The Savings and Loan crisis was a pivotal event in American financial history. It exposed flaws in the S&L industry's business model and regulatory framework, leading to widespread failures and a costly government in the 1980s and early 1990s.
The crisis stemmed from economic challenges, , and risky lending practices. It reshaped the banking landscape, prompting stricter regulations and industry consolidation. The S&L crisis offers valuable lessons on financial oversight and risk management that remain relevant today.
Origins of S&L industry
Savings and Loan (S&L) institutions emerged in the 19th century as community-based financial organizations focused on promoting homeownership
S&Ls played a crucial role in shaping the American housing market and contributed to the growth of suburban communities
The industry's development reflects broader trends in American business history, including the rise of consumer finance and the government's role in economic policy
Great Depression reforms
Top images from around the web for Great Depression reforms
Introduction to the Federal Reserve | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original
Is this image relevant?
Banks, Loan Finance, and the Payments System | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original
Is this image relevant?
Home Owners' Loan Corporation - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Introduction to the Federal Reserve | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original
Is this image relevant?
Banks, Loan Finance, and the Payments System | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Great Depression reforms
Introduction to the Federal Reserve | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original
Is this image relevant?
Banks, Loan Finance, and the Payments System | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original
Is this image relevant?
Home Owners' Loan Corporation - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Introduction to the Federal Reserve | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original
Is this image relevant?
Banks, Loan Finance, and the Payments System | Macroeconomics with Prof. Dolar View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Banking Act of 1933 established the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) to insure S&L deposits
Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) created to refinance distressed mortgages and prevent foreclosures
Federal Home Loan Bank System established to provide liquidity to S&Ls
These reforms aimed to stabilize the housing market and restore public confidence in financial institutions
Post-war housing boom
G.I. Bill of 1944 provided low-interest mortgages to returning veterans, stimulating housing demand
S&Ls became primary lenders for suburban home construction and purchases
Rapid expansion of S&L industry with assets growing from 8.7billionin1945to45.7 billion in 1960
S&Ls specialized in offering long-term, fixed-rate mortgages, aligning with the American dream of homeownership
Regulatory environment
S&L industry operated under a unique regulatory framework designed to promote homeownership and community development
Regulations shaped the business model of S&Ls, influencing their ability to compete with other financial institutions
The regulatory environment for S&Ls reflects the broader trend of government intervention in the financial sector during the mid-20th century
Interest rate ceilings
Regulation Q imposed caps on interest rates S&Ls could offer on deposits
Intended to prevent excessive competition and ensure stability in the banking system
Created a competitive disadvantage for S&Ls when market interest rates rose above the ceiling
Led to disintermediation as depositors sought higher returns elsewhere (money market funds)
Restrictions on investments
S&Ls limited primarily to residential mortgages and government securities
Prohibited from offering checking accounts until 1980
Geographic restrictions on lending, typically confined to local communities
Asset-liability mismatch created by long-term, fixed-rate mortgages funded by short-term deposits
Economic factors
Macroeconomic conditions in the 1970s and early 1980s significantly impacted the S&L industry
Economic challenges exposed vulnerabilities in the S&L business model and regulatory framework
These factors set the stage for the subsequent crisis and reflect broader trends in American economic history
Inflation in 1970s
Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose from 3.2% in 1972 to 13.5% in 1980
S&Ls faced increasing costs as interest rates on deposits rose with inflation
Value of long-term, fixed-rate mortgages eroded in real terms
Net worth of many S&Ls declined as assets lost value faster than liabilities
Volcker shock
Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker raised interest rates to combat inflation in 1979
Federal funds rate peaked at 20% in June 1981
Created severe financial strain for S&Ls with portfolios of low-yielding mortgages
Many S&Ls became insolvent on a market-value basis but remained open due to regulatory forbearance
Deregulation and consequences
Policymakers responded to S&L industry challenges with a series of deregulatory measures
Deregulation aimed to increase S&L competitiveness and profitability
These changes fundamentally altered the S&L business model and risk profile
Reflects broader trends of financial deregulation in the 1980s under the Reagan administration
Garn-St Germain Act
Passed in 1982 to address S&L industry challenges
Eliminated deposit interest rate ceilings, allowing S&Ls to compete for funds
Increased federal deposit insurance limits from 40,000to100,000 per account
Relaxed restrictions on loan-to-value ratios and allowed
Expanded S&L powers
S&Ls permitted to diversify into commercial real estate lending and consumer loans
Authorized to invest up to 40% of assets in commercial mortgages
Allowed to offer demand deposits and engage in credit card operations
Reduced net worth requirements, enabling S&Ls to operate with lower capital ratios
Crisis unfolds
The S&L crisis emerged as a result of economic factors, regulatory changes, and industry practices
Rapid expansion and risk-taking by S&Ls led to widespread insolvencies
The crisis represents a significant episode in American financial history, highlighting the dangers of and regulatory failure
Risky lending practices
S&Ls engaged in speculative commercial real estate lending and junk bond investments
Brokered deposits used to fund rapid growth and high-risk ventures
Land flips and other fraudulent schemes employed to inflate asset values
Inadequate underwriting standards and poor risk management led to mounting loan losses
Real estate market collapse
Oversupply of commercial real estate in many markets (office buildings, shopping centers)
Tax Reform Act of 1986 eliminated key real estate tax shelters, reducing property values
Regional economic downturns (oil price collapse in Texas, defense spending cuts in California)
Widespread defaults on commercial real estate loans held by S&Ls
Government response
Federal regulators and policymakers implemented various measures to address the S&L crisis
The government response aimed to stabilize the financial system and protect depositors
These actions had significant implications for taxpayers and the structure of the financial industry
FIRREA legislation
(FIRREA) passed in 1989
Abolished the Federal Home Loan Bank Board and created the
Established the (RTC) to manage and sell assets of failed S&Ls
Imposed stricter capital requirements and lending restrictions on surviving S&Ls
Resolution Trust Corporation
RTC tasked with resolving 747 insolvent S&Ls between 1989 and 1995
Employed various resolution methods (purchase and assumption, insured deposit transfers)
Managed the sale of over $400 billion in assets from failed institutions
Innovative approaches to asset disposition (securitization, bulk sales, equity partnerships)
Bailout and costs
The S&L crisis required a massive government intervention to protect depositors and stabilize the financial system
The bailout represents one of the largest financial rescue operations in U.S. history
The costs and consequences of the crisis had long-lasting effects on the economy and public policy
Taxpayer burden
Total cost of the S&L bailout estimated at 124billionto132 billion
Approximately $87 billion paid directly by U.S. taxpayers through FSLIC and RTC funding
Additional costs borne by the thrift industry through higher deposit insurance premiums
Represented a significant portion of the federal budget deficit in the early 1990s
Long-term economic impact
Contributed to the 1990-1991 recession by restricting credit availability
Reduced public confidence in financial institutions and regulators
Led to consolidation in the banking industry as many S&Ls were acquired by commercial banks
Influenced subsequent debates on financial regulation and government intervention in markets
Key figures and institutions
The S&L crisis involved numerous individuals and organizations that played significant roles
Examining these key players provides insight into the complex dynamics of the crisis
The actions of these figures and institutions highlight issues of corporate governance, regulatory oversight, and political influence
Charles Keating
Chairman of Lincoln Savings and Loan Association in Irvine, California
Engaged in high-risk investments and alleged fraudulent activities
Involved in the "" scandal, where five U.S. senators were accused of improper intervention
Lincoln's failure in 1989 cost taxpayers $3.4 billion, one of the largest losses in the S&L crisis
Lincoln Savings and Loan
Acquired by 's American Continental Corporation in 1984
Grew rapidly from 1.1billioninassetsin1984to5.5 billion in 1988
Invested heavily in junk bonds and speculative real estate projects
Sold uninsured subordinated debentures to depositors, leading to significant losses for many investors
Lessons and legacy
The S&L crisis provided valuable lessons for policymakers, regulators, and financial institutions
The aftermath of the crisis led to significant changes in the regulatory landscape and industry practices
These lessons continue to influence debates on financial regulation and risk management
Financial regulation reforms
Stricter capital requirements implemented for depository institutions
Enhanced supervisory and enforcement powers granted to regulators
Improved accounting standards and disclosure requirements for financial institutions
Creation of the prompt corrective action framework to address troubled banks earlier
Impact on banking industry
Consolidation of the banking sector as many S&Ls were acquired by commercial banks
Shift away from the traditional S&L model of portfolio lending towards securitization
Increased focus on risk management and internal controls within financial institutions
Greater emphasis on diversification and liquidity management in bank operations
S&L crisis vs 2008 financial crisis
Comparing the S&L crisis to the 2008 financial crisis reveals important similarities and differences
Both crises highlight recurring issues in financial regulation and risk management
Understanding these parallels and distinctions provides valuable context for analyzing financial crises
Similarities in causes
Both crises rooted in real estate market speculation and lax lending standards
Regulatory failures and inadequate oversight contributed to both crises
Financial innovation and deregulation played roles in amplifying risks
Moral hazard issues arising from government guarantees and implicit bailout expectations
Differences in scale
2008 crisis involved a broader range of financial institutions and markets
Systemic risk more pronounced in 2008 due to interconnectedness of global financial system
Complexity of financial instruments (CDOs, CDSs) greater in 2008 crisis
Government response in 2008 more extensive, including unconventional monetary policy measures
Cultural impact
The S&L crisis left a lasting impression on American culture and society
Public perceptions of financial institutions and government regulators were significantly affected
The crisis inspired various cultural representations that reflected and shaped public understanding
Public perception of banks
Erosion of trust in financial institutions and their leaders
Increased skepticism towards claims of financial expertise and self-regulation
Greater public awareness of the potential for fraud and mismanagement in banking
Calls for stronger consumer protection measures and financial literacy education
Representations in media
Films like "Wall Street" (1987) reflected the era's financial excesses and moral ambiguity
Books such as "The Best Way to Rob a Bank Is to Own One" by William K. Black examined the crisis
Television shows (L.A. Law) incorporated storylines related to S&L failures and financial fraud
Political cartoons and satirical works critiqued the government's handling of the crisis