13.2 Environmental externalities and agricultural production

Agricultural production generates both positive and negative environmental externalities. These impacts, like water pollution and carbon sequestration, affect third parties and the environment. Understanding these externalities is crucial for sustainable resource management.

Economic analysis reveals how externalities lead to market inefficiencies. Policy approaches, such as Pigouvian taxes and cap-and-trade systems, aim to internalize these costs and benefits. Valuing agricultural externalities presents challenges in measurement, attribution, and nonmarket valuation.

Environmental Externalities in Agriculture

Types of Externalities

Top images from around the web for Types of Externalities

• 

  Frontiers | Climate Change and Salinity Effects on Crops and Chemical Communication Between ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Research Road Map for Responsible Use of Agricultural Nitrogen | Sustainable Food ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Source: Arvis et al. (2020). View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Climate Change and Salinity Effects on Crops and Chemical Communication Between ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Research Road Map for Responsible Use of Agricultural Nitrogen | Sustainable Food ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Types of Externalities

• 

  Frontiers | Climate Change and Salinity Effects on Crops and Chemical Communication Between ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Research Road Map for Responsible Use of Agricultural Nitrogen | Sustainable Food ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Source: Arvis et al. (2020). View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Climate Change and Salinity Effects on Crops and Chemical Communication Between ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Research Road Map for Responsible Use of Agricultural Nitrogen | Sustainable Food ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Agricultural production generates both positive and negative environmental externalities
  • Positive externalities provide benefits to third parties (carbon sequestration, groundwater recharge)
  • Negative externalities impose costs on others not directly involved in the production process (water pollution, air pollution)
• Major negative externalities from agriculture:
  • Water pollution from nutrient runoff (nitrogen, phosphorus)
    • Excessive nutrient runoff from fertilizer application leads to eutrophication and hypoxic "dead zones" in water bodies (Gulf of Mexico)
  • Soil erosion and sedimentation
    • Soil erosion reduces future land productivity and causes sedimentation in waterways, impacting aquatic habitats (reduced fish populations)
  • Air pollution from livestock operations
    • Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) emit ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and particulate matter, affecting local air quality (respiratory issues in nearby communities)
  • Loss of biodiversity
    • Conversion of natural habitats to cropland and excessive pesticide use contribute to biodiversity loss (decline in pollinator populations)

Positive Externalities

• Positive externalities from agriculture encompass ecosystem services:
  • Carbon sequestration in soils
    • Agricultural practices like no-till farming and cover cropping can increase soil organic carbon, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions (climate change mitigation)
  • Groundwater recharge
    • Certain agricultural landscapes, such as wetlands and riparian buffers, facilitate groundwater recharge, replenishing aquifers (improved water security)
  • Preservation of rural landscapes and open space
    • Agricultural lands provide scenic amenities and recreational opportunities, contributing to rural tourism and quality of life (agritourism, hunting, fishing)

Economic Analysis of Agricultural Externalities

Causes and Consequences

• Environmental externalities arise when the actions of agricultural producers have unintended and uncompensated impacts on third parties or the environment
  • Occur due to incomplete property rights and missing markets for environmental goods and services (lack of prices for clean air, water)
• Private marginal cost (PMC) of agricultural production only includes direct costs borne by the producer
  • In the presence of negative externalities, social marginal cost (SMC) exceeds PMC, as it incorporates additional external costs imposed on society
• When producers only consider PMC and ignore external costs, they tend to overproduce the good generating the negative externality compared to the socially optimal level
  • Leads to deadweight loss and inefficient allocation of resources (overuse of fertilizers, pesticides)
• Positive externalities from agriculture lead to underprovision of the beneficial activity, as producers do not fully capture the social benefits
  • Social marginal benefit (SMB) exceeds private marginal benefit (PMB) (underprovision of ecosystem services)

Coase Theorem and Transaction Costs

• Coase Theorem suggests that in the absence of transaction costs, private bargaining between affected parties can lead to an efficient outcome, regardless of the initial allocation of property rights
  • Example: if a downstream water user has the right to clean water, they could pay an upstream farmer to reduce nutrient runoff
• However, high transaction costs often preclude such solutions for environmental externalities
  • Large number of affected parties, information asymmetries, and free-rider problems make private bargaining infeasible (diffuse pollution from multiple agricultural sources)

Policy Approaches to Internalizing Externalities

Pigouvian Taxes and Subsidies

• Pigouvian taxes can be imposed on activities generating negative externalities
  • Tax on fertilizer or pesticide use
    • Optimal tax rate equals marginal external cost at the socially efficient level of output, forcing producers to internalize the externality
  • Pigouvian taxes are efficient as they incentivize producers to reduce the externality-generating activity to the socially optimal level
    • However, they place the cost burden on producers and may have regressive distributional effects (small farmers disproportionately affected)
• Subsidies can be provided for activities generating positive externalities
  • Payments for ecosystem services or conservation practices (USDA Conservation Reserve Program)
    • Optimal subsidy rate equals marginal external benefit at the socially efficient level of provision
  • Subsidies encourage the provision of positive externalities but involve a transfer from taxpayers to producers
    • May lead to inefficiencies if not properly targeted or calibrated (overcompensation, lack of additionality)

Command-and-Control Regulations and Market-Based Instruments

• Command-and-control regulations, such as technology standards or emission limits, can directly mandate the abatement of negative externalities
  • Nutrient management plans, buffer strip requirements
    • Effective in achieving specific environmental targets but may not be cost-efficient and provide little flexibility to heterogeneous producers
• Cap-and-trade systems establish a total limit on the externality-generating activity and allocate tradable permits among producers
  • Creates a market for the right to generate the externality, leading to an efficient allocation of abatement efforts (least-cost abatement)
    • Cost-effective as it allows flexibility in achieving the overall emissions target
    • Initial allocation of permits has distributional implications, with grandfathering favoring incumbent producers and auctioning generating revenue for the regulator

Challenges in Valuing Agricultural Externalities

Measurement and Attribution

• Quantifying the physical magnitude of environmental externalities is complex due to the diffuse and often nonpoint nature of agricultural pollution
  • Tracing the fate and transport of pollutants from multiple sources to receptors is challenging (watershed-scale modeling)
• Establishing the causal link between agricultural practices and environmental impacts requires detailed data and sophisticated modeling approaches
  • Data and resource-intensive (field-level monitoring, remote sensing)

Nonmarket Valuation Techniques

• Valuing environmental externalities is complicated by the lack of market prices for many environmental goods and services
• Nonmarket valuation techniques, such as stated and revealed preference methods, are used to estimate the monetary value of these impacts
  • Stated preference methods, like contingent valuation and choice experiments, rely on surveys to elicit individuals' willingness to pay for environmental improvements or willingness to accept compensation for environmental degradation
    • Subject to hypothetical bias and strategic responses
  • Revealed preference methods, such as hedonic pricing and travel cost analysis, infer the value of environmental amenities from observed market transactions or behavior
    • Limited by omitted variable bias and the need for sufficient variation in environmental quality

Aggregation and Discounting

• Aggregating and comparing diverse environmental impacts, potentially occurring over different spatial and temporal scales, requires normalization and discounting
  • Choice of discount rate for future environmental costs and benefits is contentious (intergenerational equity concerns)
• Uncertainty surrounding the magnitude, valuation, and irreversibility of environmental impacts complicates the assessment and internalization of externalities in decision-making
  • Precautionary principle, safe minimum standards