11.2 Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation Methods

Evaluating theater for social change requires a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative approaches like interviews and observations provide rich, detailed insights into participants' experiences and perspectives. These methods help uncover nuanced impacts that might be missed by numbers alone.

Quantitative methods like surveys and statistical analysis offer measurable data on the performance's effects. By combining both approaches, researchers can paint a comprehensive picture of how theater influences social change, balancing personal stories with hard data to assess overall impact.

Qualitative Methods

Interviews and Focus Groups

Top images from around the web for Interviews and Focus Groups

• 

  When To Use a Focus Group and When Not To | Mozilla UX View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Planning, monitoring and evaluation - supporting constructive change and social learning View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Workshop: Hacking human centred design for social change | FabRiders View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  When To Use a Focus Group and When Not To | Mozilla UX View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Planning, monitoring and evaluation - supporting constructive change and social learning View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Interviews and Focus Groups

• 

  When To Use a Focus Group and When Not To | Mozilla UX View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Planning, monitoring and evaluation - supporting constructive change and social learning View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Workshop: Hacking human centred design for social change | FabRiders View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  When To Use a Focus Group and When Not To | Mozilla UX View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Planning, monitoring and evaluation - supporting constructive change and social learning View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Interviews involve one-on-one conversations with participants to gather in-depth insights and personal experiences related to the impact of the theater performance
• Focus groups bring together a small group of participants to discuss their reactions, opinions, and experiences in a guided discussion format
• Both methods allow for open-ended questions and the exploration of participants' subjective experiences and perspectives
• Interviews and focus groups can provide rich, detailed data that helps understand the nuances of how the theater performance affected individuals (audience members, performers, or community members)

Observational and Ethnographic Approaches

• Participant observation involves the researcher actively engaging in the theater performance or related activities to gain firsthand experience and insights
• Ethnographic research entails immersing oneself in the community or context where the theater performance takes place to understand the cultural, social, and environmental factors that influence its impact
• These methods allow researchers to observe and document behaviors, interactions, and reactions in a natural setting
• Observational and ethnographic approaches can help uncover unspoken or subtle aspects of the theater performance's impact that may not be captured through other methods (group dynamics, nonverbal communication, or community norms)

Content Analysis

• Content analysis involves systematically examining and interpreting various forms of communication related to the theater performance (scripts, promotional materials, audience feedback, or media coverage)
• This method helps identify themes, patterns, and meanings that emerge from the content and can provide insights into the intended messages, values, and impact of the theater performance
• Content analysis can be applied to both qualitative data (open-ended responses, interviews, or observations) and quantitative data (frequency of certain words, themes, or sentiments)
• By analyzing the content produced by the theater performance and its stakeholders, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the intended and perceived impact of the performance

Quantitative Methods

Surveys and Assessments

• Surveys involve collecting data from a large sample of participants using standardized questionnaires or online forms
• Pre and post-performance assessments measure changes in participants' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors before and after experiencing the theater performance
• These methods allow for the collection of numerical data that can be statistically analyzed to identify trends, patterns, and relationships
• Surveys and assessments can help quantify the impact of the theater performance on specific outcomes of interest (awareness, empathy, or intention to take action)

Statistical Analysis

• Statistical analysis involves using mathematical techniques to summarize, interpret, and draw conclusions from quantitative data collected through surveys or assessments
• Common statistical methods include descriptive statistics (mean, median, standard deviation), inferential statistics (t-tests, ANOVA, regression), and effect size calculations (Cohen's d, odds ratios)
• Statistical analysis helps determine the significance, magnitude, and direction of the theater performance's impact on the targeted outcomes
• By applying rigorous statistical methods, researchers can provide evidence-based conclusions about the effectiveness of the theater performance in achieving its intended social change goals

Combined Approaches

Mixed Methods and Data Triangulation

• A mixed methods approach involves integrating both qualitative and quantitative methods to gain a comprehensive understanding of the theater performance's impact
• This approach capitalizes on the strengths of each method while compensating for their limitations, providing a more robust and nuanced evaluation
• Data triangulation refers to the use of multiple data sources, methods, or researchers to cross-validate findings and enhance the credibility and validity of the evaluation results
• By combining qualitative insights with quantitative measurements and comparing findings across different methods or sources, researchers can develop a more accurate and trustworthy assessment of the theater performance's impact (interviews, surveys, and participant observations)