International political economy explores three main theories: mercantilism , liberalism , and Marxism . Each offers unique perspectives on economic relations, trade, and power dynamics between nations. These theories shape our understanding of global economic systems and policies.
Mercantilism emphasizes state power, while liberalism focuses on free markets and individual freedom. Marxism critiques capitalism and class struggle. These theories have influenced historical events and continue to shape modern economic debates and policies worldwide.
Theoretical Perspectives in International Political Economy
Assumptions of economic theories
Top images from around the web for Assumptions of economic theories Theoretical Perspectives on Society | Introduction to Sociology View original
Is this image relevant?
Political spectrum - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Theoretical Perspectives on Society | Introduction to Sociology View original
Is this image relevant?
Political spectrum - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Assumptions of economic theories Theoretical Perspectives on Society | Introduction to Sociology View original
Is this image relevant?
Political spectrum - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Theoretical Perspectives on Society | Introduction to Sociology View original
Is this image relevant?
Political spectrum - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Mercantilism
State power and wealth are the primary goals of economic activity
International trade is a zero-sum game, with one country's gain being another's loss
Emphasizes maximizing exports and minimizing imports to accumulate gold and silver (bullion)
Liberalism
Individual freedom and private property rights are essential for economic prosperity
Free trade and market forces lead to economic efficiency and growth through specialization
Comparative advantage drives mutually beneficial trade between countries (Ricardo's theory)
Marxism
Class struggle between the bourgeoisie (owners of capital) and the proletariat (workers) defines economic relations
Capitalism leads to exploitation, inequality, and economic crises due to the extraction of surplus value
Historical materialism posits that economic forces shape social and political structures, leading to the inevitable transition to socialism
Applications in international economics
Mercantilism
Historical applications
European colonialism and the rise of nation-states in the 16th-18th centuries (Spanish Empire, British Empire)
Trade rivalries and economic nationalism, such as the Anglo-Dutch Wars
Contemporary applications
Neo-mercantilism in some developing countries, such as China's export-led growth strategy
Strategic trade policies and industrial policy to support domestic industries (subsidies, local content requirements)
Liberalism
Historical applications
Rise of laissez-faire capitalism in the 19th century (British Corn Laws repeal, Cobden-Chevalier Treaty)
Bretton Woods system and the post-World War II economic order (GATT, IMF, World Bank)
Contemporary applications
Neoliberal policies and the Washington Consensus (privatization, deregulation, trade liberalization)
World Trade Organization and regional trade agreements (NAFTA, EU, RCEP)
Marxism
Historical applications
Socialist revolutions in Russia (1917 1917 1917 ), China (1949 1949 1949 ), and other countries
Dependency theory and the critique of imperialism (Prebisch-Singer hypothesis, world-systems theory)
Contemporary applications
Anti-globalization movements and critiques of neoliberalism (World Social Forum, Occupy Wall Street)
Debates on global inequality and the role of multinational corporations in perpetuating uneven development
Strengths and limitations of theories
Mercantilism
Explanatory power
Highlights the role of state power in shaping economic relations and pursuing national interests
Explains the historical roots of economic nationalism and protectionist policies
Limitations
Overlooks the benefits of international trade and specialization based on comparative advantage
Underestimates the importance of market forces and individual incentives in driving economic activity
Liberalism
Explanatory power
Provides a framework for understanding the gains from trade and the benefits of economic integration
Explains the role of comparative advantage in driving economic efficiency and growth
Limitations
Assumes perfect competition and overlooks market failures, such as externalities and information asymmetries
Underestimates the distributional consequences of free trade and the potential for rising inequality
Marxism
Explanatory power
Highlights the structural inequalities and contradictions inherent in the capitalist system
Explains the historical dynamics of class struggle and the tendency towards economic crises
Limitations
Overemphasizes the deterministic role of economic forces in shaping social and political outcomes
Underestimates the adaptability and resilience of capitalism in the face of challenges and reforms
Debates among economic paradigms
Debates between mercantilism and liberalism
Role of the state in the economy: active intervention (mercantilism) vs. limited involvement (liberalism)
Benefits and costs of free trade versus protectionism: economic efficiency (liberalism) vs. national self-sufficiency (mercantilism)
Debates between liberalism and Marxism
Nature of capitalism: engine of growth and prosperity (liberalism) vs. system of exploitation and crisis (Marxism)
Possibility of reforming capitalism (liberalism) versus the need for revolutionary change (Marxism)
Synthesis efforts
Embedded liberalism: combining free trade with domestic social protection (Keynesian welfare state)
Developmental state: strategic state intervention to promote economic growth and industrialization (East Asian model)
Global governance: international cooperation to manage the challenges of globalization (climate change, financial stability)