13.2 The critique of rhetoric and sophistry in politics

Plato's critique of rhetoric and sophistry in politics is a key aspect of his political philosophy. He argues that these practices prioritize persuasion over truth, potentially corrupting democratic systems by allowing skilled orators to manipulate public opinion regardless of the merit of their ideas.

Plato proposes philosophical discourse as an alternative, emphasizing the pursuit of absolute truths through critical thinking and logical analysis. This approach, he believes, leads to more just and well-reasoned political decisions, countering the vulnerability of democracy to charismatic but unwise leaders.

Plato's Critique of Rhetoric

Rhetoric as Flattery and Manipulation

Top images from around the web for Rhetoric as Flattery and Manipulation

• 

  Rhetoric in the Ancient World | Public Speaking View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  7.2: Rhetoric In Ancient Times - Social Sci LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  So Jesus read Plato? – Vridar View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rhetoric in the Ancient World | Public Speaking View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  7.2: Rhetoric In Ancient Times - Social Sci LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Rhetoric as Flattery and Manipulation

• 

  Rhetoric in the Ancient World | Public Speaking View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  7.2: Rhetoric In Ancient Times - Social Sci LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  So Jesus read Plato? – Vridar View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rhetoric in the Ancient World | Public Speaking View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  7.2: Rhetoric In Ancient Times - Social Sci LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Plato articulates critique of rhetoric and sophistry in dialogues "Gorgias" and "Phaedrus"
• Argues rhetoric functions as flattery (kolakeia) aimed at pleasing audiences rather than pursuing truth
• Contends sophistry focuses on winning arguments and gaining power instead of seeking genuine knowledge
• Views rhetoric without philosophical grounding leads to manipulation of masses and corruption of political systems
• Criticizes sophists for teaching persuasion without moral or ethical considerations
• Believes this approach potentially results in unjust outcomes in political decision-making (unfair laws, biased policies)

Vulnerability of Democracy to Rhetoric

• Extends criticism to democratic system itself
• Argues democracy vulnerable to exploitation by skilled orators lacking wisdom or virtue
• Contends charismatic speakers can sway public opinion regardless of the merit of their ideas
• Believes this vulnerability can lead to election of unqualified but persuasive leaders
• Warns of potential for demagogues to rise to power through manipulation of public sentiment

Philosophical Discourse as Alternative

• Proposes true political discourse should be grounded in philosophical inquiry
• Advocates for pursuit of absolute truths rather than relative or subjective opinions
• Believes philosophical approach leads to more just and well-reasoned political decisions
• Argues for importance of critical thinking and logical analysis in political discourse
• Suggests philosophical grounding can help resist emotional manipulation in politics

Philosophical Discourse vs Rhetoric

Characteristics of Genuine Philosophical Discourse

• Employs dialectical approach to uncover truth through reasoned argument
• Involves critical examination of ideas and assumptions
• Aims at pursuit of knowledge and understanding rather than personal gain
• Requires commitment to intellectual honesty and following arguments to logical conclusions
• Prioritizes improvement of the soul and pursuit of virtue
• Encourages questioning of one's own beliefs and openness to new ideas
• Utilizes Socratic method of systematic questioning to expose limitations in arguments

Manipulative Rhetoric Techniques

• Relies on emotional appeals to sway audiences (fear-mongering, patriotic fervor)
• Employs logical fallacies to create persuasive but unsound arguments (ad hominem attacks, false dichotomies)
• Uses persuasive techniques designed to influence regardless of truth (repetition, loaded language)
• Often serves speaker's personal or political interests rather than pursuit of truth
• Prioritizes short-term gains or personal advantages over long-term societal benefits
• May use ad hominem attacks to discredit opponents rather than addressing their arguments
• Employs loaded language to trigger emotional responses (freedom fighters vs terrorists)

Plato's View on Discourse in Society

• Argues distinction between philosophical discourse and manipulative rhetoric crucial for just society
• Believes genuine philosophical inquiry necessary for achieving well-ordered political system
• Contends philosophical discourse leads to better-informed citizenry and more competent leadership
• Warns against dangers of prioritizing persuasive skill over wisdom in political decision-making
• Advocates for education system that emphasizes critical thinking and philosophical reasoning

Sophistry's Impact on Democracy

Distortion of Political Leadership

• Prioritizes persuasive skill over wisdom and virtue in leadership selection
• Can result in election of charismatic but unqualified individuals to positions of power
• Potentially leads to leadership focused on maintaining popularity rather than making difficult but necessary decisions
• May create a political culture that values style over substance in public discourse

Short-term Focus and Polarization

• Prevalence of sophistry can shift focus to short-term popular opinion rather than long-term societal benefits
• Skilled orators can sway public sentiment on complex issues without providing comprehensive solutions
• Contributes to polarization of political debates by emphasizing winning arguments over seeking common ground
• Can undermine cooperative nature of democratic governance by promoting adversarial communication styles

Degradation of Civic Discourse

• Creates uneven playing field in political discourse, disadvantaging those lacking oratorical training
• May sideline genuine experts whose ideas are not presented in a persuasive manner
• Leads to devaluation of truth and justice in political decision-making
• Results in focus on what can be successfully argued rather than what is objectively right or beneficial
• Can create a cycle of increasingly manipulative political communication as politicians compete in persuasive techniques
• Potentially degrades civic virtue and pursuit of common good as citizens become more susceptible to manipulation
• May lead to decreased engagement in critical thinking among the general population

Philosophical Reasoning vs Rhetorical Persuasion

Objectives and Methods

• Philosophical reasoning aims to discover absolute truths and universal principles
• Rhetorical persuasion often deals with opinions and relative truths that can change based on audience
• Philosophical inquiry cultivates critical thinking skills and intellectual humility
• Encourages questioning of one's own beliefs and seeking deeper understanding
• Rhetorical persuasion may prioritize winning arguments over pursuing truth

Foundations and Outcomes

• Philosophical reasoning grounded in logic and systematic analysis
• Provides more reliable foundation for decision-making than emotional appeals
• Promotes development of virtue and wisdom in individuals and society
• Rhetorical persuasion may prioritize personal gain or power over collective good
• Philosophical approach essential for addressing complex, long-term challenges
• Necessary for creating truly just and harmonious society according to Plato

Application in Governance

• Plato argues philosophical reasoning essential for good governance
• Enables leaders to make decisions based on comprehensive understanding of justice and common good
• Contrasts with decisions based solely on popular opinion or personal interest
• Socratic method demonstrates superiority of philosophical reasoning by exposing limitations in rhetorical arguments
• Philosophical approach better equipped to address nuanced policy issues (environmental regulations, economic reforms)
• Promotes long-term planning and consideration of diverse perspectives in governance