13.1 Conceptual Foundations of Environmental Justice
7 min read•july 30, 2024
is all about fairness in how we deal with environmental issues. It's about making sure everyone, no matter their background or income, has a say in decisions that affect their surroundings and health.
This topic digs into the core ideas behind environmental justice. It looks at how some communities face more environmental risks than others and explores ways to balance the scales. It's a key part of understanding how environmental issues and social equality are connected.
Environmental justice and its principles
Definition and key principles
Top images from around the web for Definition and key principles
Frontiers | Situating the Scientist: Creating Inclusive Science Communication Through Equity ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Environmental justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of race, color, national origin, or income, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies
Aims to address the disproportionate environmental harms and risks borne by marginalized communities (low-income communities, communities of color)
Equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens across all communities is a key principle
Ensures that no community bears an undue share of environmental hazards (polluting industries, hazardous waste facilities)
Promotes equal access to environmental benefits (clean air, water, green spaces)
Meaningful participation and self-determination of affected communities in environmental decision-making processes is essential
Empowers communities to have a voice in decisions that impact their environment and health
Recognizes the local knowledge and expertise of affected communities
Recognition and respect for the cultural and ecological diversity of communities is crucial
Acknowledges the unique relationships that communities have with their environment
Protects the cultural practices and livelihoods that depend on healthy ecosystems
The right to a safe, healthy, and sustainable environment for all individuals and communities is a fundamental principle
Emphasizes the importance of environmental quality as a basic human right
Calls for the protection of vulnerable populations from environmental hazards (children, elderly, low-income communities)
Advocacy and protection
Environmental justice advocates for the protection of vulnerable populations from environmental hazards
Campaigns against the disproportionate siting of polluting industries and hazardous waste facilities in marginalized communities
Supports community-led efforts to monitor and address environmental contamination
Promotes equal access to environmental benefits and resources
Advocates for the equitable distribution of green spaces, public transportation, and clean energy infrastructure
Works to ensure that marginalized communities have access to healthy food, clean water, and other environmental necessities
Builds coalitions and partnerships to advance environmental justice goals
Collaborates with social justice organizations, labor unions, and other allies to address intersecting forms of inequality
Engages in policy advocacy and legal action to promote environmental justice at the local, state, and federal levels
History of the environmental justice movement
Origins and early struggles
The environmental justice movement emerged in the United States during the 1970s and 1980s
Communities of color and low-income communities began to organize against the disproportionate siting of polluting industries and hazardous waste facilities in their neighborhoods
Recognized the unequal distribution of and the need for community-led resistance
Early environmental justice struggles brought national attention to the issue of
Warren County PCB Landfill protest in North Carolina (1982) opposed the siting of a hazardous waste landfill in a predominantly African American community
Love Canal disaster in New York (1978) revealed the health impacts of industrial pollution on a low-income community
These early struggles highlighted the intersection of environmental degradation and social inequality
Demonstrated how race, class, and political power shape the distribution of environmental hazards
Challenged the mainstream environmental movement's focus on wilderness preservation and conservation, which often overlooked the concerns of marginalized communities
Expansion and policy achievements
The First National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit (1991) was a significant milestone in the development of the environmental justice movement
Brought together activists from across the country to share experiences and develop a common agenda
Issued the Principles of Environmental Justice, which outlined the movement's key goals and values
The environmental justice movement has since expanded its focus to include a wide range of issues
Climate justice recognizes the disproportionate impacts of climate change on marginalized communities and advocates for equitable solutions
Food justice seeks to ensure equal access to healthy, affordable, and culturally appropriate food
Transportation justice advocates for accessible, affordable, and sustainable transportation options for all communities
Green jobs initiatives aim to create employment opportunities in the clean energy sector, particularly for marginalized communities
In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed Executive Order 12898, which directed federal agencies to address environmental justice concerns in their policies and programs
Marked a significant policy achievement for the environmental justice movement
Required federal agencies to identify and address disproportionate environmental impacts on marginalized communities
Established an Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice to coordinate federal efforts
Environmental degradation vs social inequality
Disproportionate burdens and limited access
Marginalized communities often bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and have limited access to environmental benefits
Low-income communities and communities of color are more likely to be located near polluting industries (refineries, factories), hazardous waste sites, and other sources of environmental contamination
Proximity to environmental hazards leads to higher rates of exposure to toxins and associated health risks (respiratory illnesses, cancer, developmental disorders)
Limited access to clean air, water, and green spaces can negatively impact health and well-being
Social inequality can exacerbate the impacts of environmental degradation
Marginalized communities often have fewer resources (financial, political) to advocate for environmental protections and remediation
Lack of political clout can make it difficult for affected communities to influence environmental decision-making processes
Limited access to healthcare and other social services can compound the health impacts of environmental exposures
Perpetuation of inequality
Environmental degradation can perpetuate social inequality by disproportionately impacting the livelihoods and cultural practices of marginalized communities
Contamination of water sources can harm communities that rely on fishing or agriculture for subsistence
Destruction of ecosystems can disrupt traditional cultural practices and spiritual connections to the land
Displacement of communities due to environmental hazards or development projects can lead to loss of social networks and cultural heritage
The unequal distribution of environmental benefits can reinforce existing social inequalities
Lack of access to green spaces and recreational opportunities can limit opportunities for physical activity and social interaction
Unequal access to clean energy and energy-efficient housing can lead to higher energy burdens for low-income households
Limited transportation options can restrict access to employment, education, and healthcare services
Challenges to environmental justice
Power imbalances and limited resources
Entrenched power imbalances between marginalized communities and the corporations and government agencies responsible for environmental decision-making pose a significant challenge
Corporations often have greater financial resources and political influence than affected communities
Government agencies may prioritize economic development over environmental protection and community well-being
Limited access to information, resources, and legal representation can hinder the ability of affected communities to effectively participate in environmental decision-making processes and advocate for their rights
Technical language and complex regulatory processes can be barriers to meaningful participation
Lack of financial resources can limit access to legal and scientific expertise needed to challenge environmental decisions
The lack of diverse representation in environmental organizations and government agencies can lead to a failure to prioritize and address the concerns of marginalized communities
Predominantly white, middle-class composition of many environmental organizations can result in a narrow focus on conservation and preservation issues
Underrepresentation of marginalized communities in government agencies can lead to policies that overlook or exacerbate environmental injustices
Complexity and intersectionality
The complex and often slow-moving nature of environmental policymaking and regulation can make it difficult to address environmental justice concerns in a timely and effective manner
Environmental impact assessments and permitting processes can take years to complete
Enforcement of environmental regulations can be inconsistent or inadequate
The intersection of multiple forms of inequality (race, class, gender) can create compounding barriers to achieving environmental justice
Women of color, for example, may face unique challenges in advocating for environmental justice due to the combined effects of racism, sexism, and economic marginalization
Addressing environmental injustices requires a holistic approach that recognizes the interconnectedness of social, economic, and environmental inequalities
The global nature of many environmental problems (climate change, deforestation) can make it challenging to address environmental justice concerns at the local level
Global economic forces and political decisions can have disproportionate impacts on marginalized communities
International cooperation and solidarity among environmental justice movements is necessary to address transboundary environmental issues
Resistance from industries and political actors with vested interests in maintaining the status quo can hinder efforts to promote environmental justice through policy and regulatory changes
Fossil fuel companies, for example, may oppose efforts to transition to clean energy sources that would benefit marginalized communities
Political leaders may prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term environmental sustainability and social equity