11.2 Validation and verification of candidate biomarkers

Biomarker validation and verification are crucial steps in proteomics research. These processes ensure the accuracy and reliability of potential biomarkers for diseases like cancer or Alzheimer's, reducing false results and increasing confidence in clinical applications.

The process involves multiple stages, from preclinical studies to regulatory approval. Targeted proteomics techniques like Selected Reaction Monitoring and Parallel Reaction Monitoring play key roles in verifying biomarkers, offering high specificity and sensitivity for quantifying low-abundance proteins.

Biomarker Validation and Verification Process

Biomarker validation and verification concepts

Top images from around the web for Biomarker validation and verification concepts

• 

  Frontiers | microRNA-Based Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Proteomics Approaches for Biomarker and Drug Target Discovery in ALS and FTD View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | An Integrated Quantitative Proteomics Workflow for Cancer Biomarker Discovery and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | microRNA-Based Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Proteomics Approaches for Biomarker and Drug Target Discovery in ALS and FTD View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Biomarker validation and verification concepts

• 

  Frontiers | microRNA-Based Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Proteomics Approaches for Biomarker and Drug Target Discovery in ALS and FTD View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | An Integrated Quantitative Proteomics Workflow for Cancer Biomarker Discovery and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | microRNA-Based Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Proteomics Approaches for Biomarker and Drug Target Discovery in ALS and FTD View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Biomarker validation confirms ability to measure biological state accurately and reliably through extensive testing and evaluation (cancer diagnosis, drug response)
• Biomarker verification assesses candidate biomarker potential utility preliminarily before full-scale validation studies (protein biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease)
• Importance ensures accuracy, reduces false results, increases confidence in clinical applications, identifies limitations (cardiovascular disease risk assessment)

Stages of biomarker validation

1. Preclinical studies utilize in vitro experiments and animal models to assess biomarker potential (cell culture assays, mouse models)
2. Analytical validation develops and optimizes assays, determines specificity and sensitivity (ELISA, mass spectrometry)
3. Clinical validation conducts retrospective studies with archived samples and prospective studies with new patient cohorts (breast cancer biomarker studies)
4. Clinical utility studies assess biomarker impact on patient outcomes and analyze cost-effectiveness (prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer screening)
5. Regulatory approval submits validation data to agencies for clinical use approval (FDA, EMA)

Targeted proteomics in biomarker verification

• Selected Reaction Monitoring monitors specific peptides and fragment ions enabling quantification of low-abundance proteins (PSA, troponin)
• Parallel Reaction Monitoring simultaneously monitors all fragment ions of target peptide providing improved selectivity (thyroglobulin, insulin-like growth factor)
• Advantages include high specificity and sensitivity, ability to multiplex biomarkers, reduced sample complexity, improved reproducibility and quantification accuracy

Statistical methods for biomarker performance

• Sensitivity measures proportion of true positive results correctly identified $True Positives / (True Positives + False Negatives)$
• Specificity measures proportion of true negative results correctly identified $True Negatives / (True Negatives + False Positives)$
• Receiver Operating Characteristic curves plot true positive rate against false positive rate, Area Under Curve quantifies overall performance
• Positive Predictive Value determines probability of true positive test result
• Negative Predictive Value determines probability of true negative test result
• Likelihood ratios assess diagnostic test performance (positive: $sensitivity / (1 - specificity)$, negative: $(1 - sensitivity) / specificity$)