14.1 The Compromise of 1850

The Compromise of 1850 aimed to ease tensions between free and slave states. It included California's admission as a free state, popular sovereignty in Utah and New Mexico, and the controversial Fugitive Slave Act. These measures had far-reaching consequences for the nation.

The compromise's impact was significant. The Fugitive Slave Act angered Northerners, boosting anti-slavery sentiment. Popular sovereignty led to violence in Kansas. These events deepened the divide between North and South, setting the stage for future conflicts.

The Compromise of 1850

Components of 1850 Compromise

Top images from around the web for Components of 1850 Compromise

• 

  Origins of the American Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Compromise of 1850 | US History I – Daniel Deluna, Santa Ana Community College View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Origins of the American Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Compromise of 1850 | US History I – Daniel Deluna, Santa Ana Community College View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Components of 1850 Compromise

• 

  Origins of the American Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Compromise of 1850 | US History I – Daniel Deluna, Santa Ana Community College View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Origins of the American Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Compromise of 1850 | US History I – Daniel Deluna, Santa Ana Community College View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Admission of California as a free state upset the balance between free and slave states, causing Southerners to fear losing power in the Senate
• Organization of Utah and New Mexico territories allowed them to decide the slavery issue through popular sovereignty, delaying the decision on slavery in these territories (Kansas-Nebraska Act)
• Abolition of the slave trade in Washington, D.C. served as a symbolic victory for abolitionists but did not affect slavery in the nation's capital
• Fugitive Slave Act required Northerners to assist in capturing escaped slaves, increasing resentment among Northerners toward slavery (Underground Railroad)
• Texas-New Mexico border dispute resolution had Texas give up territorial claims in exchange for debt relief, preventing potential armed conflict between Texas and the federal government

Impact of Fugitive Slave Act

• Required Northerners to actively participate in capturing escaped slaves, which many found morally reprehensible and resented being forced to support a system they opposed
• Denied alleged fugitive slaves the right to a jury trial, preventing accused individuals from defending themselves adequately and violating principles of due process and fairness
• Increased the power of slave catchers and federal commissioners, encouraging abuse and kidnapping of free African Americans and heightening fears of Southern influence on the federal government
• Led to organized resistance in the North, with increased Underground Railroad activity and the passage of Personal Liberty Laws to counteract the Fugitive Slave Act
• Shifted Northern public opinion against slavery, causing many previously indifferent Northerners to become more opposed to slavery and contributing to the growth of the Republican Party (Abraham Lincoln)

Popular sovereignty in slavery debate

• Concept of allowing territorial residents to decide the slavery issue proposed as a compromise to avoid direct Congressional decision and intended to reduce sectional tensions over slavery's expansion
• Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 organized Kansas and Nebraska territories using popular sovereignty, repealing the Missouri Compromise's prohibition of slavery north of 36°30' latitude
• Led to "Bleeding Kansas" violence, with pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers clashing in Kansas Territory, highlighting the failure of popular sovereignty to resolve the issue peacefully
• Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) Supreme Court ruling that Congress could not ban slavery in the territories undermined the concept of popular sovereignty
• Lincoln-Douglas Debates (1858) focused on the morality and legality of popular sovereignty, helping propel Abraham Lincoln to national prominence
• Divided the Democratic Party, with Northern Democrats favoring popular sovereignty and Southern Democrats demanding federal protection for slavery in the territories

Historical Context and Political Landscape

• The Missouri Compromise of 1820 had previously established a line dividing free and slave territories, which was challenged by the Compromise of 1850
• The concept of Manifest Destiny fueled westward expansion, intensifying debates over the spread of slavery into new territories
• The Wilmot Proviso, proposed in 1846, attempted to ban slavery in territories acquired from Mexico, increasing sectional tensions
• The Whig Party and Democratic Party were the major political forces of the time, with both struggling to maintain national unity over the slavery issue
• Some Southern states threatened nullification of federal laws they deemed unconstitutional, further straining relations between the North and South