12.7 Consolidation and ownership trends

Media ownership is changing rapidly, with fewer companies controlling more outlets. This consolidation impacts newsrooms, potentially limiting diversity and local coverage. However, it can also lead to increased resources and wider reach for news stories.

The effects of ownership on news content are significant. Corporate interests may influence coverage, while editorial independence becomes crucial. Balancing these factors is essential for maintaining journalistic integrity and serving the public interest.

Consolidation in media industry

• Consolidation refers to the trend of fewer companies owning an increasing share of media outlets, leading to a more concentrated and less diverse media landscape
• In the television newsroom context, consolidation can impact the resources available to journalists, the editorial independence of news organizations, and the range of perspectives and viewpoints represented in news coverage
• Consolidation is driven by various factors, including the desire for increased market share, cost savings through economies of scale, and the ability to leverage content across multiple platforms (television, online, print)

Impact of consolidation on newsrooms

Top images from around the web for Impact of consolidation on newsrooms

• 

  SC_layoffs - Policy Options View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Layoffs Return to pre-Pandemic Levels, but Impacts Remain View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SC_layoffs - Policy Options View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Layoffs Return to pre-Pandemic Levels, but Impacts Remain View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Impact of consolidation on newsrooms

• 

  SC_layoffs - Policy Options View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Layoffs Return to pre-Pandemic Levels, but Impacts Remain View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SC_layoffs - Policy Options View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Layoffs Return to pre-Pandemic Levels, but Impacts Remain View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Consolidated ownership can lead to standardization of news content and formats across multiple outlets, reducing local flavor and diversity
• Centralized decision-making may limit the autonomy of individual newsrooms to pursue stories and angles relevant to their specific communities
• Consolidation can result in layoffs and budget cuts, as companies seek to maximize efficiency and profitability, potentially compromising the quality and depth of news coverage
• Increased pressure to produce content that appeals to a broad audience may lead to a focus on sensationalism and entertainment over substantive reporting

Pros vs cons of media consolidation

• Pros:
  • Economies of scale can allow for increased investment in resources and technology
  • Cross-promotion and content sharing across multiple platforms can expand the reach of news stories
  • Consolidated companies may have greater bargaining power with advertisers and distributors
• Cons:
  • Reduced competition can lead to less diverse perspectives and a narrower range of voices in the media
  • Corporate interests may influence editorial decisions, compromising journalistic integrity
  • Local news coverage may suffer as resources are diverted to national or international stories
  • Concentration of media power in the hands of a few companies can have negative implications for democracy and the free exchange of ideas

Types of media ownership

Corporate ownership

• Media outlets owned by large, publicly-traded companies with diverse business interests (Comcast, Disney, Viacom)
• Corporate owners may prioritize financial performance and shareholder value over journalistic principles
• Potential for conflicts of interest when reporting on issues that affect the parent company's other business ventures
• Corporate ownership can provide access to substantial resources and cross-promotional opportunities

Private ownership

• Media outlets owned by individuals, families, or private investment groups (Cox Enterprises, Hearst Communications)
• Private owners may have more flexibility to pursue long-term strategies and invest in quality journalism without the pressure of quarterly earnings reports
• However, private owners' personal biases and interests can still influence editorial decisions
• Succession planning and the transfer of ownership across generations can be a challenge for privately-owned media companies

Public ownership

• Media outlets owned by government entities or funded through public sources (BBC, PBS)
• Public ownership can provide a mandate to serve the public interest and offer programming that may not be commercially viable
• However, public media may face political pressure and funding challenges, particularly in times of budget cuts or changes in government priorities
• Editorial independence from government influence is crucial for maintaining credibility and trust with audiences

Non-profit ownership

• Media outlets owned by non-profit organizations or funded through grants, donations, and memberships (ProPublica, The Texas Tribune)
• Non-profit ownership allows for a focus on public service journalism without the pressures of generating profits or satisfying shareholders
• However, non-profit media may face challenges in securing sustainable funding sources and building long-term organizational capacity
• Non-profit media outlets often rely on partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to extend their reach and impact

Trends in media ownership

Increasing concentration of ownership

• The number of companies controlling a majority of media outlets has decreased over time, leading to a more concentrated media landscape
• Mergers and acquisitions have allowed a handful of large corporations to dominate the media industry (Sinclair Broadcast Group, Nexstar Media Group)
• Concentration of ownership can limit the diversity of voices and perspectives in the media, as well as reduce competition and consumer choice

Mergers and acquisitions

• Media companies often seek to expand their market share and diversify their holdings through mergers and acquisitions
• Examples include the merger of Comcast and NBCUniversal, as well as the acquisition of Time Warner by AT&T (later spun off as WarnerMedia)
• Mergers and acquisitions can lead to layoffs, consolidation of resources, and changes in editorial priorities as companies seek to realize synergies and cost savings

Vertical vs horizontal integration

• Vertical integration refers to the ownership of multiple stages of the media supply chain, from content creation to distribution (Comcast owning both NBCUniversal and Xfinity cable services)
• Horizontal integration refers to the ownership of multiple outlets within the same stage of the supply chain (Sinclair Broadcast Group owning multiple local television stations)
• Both vertical and horizontal integration can increase a company's market power and ability to control the flow of information, potentially limiting competition and consumer choice

Effects of ownership on news content

Influence of corporate interests

• Corporate owners may prioritize stories and angles that align with their business interests or avoid coverage that could harm their other ventures
• For example, a media company owned by a conglomerate with investments in the energy sector may downplay or avoid reporting on environmental issues or climate change
• Corporate influence can lead to self-censorship among journalists and editors, who may feel pressure to avoid stories that could upset owners or advertisers

Editorial independence vs control

• Editorial independence refers to the ability of journalists and news organizations to make decisions about coverage without interference from owners or outside interests
• However, ownership consolidation and corporate influence can erode editorial independence, as owners may seek to control the tone and direction of news coverage
• Maintaining a clear separation between ownership and editorial decision-making is crucial for preserving the integrity and credibility of news organizations

Diversity of viewpoints and perspectives

• Concentration of media ownership can lead to a narrowing of viewpoints and perspectives represented in news coverage
• As fewer companies control more outlets, there is a risk that certain voices and communities may be marginalized or excluded from the media landscape
• Diverse ownership, including ownership by women and people of color, can help ensure that a wider range of experiences and perspectives are reflected in news coverage

Regulation of media ownership

FCC rules and regulations

• The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for regulating media ownership in the United States
• FCC rules have historically placed limits on the number of broadcast stations a single entity can own in a given market, as well as restrictions on cross-ownership of newspapers and broadcast outlets
• However, these rules have been relaxed over time, allowing for greater consolidation and cross-ownership in the media industry

Antitrust laws and enforcement

• Antitrust laws, such as the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act, are designed to promote competition and prevent monopolistic practices in various industries, including media
• The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are responsible for enforcing antitrust laws and reviewing proposed mergers and acquisitions for potential anti-competitive effects
• However, critics argue that antitrust enforcement has been insufficient in preventing the increasing concentration of media ownership

Debates over media ownership policies

• There are ongoing debates over the appropriate level of regulation and oversight of media ownership
• Proponents of deregulation argue that it allows for greater efficiency, innovation, and investment in the media industry
• Opponents of deregulation contend that it leads to a less diverse and competitive media landscape, with negative implications for democracy and the free exchange of ideas
• Policymakers must balance the competing interests of promoting competition and diversity while also allowing for the financial viability of media companies

Future of media consolidation and ownership

Potential for further consolidation

• Despite concerns over the negative effects of media consolidation, there is potential for further mergers and acquisitions in the industry
• The increasing importance of scale and the need to compete with digital platforms like Google and Facebook may drive additional consolidation
• However, regulatory scrutiny and public opposition to further concentration of media power may act as a check on future consolidation efforts

Challenges to traditional ownership models

• The rise of digital media and changing consumer habits pose challenges to traditional media ownership models
• Declining advertising revenues and the fragmentation of audiences across multiple platforms have put pressure on the financial viability of many media companies
• The success of subscription-based models (Netflix, The New York Times) and the growth of user-generated content (YouTube, TikTok) suggest that alternative ownership structures may become more prevalent in the future

Emergence of new ownership structures

• The media landscape is evolving, with the emergence of new ownership structures and business models
• Non-profit and community-owned media outlets are gaining traction as a way to promote local journalism and serve underrepresented communities
• Collaborative ownership models, such as employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) and consumer cooperatives, offer the potential for greater stakeholder involvement and accountability
• The rise of digital platforms and the decentralization of content creation may lead to more diverse and distributed forms of media ownership in the future