14.1 Theories and Models of Migration in Archaeology

Migration shaped ancient societies, driving cultural change and innovation. Archaeologists use models like push-pull and wave of advance to understand why people moved and how it affected cultures. These frameworks help interpret evidence of past migrations.

Challenges arise in distinguishing migration from trade or cultural diffusion. Scientists use multiple methods like isotope analysis and ancient DNA to piece together migration stories. Understanding these movements reveals how societies evolved and interacted.

Theories and Models of Migration

Push-pull model of migration

Top images from around the web for Push-pull model of migration

• 

  Language and migration – Language on the Move View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction – Modern World History View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Homo sapiens - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Language and migration – Language on the Move View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction – Modern World History View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Push-pull model of migration

• 

  Language and migration – Language on the Move View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction – Modern World History View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Homo sapiens - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Language and migration – Language on the Move View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction – Modern World History View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Explains migration as a result of factors that encourage people to leave their place of origin (push factors) and factors that attract them to a new location (pull factors)
  • Push factors drive people to migrate away from their current location due to negative circumstances such as environmental stress (droughts), resource depletion (overfishing), population pressure (overcrowding), or social or political unrest (wars)
  • Pull factors attract people to migrate to a new location due to positive circumstances such as better resources (fertile land), economic opportunities (trade routes), favorable climate (mild temperatures), or social or political stability (peace)
• Helps archaeologists understand the reasons behind past human migrations and their impact on cultural development by providing a framework for interpreting archaeological evidence of migration, such as changes in material culture (pottery styles), settlement patterns (abandoned villages), or skeletal remains (health indicators)

Wave of advance model

• Proposed by Albert Ammerman and Luigi Cavalli-Sforza, explains the gradual spread of agriculture from its origins to neighboring regions
  • Assumes that the spread of agriculture is driven by population growth and expansion, with farmers gradually expanding into new territories, displacing or absorbing hunter-gatherer populations
• Helps explain the Neolithic Revolution and the transition from hunting and gathering to farming by providing a model for the diffusion of agricultural practices (crop cultivation) and technologies (pottery) across different regions
• Allows researchers to estimate the rate and direction of agricultural expansion based on archaeological evidence (plant remains) and genetic evidence (DNA markers)

Types of migration

• Short-distance migration involves the movement of people over relatively short distances, often within the same region or cultural area
  • Driven by factors such as resource availability (seasonal migrations), environmental change (flooding), or social dynamics (marriage)
  • Easier to identify in the archaeological record due to the continuity of material culture (similar pottery styles) and settlement patterns (temporary camps)
• Long-distance migration involves the movement of people over vast distances, often across different regions or cultural boundaries
  • Driven by factors such as climate change (ice ages), population pressure (overcrowding), or the search for new opportunities (colonization)
  • More challenging to identify in the archaeological record due to the potential for cultural discontinuity (new technologies) and the mixing of different material cultures (hybrid artifacts)
• Chain migration occurs when migrants follow the paths of earlier migrants from the same community or region
  • Facilitated by social networks and the exchange of information between migrants and their places of origin (trade routes)
  • Can lead to the establishment of diaspora communities (Greek colonies) and the maintenance of cultural ties across different locations (shared religious practices)

Challenges in archaeological migration evidence

• Distinguishing between migration and other processes, such as trade or cultural diffusion, can be difficult as similar changes in material culture (new pottery styles) or settlement patterns (fortified settlements) may result from different processes
• Preservation bias can lead to the loss or distortion of archaeological evidence of migration due to differential preservation of materials (organic vs. inorganic)
• Determining the exact timing and duration of migration events can be challenging based on archaeological data alone due to limitations in temporal resolution (radiocarbon dating)
• Identifying the origin and destination of migrants requires the use of multiple lines of evidence, such as:
  1. Isotopic analysis (strontium ratios in teeth)
  2. Ancient DNA (genetic markers)
  3. Linguistic reconstructions (loanwords)
• Interpreting the social and cultural context of migration involves understanding the motivations, experiences, and consequences of migration for individuals and communities, as well as reconstructing the interactions between migrants and local populations (acculturation) and their impact on cultural change (hybridization)