13.2 Forward and backward induction

Dynamic programming induction methods are powerful tools for solving complex optimization problems. Forward and backward induction offer different approaches, each with unique strengths and applications in various fields.

These methods leverage the principle of optimality to break down problems into smaller subproblems. By understanding the nuances of each approach, we can choose the most efficient method for tackling specific optimization challenges.

Dynamic Programming Induction Methods

Forward vs backward induction

Top images from around the web for Forward vs backward induction

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Review of Stochastic Programming Methods for Optimization of Process Systems Under ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Problem Solving Methods Library – Radical Open Innovation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Review of Stochastic Programming Methods for Optimization of Process Systems Under ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Forward vs backward induction

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Review of Stochastic Programming Methods for Optimization of Process Systems Under ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Problem Solving Methods Library – Radical Open Innovation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Review of Stochastic Programming Methods for Optimization of Process Systems Under ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Forward induction starts at initial state moves forward in time solves subproblems chronologically builds solution combining optimal solutions of smaller subproblems (shortest path problem)
• Backward induction begins at final state moves backward in time solves subproblems in reverse chronological order determines optimal decisions working backwards from end (retirement planning)
• Key differences include direction of problem-solving order of subproblem resolution application suitability based on problem structure (inventory management vs option pricing)

Optimization with forward induction

• Forward induction steps:
  1. Define stages and state variables
  2. Identify decision variables
  3. Formulate recursive equation
  4. Initialize base case
  5. Iterate forward through stages
• Bellman's principle of optimality states optimal solution contains optimal solutions to subproblems enables efficient problem-solving (knapsack problem)
• Tabulation method creates table to store optimal values for subproblems fills table bottom-up manner improves efficiency (fibonacci sequence calculation)
• Memoization technique stores results of expensive function calls returns cached result when same inputs occur reduces redundant computations (recursive matrix chain multiplication)

Backward induction for optimal solutions

• Backward induction procedure:
  1. Start at final stage
  2. Compute optimal decision for each possible state
  3. Move to previous stage and repeat
  4. Continue until reaching initial stage
• Value function represents maximum expected utility from given state guides decision-making process (asset allocation)
• Policy function defines optimal decision rule for each state provides actionable strategy (optimal stopping problem)
• Dynamic programming equation: $V_t(s_t) = \max_{a_t} \{R(s_t, a_t) + \gamma V_{t+1}(s_{t+1})\}$
  • $V_t(s_t)$: Value function at time $t$ and state $s_t$
  • $a_t$: Action taken at time $t$
  • $R(s_t, a_t)$: Reward function
  • $\gamma$: Discount factor
• Applications include finite horizon problems and stochastic dynamic programming (equipment replacement, portfolio optimization)

Efficiency of induction methods

• Time complexity typically $O(ST)$ where $S$ is number of states and $T$ is number of stages applies to both methods
• Space complexity varies forward induction $O(S)$ if only final solution needed backward induction $O(ST)$ to store all intermediate results
• Problem-specific considerations forward induction efficient for few initial states backward induction preferable for few terminal states (maze solving vs game theory)
• Parallelization potential forward induction limited due to dependencies backward induction more amenable to parallelization improves computational efficiency
• Adaptability to changing conditions forward induction easier to adapt to initial condition changes backward induction more flexible for terminal condition changes (production planning vs financial derivatives pricing)