is crucial in public speaking. It's about influencing others honestly and respectfully, prioritizing the audience's well-being. This approach builds and , setting it apart from manipulative tactics.
Understanding is key to maintaining . Common errors like attacks or arguments can undermine a speaker's credibility. Recognizing these pitfalls helps create more compelling and ethical persuasive speeches.
Ethical Persuasion and Fallacies
Foundations of Ethical Persuasion
Top images from around the web for Foundations of Ethical Persuasion
Communicating Ethically | Communication for Professionals View original
Is this image relevant?
Unit 33: Informative and Persuasive Presentations – Communication Skills View original
Is this image relevant?
Logos, Ethos, Pathos | Introduction to College Composition View original
Is this image relevant?
Communicating Ethically | Communication for Professionals View original
Is this image relevant?
Unit 33: Informative and Persuasive Presentations – Communication Skills View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Foundations of Ethical Persuasion
Communicating Ethically | Communication for Professionals View original
Is this image relevant?
Unit 33: Informative and Persuasive Presentations – Communication Skills View original
Is this image relevant?
Logos, Ethos, Pathos | Introduction to College Composition View original
Is this image relevant?
Communicating Ethically | Communication for Professionals View original
Is this image relevant?
Unit 33: Informative and Persuasive Presentations – Communication Skills View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Ethical persuasion influences others through honest, transparent, and respectful means
Prioritizes audience's well-being and autonomy
Crucial for maintaining trust, credibility, and long-term relationships with audiences
Respects audience's right to make informed decisions
Avoids or coercion
Aligns with and
Promotes in communication
Differs from propaganda (aims to manipulate or mislead)
Understanding Fallacious Arguments
Fallacious arguments constitute reasoning errors that can mislead audiences
Undermine speaker's credibility
Recognizing fallacies in one's own arguments and others' is crucial for logical integrity
Common types include:
Ad hominem (attacking the person instead of the argument)
Straw man (misrepresenting opponent's argument)
(presenting only two options when more exist)
(suggesting one event will lead to a chain of negative consequences without evidence)
(assuming something is true because it hasn't been proven false, or vice versa)
(incorrectly assuming one event caused another because it followed chronologically)
Principles of Persuasion
Reciprocity in Persuasive Communication
Social norm compelling people to return favors or gestures
Creates sense of obligation in the audience
Effective application involves offering valuable information or resources before making requests
Examples:
Providing free samples before asking for a purchase
Offering helpful advice before requesting a favor
Leveraging Social Proof
Psychological phenomenon where people look to others' actions to determine appropriate behavior
Effectively leveraged through:
Testimonials from satisfied customers or respected individuals
Statistics showing widespread adoption or approval
Case studies demonstrating successful implementation
Examples:
"9 out of 10 dentists recommend this toothpaste"
Showing before-and-after photos of weight loss program participants
Authority Principle in Persuasion
People more likely to comply with requests from perceived experts or legitimate authorities
Enhances persuasive power through:
Establishing credibility with qualifications and experience
Securing endorsements from respected figures
Demonstrating expertise in the subject matter
Examples:
Doctor recommending a specific medication
Celebrity athlete endorsing sports equipment
Balancing Persuasion Principles
Requires careful consideration of:
Audience
Ethical boundaries
Strategic use significantly enhances speech persuasiveness when applied ethically
Combining principles creates a more robust persuasive argument
Emotional Appeals in Communication
Understanding Pathos in Persuasion
engages audience's feelings and values to influence attitudes and behaviors
One of Aristotle's modes of persuasion
Focuses on evoking emotions to support speaker's argument
Effective utilize:
Storytelling to create personal connections
Vivid imagery to evoke strong feelings
Relatable examples to resonate with audience experiences
Responsible Use of Emotional Appeals
Involves authenticity and relevance to the topic
Respects audience's emotional well-being
Balances emotional appeals with logical arguments and credible evidence
Avoids manipulation, fear-mongering, or exploiting vulnerable emotions
Considers potential consequences on different audience segments
Examples:
Using personal anecdotes to illustrate the impact of a policy
Sharing heartwarming success stories in fundraising campaigns
Enhancing Persuasive Impact
Combines emotional appeals with (logic) and (credibility)
Creates a well-rounded and compelling argument
Strengthens overall persuasive impact of the speech
Examples:
Pairing emotional stories with statistical data
Combining expert testimony with relatable personal experiences
Logical Fallacies in Arguments
Common Logical Fallacies
Ad hominem: Attacks the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself
Example: "You can't trust his economic policy because he's never run a business"
Straw man: Misrepresents or oversimplifies an opponent's argument to make it easier to refute
Example: "Those who support gun control want to abolish the Second Amendment entirely"
False dichotomy: Presents only two options when more alternatives exist
Example: "Either we cut all social programs or we'll go bankrupt as a nation"
Slippery slope: Suggests one event will inevitably lead to a chain of negative consequences without sufficient evidence
Example: "If we legalize marijuana, soon all drugs will be legal, and society will collapse"
Additional Fallacies to Avoid
Appeal to ignorance: Assumes something is true because it hasn't been proven false, or vice versa
Example: "No one has proven ghosts don't exist, so they must be real"
Post hoc ergo propter hoc: Incorrectly assumes that because one event followed another, the first event caused the second
Example: "I wore my lucky socks and we won the game, so my socks must have caused our victory"
Bandwagon fallacy: Argues that something is true or right because it's popular
Example: "Everyone is buying this product, so it must be the best"
Appeal to nature: Assumes that because something is natural, it must be good or correct
Example: "Herbal supplements are better than pharmaceuticals because they're natural"