11.9 Death penalty and wrongful convictions

The death penalty in the US has a long and complex history, marked by racial disparities and wrongful convictions. From colonial times to modern debates, capital punishment has evolved alongside changing social and legal perspectives.

Wrongful convictions in death penalty cases highlight systemic issues in the justice system. Factors like false confessions, eyewitness errors, and inadequate legal representation contribute to innocent people being sentenced to death, sparking calls for reform and abolition.

History of death penalty in US

• The death penalty has been used as a form of punishment in the United States since colonial times, with the first recorded execution taking place in 1608
• Throughout US history, various methods of execution have been employed, including hanging, firing squad, electric chair, gas chamber, and lethal injection
• In 1972, the Supreme Court case Furman v. Georgia temporarily halted executions nationwide, citing the arbitrary and discriminatory application of the death penalty as unconstitutional

Racial disparities in death penalty sentencing

Overrepresentation of minorities on death row

Top images from around the web for Overrepresentation of minorities on death row

• 

  “Justice must prevail”: a global call for freedom of US political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Race in the United States criminal justice system - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Mental Health in Arizona View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  “Justice must prevail”: a global call for freedom of US political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Race in the United States criminal justice system - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Overrepresentation of minorities on death row

• 

  “Justice must prevail”: a global call for freedom of US political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Race in the United States criminal justice system - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Mental Health in Arizona View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  “Justice must prevail”: a global call for freedom of US political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Race in the United States criminal justice system - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• African Americans and Hispanics are disproportionately represented on death row compared to their percentage of the general population
• Studies have shown that defendants are more likely to receive the death penalty if the victim is white, highlighting racial bias in sentencing
• Socioeconomic factors, such as poverty and lack of access to adequate legal representation, contribute to the overrepresentation of minorities in capital cases

Bias in jury selection and decision making

• The jury selection process, known as voir dire, has been criticized for allowing the exclusion of jurors based on race, particularly in capital cases
• Implicit racial biases held by jurors can influence their perception of a defendant's guilt and their decision to impose the death penalty
• Research has shown that all-white juries are more likely to convict and sentence defendants to death compared to racially diverse juries

Causes of wrongful convictions

False confessions and police misconduct

• False confessions can result from coercive interrogation techniques, psychological manipulation, or the desire to protect someone else
• Police misconduct, such as withholding exculpatory evidence or using suggestive lineup procedures, can lead to wrongful convictions
• High-profile cases like the Central Park Five demonstrate how false confessions can result in wrongful convictions and lengthy prison sentences

Eyewitness misidentification

• Eyewitness testimony is often considered highly persuasive by juries, but it is prone to errors and inaccuracies
• Factors such as stress, poor lighting, and the presence of weapons can impair an eyewitness's ability to accurately identify a perpetrator
• Cross-racial identifications, where the witness and perpetrator are of different races, are particularly prone to error

Flawed forensic science

• Forensic science techniques, such as hair microscopy and bite mark analysis, have been found to be unreliable and lacking scientific validity
• Misinterpretation or exaggeration of forensic evidence by experts can mislead juries and contribute to wrongful convictions
• Advancements in DNA testing have exposed flaws in other forensic disciplines and led to the exoneration of wrongfully convicted individuals

Inadequate defense representation

• Defendants in capital cases often receive inadequate legal representation due to overburdened public defenders and lack of resources
• Ineffective assistance of counsel can result in failure to investigate alibis, challenge questionable evidence, or present mitigating factors during sentencing
• The quality of legal representation can significantly impact the outcome of a death penalty case and the likelihood of a wrongful conviction

Consequences of wrongful convictions

Psychological impact on exonerees

• Wrongfully convicted individuals often experience severe psychological trauma, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety
• The psychological effects can persist long after exoneration, as exonerees struggle to rebuild their lives and reintegrate into society
• Wrongful convictions can lead to strained family relationships, difficulty finding employment, and ongoing stigma despite being proven innocent

Compensation for wrongful imprisonment

• Many states have compensation statutes that provide financial assistance to exonerees, but the amounts and eligibility requirements vary widely
• Exonerees often face challenges in securing compensation, as they must navigate complex legal processes and prove their innocence
• Even when compensation is awarded, it may not adequately address the years of lost wages, educational opportunities, and emotional suffering endured by exonerees

Erosion of public trust in justice system

• Wrongful convictions undermine public confidence in the fairness and accuracy of the criminal justice system
• High-profile exonerations, particularly in death penalty cases, can lead to increased scrutiny of the system and calls for reform
• The erosion of trust can disproportionately impact communities of color, who are more likely to experience wrongful convictions and have historical reasons for distrusting the justice system

Efforts to prevent wrongful executions

Moratorium on executions

• Some states have implemented moratoriums on executions in response to concerns about wrongful convictions and the fairness of the death penalty
• Moratoriums provide an opportunity to review and reform the capital punishment system, including investigating potentially wrongful convictions
• Illinois and Pennsylvania are examples of states that have previously imposed moratoriums on executions due to concerns about the reliability of the death penalty

Improved access to DNA testing and evidence

• Advancements in DNA testing have played a crucial role in exonerating wrongfully convicted individuals, particularly in cases where biological evidence is available
• Many states have passed laws granting defendants access to post-conviction DNA testing, recognizing its potential to prove innocence
• Organizations like the Innocence Project have worked to secure DNA testing for inmates and have successfully exonerated numerous individuals based on DNA evidence

Increased scrutiny of death penalty cases

• Courts and legal organizations have called for heightened scrutiny of death penalty cases to minimize the risk of wrongful executions
• This increased scrutiny includes more thorough review of evidence, investigation of claims of innocence, and consideration of mitigating factors during sentencing
• The American Bar Association has established guidelines for the appointment and performance of defense counsel in death penalty cases to ensure adequate representation

Debates on death penalty vs life imprisonment

Deterrence and public safety arguments

• Proponents of the death penalty argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime and helps protect public safety by permanently incapacitating dangerous offenders
• However, studies on the deterrent effect of the death penalty have yielded mixed results, with many finding no conclusive evidence that it reduces crime rates more effectively than life imprisonment
• Critics argue that the irreversibility of the death penalty, coupled with the risk of wrongful executions, outweighs any potential deterrent benefits

Cost of capital punishment vs life sentences

• The costs associated with the death penalty, including lengthy appeals processes and specialized housing for death row inmates, often exceed those of life imprisonment
• Studies have shown that the average cost of a death penalty case, from trial to execution, can be significantly higher than the cost of life imprisonment without parole
• Some argue that the resources spent on the death penalty could be better allocated towards crime prevention, victim services, and improving the criminal justice system as a whole

Moral and religious perspectives on executions

• The morality of the death penalty is a contentious issue, with arguments rooted in various philosophical and religious beliefs
• Opponents argue that the death penalty violates the sanctity of human life and that it is unethical for the state to take a life, even in response to heinous crimes
• Some religious traditions, such as Catholic social teaching, have increasingly opposed the death penalty, emphasizing the possibility of redemption and the value of all human life

Exoneration and release process

Role of Innocence Projects and advocacy groups

• Innocence Projects, both at the state and national level, have been instrumental in investigating and litigating cases of wrongful conviction
• These organizations provide legal assistance, conduct investigations, and work to secure DNA testing and other evidence that can prove a defendant's innocence
• Advocacy groups also play a crucial role in raising awareness about wrongful convictions, lobbying for policy reforms, and providing support services to exonerees

Challenges in overturning wrongful convictions

• The process of overturning a wrongful conviction can be lengthy, complex, and fraught with obstacles, particularly in cases without DNA evidence
• Procedural barriers, such as statutes of limitations and restrictions on post-conviction appeals, can make it difficult for defendants to present new evidence of innocence
• Resistance from prosecutors and courts to admitting error and overturning convictions can further complicate the exoneration process

Reintegration support for exonerees

• Exonerees often face significant challenges in rebuilding their lives after release, including finding housing, employment, and accessing healthcare and education
• Many states lack comprehensive reentry services and support specifically tailored to the needs of exonerees, who may have spent decades in prison
• Organizations like the Innocence Project and local reentry programs work to provide exonerees with assistance in navigating the challenges of reintegration and rebuilding their lives

International perspectives on death penalty

Countries that have abolished capital punishment

• A majority of countries worldwide have abolished the death penalty in law or practice, with over 100 countries having completely abolished it for all crimes
• Notable examples include Canada, Australia, and all European Union member states, which have rejected the death penalty as a violation of human rights
• The trend towards abolition reflects a growing international consensus against the use of capital punishment

Human rights and cruel/unusual punishment arguments

• International human rights organizations, such as Amnesty International and the United Nations, have consistently opposed the death penalty as a violation of the right to life and the prohibition of cruel, inhuman, or degrading punishment
• The risk of wrongful executions and the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities are seen as incompatible with international human rights standards
• The use of the death penalty for non-violent crimes, such as drug offenses, has also been criticized as a violation of international law and human rights norms

Impact of wrongful convictions on global opinion

• Wrongful convictions and the risk of executing innocent individuals have contributed to the growing international opposition to the death penalty
• High-profile exonerations and cases of wrongful execution have garnered global attention and sparked calls for the abolition of capital punishment
• The United States' continued use of the death penalty, despite the prevalence of wrongful convictions, has drawn criticism from the international community and strained diplomatic relations with abolitionist countries