15.3 Organizational Designs and Structures

Organizational structures shape how companies operate and adapt to their environments. From rigid hierarchies to flexible networks, each structure has unique advantages and challenges. Understanding these differences is crucial for managers to design effective organizations.

The evolution of structures reflects changing business needs. Traditional hierarchies gave way to divisional and matrix structures, with networked teams now prevalent in dynamic industries. This shift highlights the importance of aligning structure with strategy and environment.

Organizational Structures

Mechanistic vs organic structures

Top images from around the web for Mechanistic vs organic structures

• 

  Organic versus Mechanistic Models | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Organic versus Mechanistic Models | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Common Organizational Structures | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Organic versus Mechanistic Models | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Organic versus Mechanistic Models | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Mechanistic vs organic structures

• 

  Organic versus Mechanistic Models | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Organic versus Mechanistic Models | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Common Organizational Structures | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Organic versus Mechanistic Models | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Organic versus Mechanistic Models | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Mechanistic organizational structures feature high formalization with clear hierarchies and centralized decision-making (military organizations)
  • Well-suited for stable, predictable environments with routine tasks (manufacturing industries)
  • Efficient for large-scale operations and standardized products or services (fast-food chains)
• Organic organizational structures have flexible, decentralized decision-making with less formalization (startups)
  • Thrive in dynamic, rapidly changing environments requiring innovation and adaptability (technology companies)
  • Effective for knowledge-based work and customized products or services (consulting firms)

Evolution of organizational structures

• Traditional hierarchical structures prevalent in the early 20th century (Ford Motor Company)
  • Characterized by clear lines of authority, specialization, and centralized decision-making
  • Suited for stable environments and mass production (assembly line manufacturing)
• Divisional structures emerged in the mid-20th century (General Electric)
  • Organized around distinct product lines, geographical regions, or customer segments
  • Allowed for greater flexibility and responsiveness to specific market needs (international expansion)
• Matrix structures gained popularity in the late 20th century (NASA)
  • Combined functional and project-based reporting lines
  • Facilitated cross-functional collaboration and resource sharing (product development teams)
  • Emerged in response to increasingly complex and dynamic business environments (aerospace industry)
• Networked team structures became prominent in the 21st century (Google)
  • Flat, decentralized structures emphasizing self-managed teams and horizontal collaboration
  • Enabled by advances in information and communication technologies (remote work)
  • Adaptable to rapidly changing, knowledge-intensive industries (software development)

Types of organizational structures

• Functional structures offer advantages such as
  • Efficiency through specialization and economies of scale (shared resources)
  • Clear career paths within functional areas (marketing department)
  • Centralized control and coordination (finance department)
• Functional structures have disadvantages like
  • Limited cross-functional collaboration and communication (silos)
  • Slow response to changes in the external environment (market shifts)
  • Potential for functional silos and suboptimization (departmental goals over organizational goals)
• Divisional structures provide advantages including
  • Adaptability to specific market or customer needs (regional divisions)
  • Decentralized decision-making and faster response times (product divisions)
  • Clear profit and loss responsibility for each division (business units)
• Divisional structures have disadvantages such as
  • Duplication of resources across divisions (separate HR departments)
  • Potential for inter-divisional conflict and competition (resource allocation)
  • Reduced economies of scale compared to functional structures (higher costs)
• Matrix structures offer advantages like
  • Enhanced cross-functional collaboration and knowledge sharing (project teams)
  • Efficient utilization of specialized resources across projects (shared experts)
  • Dual focus on functional expertise and project deliverables (balanced priorities)
• Matrix structures have disadvantages including
  • Potential for role ambiguity and conflict between functional and project managers (dual reporting)
  • Increased complexity and communication overhead (multiple stakeholders)
  • Challenges in maintaining a balance between functional and project priorities (competing demands)
• Networked team structures provide advantages such as
  • High adaptability and responsiveness to change (agile methodologies)
  • Empowerment of employees and decentralized decision-making (autonomous teams)
  • Fostering innovation and creativity through collaboration (diverse perspectives)
• Networked team structures have disadvantages like
  • Potential for lack of accountability and unclear decision-making processes (diffused responsibility)
  • Difficulty in maintaining consistency and standardization across teams (varying practices)
  • Challenges in managing and coordinating multiple teams (communication barriers)

Organizational Design Considerations

• Centralization vs. Decentralization
  • Centralization involves concentrating decision-making authority at higher levels of the organization
  • Decentralization distributes decision-making authority to lower levels, promoting flexibility and responsiveness
• Span of control refers to the number of subordinates a manager directly oversees, impacting organizational hierarchy
• Departmentalization involves grouping jobs into logical units to improve coordination and efficiency (functional, divisional, or matrix structures)
• Organizational culture influences structure by shaping values, norms, and behaviors that affect how work is organized and performed