Advaita Vedanta explores the relationship between Brahman (ultimate reality) and Atman (individual self). It argues that these are fundamentally one, despite appearances. The philosophy challenges our usual ideas about reality and ourselves.
Understanding this connection is key to grasping Advaita Vedanta. It impacts how we see the world, ourselves, and our actions. This idea of oneness has big implications for how we live and think about life.
Brahman and Atman in Advaita Vedanta
Fundamental Concepts
Top images from around the web for Fundamental Concepts LA CIENCIA DE LOS SABIOS: LA FILOSOFÍA ADVAITA DE SRI SANKARA por Swami Sivananda View original
Is this image relevant?
Eastern philosophy - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
LA CIENCIA DE LOS SABIOS: LA FILOSOFÍA ADVAITA DE SRI SANKARA por Swami Sivananda View original
Is this image relevant?
Eastern philosophy - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Fundamental Concepts LA CIENCIA DE LOS SABIOS: LA FILOSOFÍA ADVAITA DE SRI SANKARA por Swami Sivananda View original
Is this image relevant?
Eastern philosophy - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
LA CIENCIA DE LOS SABIOS: LA FILOSOFÍA ADVAITA DE SRI SANKARA por Swami Sivananda View original
Is this image relevant?
Eastern philosophy - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Brahman embodies ultimate, absolute reality characterized as infinite, eternal, and unchanging
Described as sat-chit-ananda (existence-consciousness-bliss)
Considered nirguna (without attributes)
Atman represents individual self or soul constituting essence of an individual's being
Manifestation of Brahman in individual entities
Not separate from Brahman in Advaita Vedanta
Maya creates illusory perception of multiplicity and difference in the world
Crucial for understanding apparent distinction between Brahman and Atman
Power that veils true nature of reality
Sources and Philosophical Methods
Upanishads provide primary sources for Advaitic understanding
Mandukya Upanishad contains key statements
"Tat Tvam Asi " (That Thou Art)
"Aham Brahmasmi " (I am Brahman)
Advaita Vedanta employs various reasoning and analysis methods
Adhyaropa-apavada (superimposition and negation) elucidates nature of Brahman and Atman
Helps distinguish between ultimate reality and apparent phenomena
Ignorance and Perception
Ignorance (avidya ) causes perception of Atman as separate from Brahman
Root cause of false identification of self with body, mind, and ego
Leads to misunderstanding of true nature of reality
Overcoming ignorance reveals essential unity of Brahman and Atman
Achieved through spiritual practices and self-inquiry
Results in realization of non-dual nature of existence
Brahman-Atman Relationship in Advaita
Non-Duality Principle
Fundamental tenet asserts identity of Atman and Brahman
Not merely similar or part of Brahman
Essential oneness despite apparent differences
Analogies illustrate Brahman-Atman relationship
Wave and ocean (individual soul and universal consciousness)
Pot space and total space (limited awareness and infinite awareness)
Levels of Reality
Advaita philosophy employs three levels of reality
Paramarthika (absolute): ultimate non-dual reality of Brahman
Vyavaharika (empirical): everyday world of apparent multiplicity
Pratibhasika (illusory): false perceptions like mirages or dreams
Levels explain perceived difference between Brahman and Atman
Differentiation exists only in lower levels of reality
Ultimate reality transcends all distinctions
Philosophical Doctrines
Ajativada propounded by Gaudapada
States no real creation or dissolution
Emphasizes non-dual nature of Brahman and Atman
Vivartavada theory by Shankara
Explains world as apparent modification of Brahman
Similar to mistaking rope for snake (rope-snake analogy)
Reinforces idea that Atman is not truly separate from Brahman
Liberation and Realization
Jivanmukti (liberation while living) based on Brahman-Atman identity realization
Practical implication of understanding true nature of self
Attainable through knowledge and self-inquiry
Moksha redefined as recognition of one's true nature as Brahman
Not a state to be achieved or place to reach
Involves removal of ignorance obscuring true identity
Implications of Brahman-Atman Identity
Ontological and Epistemological Consequences
Challenges conventional notions of individuality and personal identity
Suggests ego-self as ultimately illusory
Redefines nature of consciousness and awareness
Implies non-dual nature of ultimate reality
Leads to reassessment of ontological status of phenomenal world
Questions validity of individual experiences as separate from universal consciousness
Ethical and Practical Implications
Fosters sense of universal oneness and compassion
All beings seen as manifestations of same ultimate reality
Encourages ethical behavior based on recognition of shared essence
Influences Advaitic approach to spiritual practices
Emphasizes knowledge (jnana) and self-inquiry
De-emphasizes ritualistic or devotional practices
Challenges traditional understanding of karma and rebirth
Views them as part of illusory realm of maya
Reinterprets their significance in light of non-dual reality
Philosophical Debates and Criticisms
Critics argue absolute non-dualism may lead to denial of world's reality
Potential for ethical nihilism
Questions practical implications for everyday life
Advaitins develop sophisticated responses to challenges
Explain ethical behavior as natural outcome of self-realization
Argue for provisional reality of world while maintaining ultimate non-duality
Ongoing debates within Indian philosophy
Competing schools (Dvaita, Vishishtadvaita) offer alternative interpretations
Discussions refine and clarify Advaitic concepts over time