10.5 The Suez Crisis

The Suez Crisis of 1956 marked a turning point in Middle Eastern politics and global power dynamics. It began when Egypt's President Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal, challenging British and French control over this vital waterway.

The crisis escalated as Britain, France, and Israel launched a military intervention against Egypt. This action exposed the declining influence of European powers and highlighted the growing roles of the United States and Soviet Union in shaping international affairs.

Origins of the Suez Crisis

• The Suez Crisis was a significant event in the history of the Middle East and the decolonization process, highlighting the complex interplay of nationalism, imperialism, and Cold War politics
• The crisis originated from the long-standing British control of the Suez Canal and the growing Egyptian nationalism and anti-colonial sentiment in the mid-20th century

British control of the Suez Canal

Top images from around the web for British control of the Suez Canal

• 

  Suez Canal - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  L'inauguration du canal de Suez le 17 novembre 1869 (Insti… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Suez Canal: The Modern Maritime Wonder View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Suez Canal - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  L'inauguration du canal de Suez le 17 novembre 1869 (Insti… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for British control of the Suez Canal

• 

  Suez Canal - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  L'inauguration du canal de Suez le 17 novembre 1869 (Insti… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Suez Canal: The Modern Maritime Wonder View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Suez Canal - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  L'inauguration du canal de Suez le 17 novembre 1869 (Insti… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• The Suez Canal, opened in 1869, was a vital waterway connecting the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea, greatly reducing the distance between Europe and Asia
• The canal was owned and operated by the Suez Canal Company, a joint British-French venture, with the British government holding a significant share
• British control of the canal was seen as a symbol of colonial domination and a strategic asset for maintaining influence in the Middle East

Egyptian nationalism and anti-colonial sentiment

• In the early 20th century, Egypt was under British occupation, and the Egyptian people increasingly sought independence and self-determination
• The rise of Arab nationalism, particularly after World War II, fueled anti-colonial sentiment in Egypt and other Arab nations
• Egyptians resented the foreign control of the Suez Canal and the economic benefits it provided to the British and French, while Egypt struggled with poverty and underdevelopment

Gamal Abdel Nasser's rise to power

• Gamal Abdel Nasser, a charismatic Egyptian military officer, emerged as a leader of the nationalist movement in the 1950s
• Nasser led the Free Officers Movement, which overthrew the Egyptian monarchy in 1952 and established a republican government
• As President of Egypt, Nasser championed Arab nationalism, socialism, and anti-imperialism, gaining widespread popularity among the Egyptian people and across the Arab world

Nationalization of the Suez Canal

• The nationalization of the Suez Canal by Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser was a pivotal moment in the Suez Crisis, sparking international outrage and leading to a military confrontation
• Nasser's decision to nationalize the canal had far-reaching economic and strategic consequences, challenging the interests of Western powers in the region

Nasser's decision to nationalize the canal

• On July 26, 1956, Nasser announced the nationalization of the Suez Canal Company, transferring ownership and control of the canal to the Egyptian government
• Nasser justified the nationalization as a means to fund the construction of the Aswan High Dam, a major development project aimed at improving irrigation and generating electricity
• The nationalization was also a symbolic assertion of Egyptian sovereignty and a challenge to Western dominance in the region

International reaction to nationalization

• The British and French governments, the main shareholders in the Suez Canal Company, were outraged by Nasser's decision and viewed it as a threat to their interests
• The United States, while opposed to the nationalization, sought a diplomatic solution and pressured its allies to avoid military action
• The Soviet Union, in the context of the Cold War, supported Egypt's right to nationalize the canal and condemned Western imperialism

Economic and strategic importance of the canal

• The Suez Canal was a crucial trade route, with a significant portion of Europe's oil supply passing through it
• The canal's nationalization raised concerns about the security of maritime trade and the potential for disruption of oil supplies
• Control of the canal was also seen as a strategic asset, enabling power projection and military mobility between the Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean

Tripartite Aggression

• The Tripartite Aggression, also known as the Suez Crisis or the Suez War, was a military intervention by Britain, France, and Israel against Egypt in response to the nationalization of the Suez Canal
• The aggression was a culmination of the escalating tensions and the collusion between the three countries to regain control of the canal and undermine Nasser's regime

British, French, and Israeli collusion

• Britain and France secretly planned a military intervention to retake the Suez Canal and remove Nasser from power
• Israel, which had its own tensions with Egypt, was brought into the plan, agreeing to invade the Sinai Peninsula as a pretext for Anglo-French intervention
• The three countries coordinated their actions, with Israel launching the initial attack on October 29, 1956, followed by British and French ultimatums and subsequent airstrikes and landings

Military invasion of Egypt

• Israeli forces quickly advanced into the Sinai Peninsula, reaching the eastern bank of the Suez Canal
• British and French forces launched airstrikes against Egyptian targets and landed troops in the Canal Zone, ostensibly to separate the Egyptian and Israeli forces and protect the canal
• The Egyptian military, despite fierce resistance, was overwhelmed by the superior firepower and technology of the invading forces

United Nations response to the invasion

• The United Nations Security Council met in emergency sessions to address the crisis
• The United States, the Soviet Union, and many other countries condemned the aggression and called for an immediate ceasefire and withdrawal of foreign troops
• The UN General Assembly, under the "Uniting for Peace" resolution, established the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF) to supervise the cessation of hostilities and the withdrawal of invading forces

Global political implications

• The Suez Crisis had far-reaching global political implications, reflecting the complex dynamics of the Cold War and the shifting balance of power in the post-World War II era
• The crisis exposed the divisions among Western allies and the emerging role of the superpowers in shaping international relations

Cold War tensions and alliances

• The Suez Crisis unfolded against the backdrop of the Cold War, with the United States and the Soviet Union vying for influence in the Middle East
• The crisis strained the Western alliance, as the United States opposed the actions of its British and French allies, fearing that it would push Arab nations towards the Soviet Union
• The Soviet Union, seeing an opportunity to gain influence in the region, supported Egypt and threatened to intervene on its behalf

United States vs Soviet Union reactions

• The United States, under President Dwight D. Eisenhower, strongly condemned the Anglo-French-Israeli invasion and pressured them to withdraw
• Eisenhower believed that the aggression would undermine the United States' moral authority and its efforts to contain Soviet influence in the Middle East
• The Soviet Union, under Nikita Khrushchev, denounced the invasion as an act of imperialism and threatened to intervene militarily if the aggression continued

Shift in global power dynamics

• The Suez Crisis marked a significant shift in global power dynamics, highlighting the declining influence of European colonial powers and the rising prominence of the United States and the Soviet Union
• The crisis demonstrated that Britain and France could no longer act independently in the Middle East without the support or approval of the United States
• The outcome of the crisis also bolstered the Soviet Union's position as a champion of anti-imperialism and a supporter of nationalist movements in the developing world

Resolution and aftermath

• The resolution of the Suez Crisis involved intense diplomatic efforts to end the military confrontation and restore stability in the region
• The aftermath of the crisis had significant consequences for the parties involved and reshaped the political landscape of the Middle East

Diplomatic efforts to end the crisis

• The United States and the Soviet Union, despite their Cold War rivalry, worked together to pressure Britain, France, and Israel to accept a ceasefire and withdraw their forces
• The United Nations played a crucial role in mediating the conflict and establishing a peacekeeping force (UNEF) to oversee the withdrawal and maintain the ceasefire
• Diplomatic negotiations, including the involvement of the United States, the Soviet Union, and the United Nations Secretary-General, helped to defuse the crisis and prevent further escalation

Withdrawal of British, French, and Israeli forces

• Under intense international pressure, Britain and France agreed to a ceasefire on November 6, 1956, and began withdrawing their forces from Egypt
• Israel, facing the prospect of Soviet intervention and American pressure, also agreed to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula
• The withdrawal of foreign forces was supervised by the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF), which was deployed along the Egypt-Israel border and the Suez Canal

Suez Canal under Egyptian control

• With the withdrawal of British and French forces, the Suez Canal returned to Egyptian control
• Egypt reopened the canal to international shipping in April 1957, after clearing the wreckage and debris from the conflict
• The nationalization of the canal was internationally recognized, and Egypt agreed to compensate the former shareholders of the Suez Canal Company

Long-term consequences

• The Suez Crisis had significant long-term consequences for the parties involved and the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East
• The crisis marked a turning point in the decline of British and French influence, the rise of Arab nationalism, and the shifting balance of power in the region

Decline of British and French influence

• The Suez Crisis dealt a severe blow to the prestige and influence of Britain and France in the Middle East and globally
• The crisis exposed the limitations of British and French power in the post-World War II era and their inability to act independently without the support of the United States
• The humiliating withdrawal and the failure to achieve their objectives in Egypt accelerated the process of decolonization and the dismantling of the British and French empires

Rise of Arab nationalism and anti-Western sentiment

• The Suez Crisis and the perceived victory of Nasser over the Western powers fueled the rise of Arab nationalism and anti-Western sentiment in the Middle East
• Nasser emerged as a hero and a symbol of Arab resistance against imperialism, inspiring nationalist and anti-colonial movements across the region
• The crisis strengthened the Arab world's resolve to assert its independence and challenge Western dominance, leading to increased tensions and conflicts in the following decades

Impact on Middle Eastern geopolitics

• The Suez Crisis had a profound impact on the geopolitical dynamics of the Middle East, reshaping alliances and power structures
• The crisis weakened the Baghdad Pact, a Western-sponsored defense alliance, and pushed Egypt closer to the Soviet Union, which provided economic and military support
• The outcome of the crisis also encouraged other Arab nations to pursue nationalist policies and challenge Western interests in the region, setting the stage for future conflicts, such as the Arab-Israeli wars and the rise of Arab socialism