Facilitates better decision-making by providing more comparable and consistent financial information

Accounting standards requiring retrospection

• International Accounting Standard (IAS) 8 "Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors" mandates retrospective application
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 250 outlines requirements for retrospective application

IFRS vs US GAAP requirements

Top images from around the web for IFRS vs US GAAP requirements

• 

  The Accounting Cycle | Boundless Accounting View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Making Changes and Correcting Errors | Boundless Accounting View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Income Statement | Boundless Accounting View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Accounting Cycle | Boundless Accounting View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Making Changes and Correcting Errors | Boundless Accounting View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for IFRS vs US GAAP requirements

• 

  The Accounting Cycle | Boundless Accounting View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Making Changes and Correcting Errors | Boundless Accounting View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Income Statement | Boundless Accounting View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Accounting Cycle | Boundless Accounting View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Making Changes and Correcting Errors | Boundless Accounting View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• IFRS (IAS 8) generally requires retrospective application for changes in accounting policies and error corrections
• US GAAP (ASC 250) aligns closely with IFRS, but provides more specific guidance on impracticability exceptions
• Both standards allow for prospective application in certain circumstances (changes in estimates, impracticability)

Steps in retrospective application

• Identify the specific accounting change or error requiring retrospective treatment
• Determine the cumulative effect of the change on retained earnings at the beginning of the earliest period presented
• Recalculate financial statements for all affected periods as if the new policy had always been applied

Identifying affected periods

• Review financial statements to determine the earliest period impacted by the change or error
• Consider materiality thresholds to assess which periods require restatement
• Evaluate any potential cascading effects on subsequent periods' financial statements

Recalculating financial statements

• Adjust opening balances of assets, liabilities, and equity for the earliest period presented
• Recompute financial statement line items affected by the change or error correction
• Ensure consistency in application of the new policy across all affected periods

Adjusting comparative information

• Update prior period financial statements presented for comparative purposes
• Revise footnotes and disclosures to reflect the retrospective application
• Clearly label restated financial information to distinguish from originally issued statements

Limitations and exceptions

• Retrospective application may not always be feasible or cost-effective
• Certain changes in accounting estimates are applied prospectively rather than retrospectively

Impracticability clause

• Allows entities to forgo retrospective application when it is impracticable to determine period-specific effects
• Impracticability arises when reasonable efforts cannot produce reliable information
• Requires disclosure of reasons for impracticability and description of how the change was applied

Cost vs benefit considerations

• Entities must weigh the cost of retrospective application against the benefits to financial statement users
• Factors include availability of historical data, complexity of calculations, and materiality of the change
• May influence the decision to apply changes prospectively if retrospective application is deemed too costly

Disclosure requirements

• Comprehensive disclosures essential for users to understand the nature and impact of retrospective changes
• Must be included in the notes to the financial statements for the period of change and subsequent periods

Nature of accounting change

• Describe the reason for the change in accounting policy or the nature of the error corrected
• Explain how the new policy provides more reliable and relevant information
• Disclose any transitional provisions applied in implementing the change

Effect on financial statements

• Quantify the impact of the change on each financial statement line item affected
• Present the effect on earnings per share for all periods presented
• Provide reconciliations between previously reported and restated amounts for key financial statement components

Examples of retrospective application

• Change from FIFO to weighted average inventory valuation method
• Adoption of a new revenue recognition standard affecting timing of revenue recognition
• Correction of mathematical errors in prior period financial statements

Changes in accounting policies

• Switching from straight-line to accelerated depreciation method for fixed assets
• Adopting the revaluation model for property, plant, and equipment under IAS 16
• Changing from completed contract to percentage-of-completion method for long-term contracts

Error corrections

• Rectifying misclassification of long-term debt as current liabilities
• Adjusting for understated warranty provisions due to calculation errors
• Correcting improper capitalization of research and development costs

Impact on financial ratios

• Retrospective changes can significantly affect key financial ratios and performance metrics
• Profitability ratios (ROA, ROE) may change due to adjustments in net income and asset/equity values
• Liquidity and solvency ratios could be impacted by restatements of current assets and liabilities

Challenges in implementation

• Retrospective application often requires significant time, resources, and expertise
• May necessitate changes to accounting systems and processes to capture and report restated information

Data availability issues

• Historical data needed for restatement may be incomplete or no longer available
• Reconstructing past transactions and balances can be time-consuming and prone to errors
• Legacy systems may not have retained detailed information required for accurate restatement

System limitations

• Existing accounting software may not support retrospective adjustments across multiple periods
• Manual interventions and spreadsheet-based calculations increase the risk of errors
• Implementing system changes to accommodate retrospective application can be costly and disruptive

Auditor considerations

• Auditors must evaluate the appropriateness and accuracy of retrospective applications
• Requires assessment of management's process for identifying and quantifying the effects of changes
• May necessitate additional audit procedures to verify restated financial information

Stakeholder communication

• Clear and timely communication with stakeholders crucial when implementing retrospective changes
• Explain the reasons for restatement and its impact on historical and future financial performance
• Address potential concerns about the reliability of previously issued financial statements

Retrospective vs prospective application

• Retrospective application adjusts prior period financial statements; prospective applies changes only to current and future periods
• Retrospective provides better comparability but can be more complex and costly to implement
• Prospective application used for changes in accounting estimates and when retrospective application is impracticable