13.2 The Second Incompleteness Theorem: Statement and Proof Outline

Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem reveals a fundamental limit in mathematics. It shows that no consistent formal system powerful enough for arithmetic can prove its own consistency within itself.

This theorem extends Gödel's First Incompleteness Theorem, challenging the foundations of mathematics. It exposes the limitations of formal systems and necessitates stronger systems to prove the consistency of weaker ones.

Understanding Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem

Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem

Top images from around the web for Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem

• 

  reference request - What was Hilbert's view of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems? - MathOverflow View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Gödel Incompleteness Theorem | From the book A Mathematical … | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Astronomist: Gödel's Proof View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  reference request - What was Hilbert's view of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems? - MathOverflow View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Gödel Incompleteness Theorem | From the book A Mathematical … | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem

• 

  reference request - What was Hilbert's view of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems? - MathOverflow View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Gödel Incompleteness Theorem | From the book A Mathematical … | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Astronomist: Gödel's Proof View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  reference request - What was Hilbert's view of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems? - MathOverflow View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Gödel Incompleteness Theorem | From the book A Mathematical … | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Formal statement asserts no consistent formal system powerful enough to encode arithmetic can prove its own consistency within itself (Peano arithmetic, Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory)
• Main implications reveal impossibility of proving consistency within a system, expose limitations of formal systems, necessitate stronger systems to prove consistency of weaker ones
• Developed by Kurt Gödel in 1931 extended his First Incompleteness Theorem challenged foundational mathematics

Proof steps of Second Incompleteness Theorem

• Formalization of provability introduces provability predicate encodes syntactic notions in arithmetic
• Application of Diagonal Lemma constructs sentence asserting its own unprovability
• Derivation of consistency statement expresses consistency as formal sentence in system
• Linking consistency to unprovability of Gödel sentence shows provability of consistency implies provability of Gödel sentence
• Conclusion by contradiction assumes provability of consistency leads to inconsistency

Implications and Significance

Implications for axiomatic systems

• Internal consistency proofs impossible systems cannot verify own reliability
• Sufficiently strong formal systems incomplete true but unprovable statements exist (Continuum Hypothesis)
• Hierarchy of formal systems requires stronger systems to prove consistency of weaker ones
• Philosophical implications highlight limitations of mathematical knowledge question nature of mathematical truth
• Impact on foundational mathematics challenged Hilbert's program shifted understanding of formal systems

Self-reference in theorem proof

• Self-reference in formal systems enables systems to discuss own properties
• Diagonal Lemma crucial for constructing self-referential sentences
• Gödel numbering encodes formulas and proofs as numbers
• Gödel sentence construction asserts its own unprovability
• Creates paradoxical situations similar to Liar Paradox
• Proof structure enables system to reason about own consistency