Engineering economics often involves making decisions in uncertain environments. This chapter explores methods for quantifying and managing uncertainty in engineering projects. From to Monte Carlo simulations, these tools help engineers make informed choices when faced with incomplete information.
Understanding risk-return trade-offs is crucial in engineering decision-making. This section delves into techniques for assessing and balancing potential risks against expected returns. By applying these concepts, engineers can optimize project outcomes and manage uncertainties effectively.
Uncertainty in Engineering Economics
Sources and Types of Uncertainty
Top images from around the web for Sources and Types of Uncertainty
Engineering Method – Electrical and Computer Engineering Design Handbook View original
Is this image relevant?
Uncertainty in risk engineering: concepts View original
Is this image relevant?
The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Engineering Method – Electrical and Computer Engineering Design Handbook View original
Is this image relevant?
Uncertainty in risk engineering: concepts View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Sources and Types of Uncertainty
Engineering Method – Electrical and Computer Engineering Design Handbook View original
Is this image relevant?
Uncertainty in risk engineering: concepts View original
Is this image relevant?
The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Engineering Method – Electrical and Computer Engineering Design Handbook View original
Is this image relevant?
Uncertainty in risk engineering: concepts View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Uncertainty in engineering economic decisions stems from incomplete information about future outcomes and their probabilities
Sources of uncertainty in engineering projects encompass market conditions, technological changes, regulatory environment, and project-specific risks
Two main types of uncertainty affect engineering decisions
Aleatory uncertainty arises from inherent randomness (weather patterns affecting construction timelines)
Epistemic uncertainty results from lack of knowledge (unknown geological conditions in a mining project)
Uncertainty significantly impacts engineering economic decisions by affecting project costs, revenues, and overall feasibility
Example: A new manufacturing plant's profitability depends on uncertain future demand for its products
Methods for Addressing Uncertainty
Sensitivity analysis examines how changes in input variables affect project outcomes
Example: Analyzing how different oil prices impact the profitability of an offshore drilling project
Scenario analysis evaluates project performance under different possible future states
Example: Assessing a renewable energy project under scenarios of high, medium, and low government subsidies
Probabilistic approaches incorporate probability distributions of uncertain variables
Example: Using to model the combined effect of uncertain material costs, labor productivity, and market demand on a construction project's budget
Quantifying Uncertainty
Probability and Statistical Concepts
Probability theory provides a framework for quantifying the likelihood of uncertain events in engineering economic analysis
Key probability concepts include:
Sample space represents all possible outcomes of an uncertain event
Events are subsets of the sample space
Probability distributions describe the likelihood of different outcomes (discrete or continuous)
Statistical methods analyze uncertain data in engineering economics:
Descriptive statistics summarize and describe data characteristics
Inferential statistics draw conclusions about populations based on sample data
Hypothesis testing assesses the validity of claims about population parameters
Measures characterize uncertain variables in engineering economic analysis:
Central tendency measures include mean (average value), median (middle value), and mode (most frequent value)
Dispersion measures include variance (average squared deviation from the mean) and standard deviation (square root of variance)
Advanced Techniques for Uncertainty Analysis
Monte Carlo simulation models complex systems with multiple uncertain variables
Example: Simulating project completion time by considering uncertainties in task durations, resource availability, and potential risks
updates probabilities as new information becomes available
Example: Refining cost estimates for a novel technology project as prototype testing provides more data
Value at Risk (VaR) quantifies the potential loss in value of an investment over a specific time period
Example: Calculating the maximum expected loss on a portfolio of engineering projects with 95% confidence over a one-year horizon
Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Decision Tree Analysis
graphically represent the sequence of decisions and chance events in a decision-making process under uncertainty
Components of a decision tree include:
Decision nodes represent points where a choice must be made
Chance nodes represent uncertain outcomes
Branches show possible decisions or outcomes
Terminal nodes display final outcomes
(EV) calculation multiplies each possible outcome by its probability and sums these products
Example: Calculating the expected value of a new product launch by considering different market scenarios and their probabilities
Optimal decision path determination involves working backwards from terminal nodes, calculating the expected value at each chance node
Example: Choosing between expanding a manufacturing facility or outsourcing production based on expected values of each option
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
Sensitivity analysis applied to decision trees assesses the impact of changes in probabilities or outcome values on the optimal decision
Example: Evaluating how changes in the probability of technical success affect the decision to invest in a new R&D project
Real Options Analysis, an extension of decision tree analysis, values flexibility in engineering projects under uncertainty
Example: Valuing the option to abandon a mining project if mineral prices fall below a certain threshold
incorporates decision-makers' risk attitudes (risk-averse, risk-neutral, risk-seeking) into the analysis
Example: Using exponential utility functions to model a company's in evaluating different investment opportunities
Risk vs Return Trade-offs
Quantifying Risk and Return
Risk in engineering economics represents the potential for negative outcomes or variations from expected results
Return signifies the potential benefits or profits from an engineering project or investment
The risk-return trade-off principle states that higher potential returns generally accompany higher levels of risk
Methods for quantifying risk include:
Variance measures the spread of possible outcomes around the expected value
Standard deviation provides a measure of risk in the same units as the original data
Coefficient of variation allows comparison of risk across investments with different expected returns
Value at Risk (VaR) estimates the maximum potential loss over a specified time period and confidence level
Risk Management Strategies
Risk attitudes influence decision-making and can be incorporated into analysis through utility theory
Example: A risk-averse company may choose a project with lower but more certain returns over a high-risk, high-return alternative
Portfolio theory and diversification strategies manage risk in engineering economic decisions involving multiple projects or investments
Example: Balancing a portfolio of energy projects across different technologies and geographical regions to reduce overall risk
Risk mitigation strategies in engineering projects include:
Insurance protects against specific risks (property damage, liability)
Contingency planning develops response strategies for potential risks
Risk transfer through contracts shifts certain risks to other parties (contractors, suppliers)
Example: Using fixed-price contracts to transfer cost overrun risks to contractors in a large infrastructure project