12.1 Developing monitoring and evaluation frameworks

Monitoring and evaluation frameworks are essential tools for nonprofit organizations to assess their impact and effectiveness. These frameworks help organizations track progress, identify areas for improvement, and demonstrate results to stakeholders and funders.

Key components include logic models, theories of change, SMART objectives, and M&E plans. Organizations also use different types of evaluations and collect baseline data and KPIs to measure their performance and impact over time.

Planning Frameworks

Logic Models and Theory of Change

Top images from around the web for Logic Models and Theory of Change

• 

  Planning, monitoring and evaluation - supporting constructive change and social learning View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Learning and Evaluation/Logic models/arz - Meta View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What Are Intended Impact and Theory of Change and How Can Nonprofits Use Them? | Bridgespan View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Planning, monitoring and evaluation - supporting constructive change and social learning View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Learning and Evaluation/Logic models/arz - Meta View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Logic Models and Theory of Change

• 

  Planning, monitoring and evaluation - supporting constructive change and social learning View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Learning and Evaluation/Logic models/arz - Meta View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What Are Intended Impact and Theory of Change and How Can Nonprofits Use Them? | Bridgespan View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Planning, monitoring and evaluation - supporting constructive change and social learning View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Learning and Evaluation/Logic models/arz - Meta View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Logic model visually represents program components and desired outcomes
  • Includes inputs, activities, outputs, and short/long-term outcomes
  • Helps identify causal relationships between program elements
• Theory of change articulates how and why a program will lead to intended results
  • Maps out the steps between activities and ultimate goals
  • Identifies assumptions and external factors influencing program success

SMART Objectives and M&E Plans

• SMART objectives guide program planning and evaluation
  • Specific: Clearly define what will be accomplished
  • Measurable: Include quantifiable indicators of progress
  • Achievable: Realistic given available resources and constraints
  • Relevant: Align with overall program goals and mission
  • Time-bound: Specify a timeframe for completion
• Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) plan outlines strategy for assessing program performance
  • Defines data collection methods, frequency, and responsible parties
  • Establishes reporting mechanisms and feedback loops
  • Incorporates both quantitative and qualitative measures

Evaluation Types

Formative and Summative Evaluation

• Formative evaluation assesses program implementation and processes
  • Conducted during program operation to identify areas for improvement
  • Involves ongoing feedback and adjustments (staff surveys, focus groups)
• Summative evaluation measures overall program impact and effectiveness
  • Conducted at program conclusion or major milestones
  • Determines if objectives were met and outcomes achieved (final reports, impact assessments)

Baseline Data and Key Performance Indicators

• Baseline data establishes initial conditions before program implementation
  • Serves as a reference point for measuring change over time
  • Collected through surveys, interviews, or existing data sources (census data, health records)
• Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) measure progress towards program objectives
  • Quantifiable metrics aligned with program goals and outcomes
  • Can include both output indicators (number of training sessions conducted) and outcome indicators (increase in participant knowledge)
  • Regular monitoring of KPIs allows for timely interventions and course corrections