10.2 School-based violence prevention initiatives

School-based violence prevention initiatives target risk factors and promote protective factors to prevent youth violence. These programs include social-emotional learning, parenting skills training, and mentoring, aiming to develop skills like empathy and conflict resolution.

Evidence-based programs like Olweus Bullying Prevention and Second Step use comprehensive approaches to reduce bullying and improve school climate. These initiatives involve school-wide policies, classroom activities, and targeted interventions to create safer learning environments for students.

Early Intervention for Youth Violence

Risk and Protective Factors

Top images from around the web for Risk and Protective Factors

• 

  Prevention and Promotion – Introduction to Community Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Risk and Protective Factors in Cyberbullying: the Role of Family, Social Support and Emotion ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Prevention and Promotion – Introduction to Community Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Risk and Protective Factors in Cyberbullying: the Role of Family, Social Support and Emotion ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Risk and Protective Factors

• 

  Prevention and Promotion – Introduction to Community Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Risk and Protective Factors in Cyberbullying: the Role of Family, Social Support and Emotion ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Prevention and Promotion – Introduction to Community Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Risk and Protective Factors in Cyberbullying: the Role of Family, Social Support and Emotion ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Early intervention refers to strategies and programs implemented during childhood and adolescence to address risk factors and promote protective factors associated with violence prevention
• Risk factors for youth violence include individual factors (impulsivity, aggression), family factors (harsh parenting, domestic violence), peer factors (association with delinquent peers), and community factors (neighborhood crime, lack of resources)
• Protective factors that can mitigate the risk of youth violence include individual factors (problem-solving skills, self-control), family factors (supportive parent-child relationships, consistent discipline), peer factors (positive peer influences), and community factors (access to quality education and resources)
• Early intervention programs target these risk and protective factors to prevent the development of violent behaviors and promote positive youth development

Intervention Strategies and Programs

• Early intervention strategies include social-emotional learning programs, parenting skills training, and community-based mentoring programs
  • Social-emotional learning programs teach children skills such as emotion regulation, empathy, and conflict resolution
  • Parenting skills training programs help caregivers develop positive discipline strategies and improve parent-child communication
  • Community-based mentoring programs connect youth with positive adult role models who provide guidance and support
• Examples of early intervention programs include Big Brothers Big Sisters, which matches youth with adult mentors, and the Incredible Years, a parenting skills training program

Evidence-Based Programs for Bullying

Comprehensive School-Wide Programs

• The Olweus Bullying Prevention Program (OBPP) is a comprehensive, school-wide program that includes components such as school-level policies, classroom activities, and individual interventions to reduce bullying and improve school climate
  • School-level policies may include clear definitions of bullying, reporting procedures, and consequences for bullying behavior
  • Classroom activities focus on building empathy, respect, and social skills among students
  • Individual interventions provide support and guidance for students involved in bullying incidents, both as perpetrators and victims
• The Positive Action program is a comprehensive, school-wide program that promotes positive behaviors and reduces negative behaviors, including bullying and aggression, through a curriculum that emphasizes self-concept, physical and intellectual actions, and social/emotional skills

Targeted Interventions

• The Second Step program is a social-emotional learning curriculum that teaches students skills in empathy, emotion management, and problem-solving to prevent aggression and promote positive social behaviors
  • Lessons are delivered in a sequential manner, with each grade level building upon skills learned in previous years
  • The program includes interactive activities, role-playing, and discussion to engage students and reinforce learning
• The Responding in Peaceful and Positive Ways (RIPP) program is a conflict resolution and violence prevention program that focuses on teaching students cognitive-behavioral skills to manage anger, resolve conflicts, and resist peer pressure
  • The program includes classroom-based lessons, small group activities, and individual coaching sessions
  • Students learn strategies such as deep breathing, positive self-talk, and assertive communication to handle challenging situations
• The Good Behavior Game is a classroom-based behavior management strategy that reinforces positive behaviors and reduces disruptive and aggressive behaviors among students
  • The game involves dividing the class into teams and awarding points for displaying appropriate behaviors
  • Teams that meet behavior criteria earn rewards, such as extra recess time or special privileges

School Initiatives for Safer Learning

Evaluating Effectiveness

• Evaluating the effectiveness of school-based violence prevention initiatives involves examining their impact on various outcomes, such as reductions in bullying, aggression, and disciplinary referrals, as well as improvements in school climate and student safety
• Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for assessing the effectiveness of school-based interventions, as they allow for causal inferences about the impact of the program on targeted outcomes
  • In an RCT, schools or classrooms are randomly assigned to receive the intervention or serve as a control group
  • Outcomes are measured before and after the intervention, and differences between the intervention and control groups are analyzed
• Quasi-experimental designs, such as pre-post comparisons or matched control group designs, can also provide valuable information about the effectiveness of school-based initiatives, although they may be subject to threats to internal validity
  • Pre-post comparisons measure outcomes before and after the intervention, but do not include a control group
  • Matched control group designs pair intervention schools with similar schools that do not receive the intervention, allowing for comparisons between the two groups

Implementation and Sustainability

• Implementation fidelity, or the extent to which a program is delivered as intended, is a critical factor in determining the effectiveness of school-based initiatives and should be assessed as part of the evaluation process
  • Fidelity assessments may include observations of program delivery, surveys of program participants, and reviews of program materials and records
  • High fidelity is associated with better program outcomes, while low fidelity can reduce the impact of the intervention
• Long-term follow-up assessments are important for determining the sustainability of program effects and identifying any potential unintended consequences of the intervention
  • Follow-up assessments may be conducted several months or even years after the initial intervention to examine the durability of program effects
  • Unintended consequences may include negative effects on academic performance or increased stigmatization of at-risk students
• Cost-benefit analyses can provide valuable information about the economic impact of school-based violence prevention initiatives and inform decisions about resource allocation and program sustainability
  • These analyses compare the costs of implementing and maintaining the program with the monetary benefits of reduced violence, such as decreased healthcare costs and increased productivity
  • Programs with a positive cost-benefit ratio are more likely to be sustained over time

Educator Roles in Violence Prevention

Classroom-Level Responsibilities

• Teachers are responsible for delivering classroom-based components of violence prevention programs, such as social-emotional learning curricula or conflict resolution lessons, and modeling positive behaviors for students
  • Effective delivery of these programs requires teachers to be trained in the specific curriculum and to adapt the material to the needs of their students
  • Modeling positive behaviors, such as respectful communication and non-violent problem-solving, helps to create a classroom climate that promotes safety and well-being
• School counselors and psychologists provide individual and group-based interventions for students identified as at-risk for violence or aggression, and support the implementation of school-wide prevention efforts
  • Individual interventions may include counseling, skill-building, and referrals to community-based services
  • Group interventions may focus on specific topics, such as anger management or social skills, and provide opportunities for students to practice new behaviors in a supportive environment

School-Wide Responsibilities

• School administrators, such as principals and assistant principals, are responsible for establishing and enforcing school-wide policies and procedures related to violence prevention, such as bullying reporting systems and disciplinary protocols
  • Clear and consistent policies help to create a school climate that prioritizes safety and respect
  • Administrators also play a key role in allocating resources and providing support for violence prevention programs
• School resource officers (SROs) or security personnel are responsible for maintaining a safe school environment, responding to incidents of violence or aggression, and collaborating with school staff to implement prevention strategies
  • SROs may provide training to school staff on crisis response and de-escalation techniques
  • Collaboration between SROs and school staff helps to ensure a coordinated and comprehensive approach to violence prevention
• All school staff, including support staff such as cafeteria workers and custodians, play a role in creating a positive school climate and modeling respectful and non-violent behaviors for students
  • Support staff often have regular contact with students outside of the classroom and can serve as positive role models and mentors
  • Involving all staff in violence prevention efforts helps to create a consistent and supportive environment throughout the school
• Effective implementation of violence prevention strategies requires ongoing professional development and training for all school staff, as well as regular communication and collaboration among staff members to ensure consistency and continuity of prevention efforts
  • Professional development may include training on specific violence prevention programs, as well as general skills such as conflict resolution and cultural competency
  • Regular communication and collaboration, such as team meetings and cross-disciplinary planning, helps to ensure that all staff are working towards common goals and using consistent strategies