and are crucial tools in experimental design. They allow researchers to draw conclusions about populations based on sample data. These methods help determine if observed effects are statistically significant or simply due to chance.
Hypothesis testing involves formulating null and alternative hypotheses, setting significance levels, and calculating p-values. Understanding Type I and Type II errors, as well as , is essential for interpreting results accurately and drawing valid conclusions from experiments.
Hypothesis Testing
Formulating Hypotheses
Top images from around the web for Formulating Hypotheses
Hypothesis Testing (3 of 5) | Concepts in Statistics View original
Is this image relevant?
Comparing two means – Learning Statistics with R View original
Hypothesis Testing (3 of 5) | Concepts in Statistics View original
Is this image relevant?
Comparing two means – Learning Statistics with R View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
(H0) represents the default position or the assumption that there is no significant effect or difference
(Ha or H1) represents the claim that contradicts the null hypothesis and suggests a significant effect or difference exists
(α) is the probability threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis, commonly set at 0.05 (5%) or 0.01 (1%)
examines the alternative hypothesis in only one direction (greater than or less than the null hypothesis value)
considers the alternative hypothesis in both directions (not equal to the null hypothesis value)
Evaluating Hypotheses
represents the probability of obtaining the observed results or more extreme results, assuming the null hypothesis is true
If the p-value is less than the chosen significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis
If the p-value is greater than the significance level, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis
provides a range of values within which the true population parameter is likely to fall, based on the sample data and the chosen (e.g., 95% confidence interval)
Types of Errors
Type I and Type II Errors
(false positive) occurs when the null hypothesis is rejected even though it is actually true
The significance level (α) represents the probability of making a Type I error
Example: Concluding a drug is effective when it actually has no effect
(false negative) occurs when the null hypothesis is not rejected even though it is actually false
The probability of a Type II error is denoted by β
Example: Failing to detect a real difference between two treatment groups
Statistical Power
Statistical power is the probability of correctly rejecting a false null hypothesis (i.e., detecting a true effect when it exists)
Power is calculated as 1−β, where β is the probability of a Type II error
Factors that influence power include sample size, , significance level, and the type of test used
Increasing sample size, using a larger significance level, or focusing on larger effect sizes can increase statistical power
Test Statistics
Calculating Test Statistics
is a value calculated from the sample data that is used to make a decision about the null hypothesis
The choice of test statistic depends on the type of data and the research question (e.g., t-statistic, z-statistic, F-statistic)
Example: t-statistic is used to compare the means of two groups or to test the significance of a regression coefficient
(df) represent the number of independent pieces of information used to calculate the test statistic
Degrees of freedom are determined by the sample size and the number of parameters being estimated
Example: In a two-sample t-test, df = (n1+n2−2), where n1 and n2 are the sample sizes of the two groups
Interpreting Test Statistics
The test statistic is compared to a critical value determined by the degrees of freedom and the chosen significance level
If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected
If the test statistic does not exceed the critical value, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis
The p-value associated with the test statistic indicates the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the one calculated, assuming the null hypothesis is true