11.5 Shield laws and reporter's privilege

Shield laws protect journalists from revealing confidential sources, recognizing the importance of a free press. These laws vary by state, with some offering stronger protections than others. They aim to encourage sources to come forward and allow journalists to report on sensitive topics without fear of legal repercussions.

Reporter's privilege is a legal concept that allows journalists to refuse to disclose confidential sources or information in court. This privilege is based on the First Amendment but isn't absolute. It can be overcome in certain circumstances, such as when information is critical to a criminal case or national security.

Shield laws in the US

• Shield laws protect journalists from being compelled to reveal confidential sources or information gathered during the newsgathering process
• These laws recognize the importance of a free press and the need for journalists to maintain the confidentiality of their sources to effectively report on matters of public interest
• Shield laws vary by state, with some providing stronger protections than others

Purpose of shield laws

Top images from around the web for Purpose of shield laws

• 

  File:Freedom of Speech Includes The Press (32451481695).jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SoE08: Paul Dacre’s speech – in pictorial form | Editors Blog | Journalism.co.uk View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  On World Press Freedom Day, Journalism Increasingly Faces Digital and Physical Threats – Global ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Freedom of Speech Includes The Press (32451481695).jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SoE08: Paul Dacre’s speech – in pictorial form | Editors Blog | Journalism.co.uk View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Purpose of shield laws

• 

  File:Freedom of Speech Includes The Press (32451481695).jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SoE08: Paul Dacre’s speech – in pictorial form | Editors Blog | Journalism.co.uk View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  On World Press Freedom Day, Journalism Increasingly Faces Digital and Physical Threats – Global ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Freedom of Speech Includes The Press (32451481695).jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SoE08: Paul Dacre’s speech – in pictorial form | Editors Blog | Journalism.co.uk View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Encourage sources to come forward with information by ensuring their confidentiality will be protected
• Allow journalists to gather and report on sensitive or controversial topics without fear of legal repercussions
• Preserve the independence and integrity of the press by limiting government interference in the newsgathering process
• Uphold the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press

States with shield laws

• As of 2021, 40 states and the District of Columbia have enacted shield laws that provide varying degrees of protection for journalists
• Some states, such as California and New York, have strong shield laws that offer broad protections for journalists and their sources
• Other states, like Florida and Illinois, have more limited shield laws that only apply in certain circumstances or to specific types of information

States without shield laws

• 10 states, including Wyoming and Mississippi, do not have any form of shield law in place
• In these states, journalists may have to rely on common law privileges or constitutional arguments to protect their sources
• The lack of shield laws can create uncertainty for journalists and their sources, potentially chilling important reporting on matters of public concern

Federal shield law attempts

• Despite numerous attempts, Congress has not yet passed a federal shield law that would provide uniform protections for journalists across the country
• The Free Flow of Information Act, which would have established a federal reporter's privilege, was introduced in Congress multiple times but failed to pass
• Advocates argue that a federal shield law is necessary to provide consistent protections for journalists and their sources, particularly in an era of increased government surveillance and leak prosecutions

Reporter's privilege

• Reporter's privilege is a legal concept that allows journalists to refuse to disclose confidential sources or information in court or to government authorities
• This privilege is based on the idea that journalists need to be able to gather and report on information without fear of legal consequences or interference
• Reporter's privilege is not absolute and can be overcome in certain circumstances, such as when the information is critical to a criminal case or national security

Definition of reporter's privilege

• Reporter's privilege is a legal protection that shields journalists from being compelled to reveal confidential sources or information obtained during the newsgathering process
• This privilege is rooted in the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press and the recognition that journalists play a vital role in informing the public
• The scope and strength of reporter's privilege vary by jurisdiction, with some states providing more robust protections than others

Importance for confidential sources

• Confidential sources are often essential for journalists to uncover important stories and hold those in power accountable
• Many sources would be unwilling to come forward with sensitive or controversial information if they feared their identities would be revealed
• Reporter's privilege allows journalists to build trust with their sources and gather information that might otherwise remain hidden from the public eye
• Without the ability to protect confidential sources, journalists argue that the free flow of information and the public's right to know would be severely compromised

Limitations of reporter's privilege

• Reporter's privilege is not absolute and can be overcome in certain circumstances, particularly when the information sought is critical to a criminal case or matters of national security
• Courts may require journalists to disclose confidential information if it is determined to be necessary and unavailable from other sources
• Some jurisdictions only extend reporter's privilege to professional journalists, excluding bloggers, citizen journalists, or other non-traditional media creators
• The lack of a federal shield law means that protections for journalists can vary widely depending on the state or jurisdiction in which they work

Qualified vs absolute privilege

• There are two main types of reporter's privilege: qualified privilege and absolute privilege
• The type of privilege available to journalists can significantly impact their ability to protect confidential sources and information

Differences in protections

• Qualified privilege provides some protection for journalists but can be overcome if certain conditions are met
  • Courts typically apply a balancing test, weighing the need for the information against the potential harm to the free flow of information
  • Factors considered may include the relevance of the information, the availability of alternative sources, and the public interest in the story
• Absolute privilege provides nearly complete protection for journalists, barring only the most exceptional circumstances
  • Under absolute privilege, courts cannot compel journalists to reveal confidential sources or information, even if it is relevant to a criminal case or other pressing matter
  • This level of protection is rare and only available in a handful of states

States with qualified privilege

• Most states with shield laws provide qualified privilege, which allows courts to compel disclosure of confidential information under certain circumstances
• Examples of states with qualified privilege include Texas, Ohio, and Washington
• In these states, journalists may still be required to reveal their sources if a court determines that the need for the information outweighs the potential harm to the free flow of information

States with absolute privilege

• A small number of states, such as Nebraska and Oregon, provide absolute privilege for journalists
• In these states, courts cannot compel journalists to disclose confidential sources or information, except in the most extraordinary circumstances (such as when the journalist is an eyewitness to a crime)
• Absolute privilege offers the strongest protection for journalists and their sources but is not the norm across the United States

Branzburg v. Hayes

• Branzburg v. Hayes is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of reporter's privilege and the extent to which journalists can protect confidential sources
• The case involved three consolidated cases in which journalists were subpoenaed to testify before grand juries about confidential sources or information related to criminal activity

Background of the case

• In 1971, Paul Branzburg, a reporter for the Louisville Courier-Journal, wrote articles about drug use and drug trafficking in Kentucky, relying on confidential sources
• Branzburg was subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury about his sources and the criminal activity he had witnessed, but he refused, citing reporter's privilege
• Two other cases, In re Pappas and United States v. Caldwell, involved similar situations where journalists were subpoenaed to testify about confidential sources or information

Supreme Court decision

• In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that journalists do not have a First Amendment right to refuse to testify before a grand jury about confidential sources or information
• The Court acknowledged the importance of a free press but held that the public interest in law enforcement and effective grand jury proceedings outweighed the burden on newsgathering
• However, the Court also recognized that Congress and state legislatures could enact shield laws to protect journalists and their sources

Impact on reporter's privilege

• The Branzburg decision was a setback for advocates of strong reporter's privilege, as it established that journalists do not have an absolute First Amendment right to protect their sources
• However, the decision also led to the development of shield laws in many states, as legislatures sought to provide statutory protections for journalists
• Lower courts have interpreted Branzburg in different ways, with some recognizing a qualified reporter's privilege in certain circumstances
• The lack of a clear federal standard for reporter's privilege has led to ongoing debates about the appropriate balance between press freedom and other competing interests

Applying shield laws

• The application of shield laws can be complex, as courts must determine who qualifies as a journalist and what information is protected
• These determinations can have significant implications for the ability of journalists to gather and report on sensitive or controversial topics

Determining who is a journalist

• Shield laws often define who qualifies as a journalist, but these definitions can vary widely by state
• Some states, like California, have broad definitions that include traditional and non-traditional media creators, such as bloggers and freelancers
• Other states, like New York, have more narrow definitions that may exclude certain types of journalists or require them to be professionally employed
• The rise of citizen journalism and online media has complicated the question of who should be protected under shield laws

Scope of protected information

• Shield laws also vary in terms of what information is protected from disclosure
• Some states, like Nebraska, provide broad protection for all information obtained during the newsgathering process, including unpublished notes and materials
• Other states, like Florida, only protect the identity of confidential sources and not the information itself
• Courts may also consider whether the information was obtained under a promise of confidentiality or whether it is central to the case at hand

Overcoming the privilege

• Even in states with strong shield laws, the privilege is not absolute and can be overcome in certain circumstances
• Courts typically apply a balancing test, weighing the need for the information against the potential harm to the free flow of information
• Factors that may be considered include the relevance of the information, the availability of alternative sources, and the public interest in the story
• In some cases, such as when a journalist has witnessed a crime or has information critical to a criminal case, courts may compel disclosure of confidential information

Shield laws and the First Amendment

• Shield laws are often seen as an important tool for protecting the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press
• However, the relationship between shield laws and the First Amendment is complex, and courts have grappled with how to balance press freedom with other competing interests

Free press considerations

• The First Amendment's protection of freedom of the press is based on the idea that a free and independent media is essential for a functioning democracy
• Journalists argue that the ability to protect confidential sources is crucial for gathering and reporting on important stories that might otherwise remain hidden
• Without strong protections for journalists, advocates worry that the free flow of information and the public's right to know would be severely compromised

Balancing with other interests

• While the First Amendment provides strong protections for freedom of the press, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced against other important interests
• In some cases, such as when national security or the integrity of the judicial process is at stake, courts may determine that the need for information outweighs the potential harm to press freedom
• Shield laws attempt to strike a balance between these competing interests by providing some level of protection for journalists while still allowing for disclosure in certain circumstances
• The ongoing debate over shield laws reflects the tension between the need for a free and independent press and the legitimate interests of law enforcement and the judicial system

Recent shield law developments

• In recent years, there have been several notable developments related to shield laws and reporter's privilege
• These developments reflect ongoing efforts to strengthen protections for journalists and their sources in an era of increased government surveillance and leak prosecutions

Federal shield law proposals

• Despite numerous attempts, Congress has not yet passed a federal shield law that would provide uniform protections for journalists across the country
• In 2017, the Free Flow of Information Act was reintroduced in the House of Representatives but failed to gain traction
• Advocates argue that a federal shield law is necessary to provide consistent protections for journalists and their sources, particularly in light of inconsistent state laws and the lack of clear Supreme Court guidance

State legislative changes

• Several states have recently strengthened their shield laws or enacted new protections for journalists
• In 2019, Arkansas passed a new shield law that provides qualified privilege for journalists and their sources
• In 2020, Virginia amended its shield law to extend protections to non-traditional media creators, such as bloggers and freelancers
• These changes reflect a growing recognition of the importance of shield laws in an evolving media landscape

Notable court cases

• Recent court cases have continued to test the boundaries of reporter's privilege and the application of shield laws
• In 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that a reporter for BuzzFeed News could not be compelled to disclose the source of a leaked document in a defamation case
• In 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court's decision to quash a subpoena seeking to compel a journalist to reveal confidential sources in a civil case
• These cases demonstrate the ongoing relevance of shield laws and the challenges courts face in balancing press freedom with other interests