2.1 Epistemology

Epistemology explores how we know what we know. It examines the nature, sources, and limits of knowledge, delving into questions about what constitutes knowledge and how we acquire it. This field is crucial for understanding the relationship between science and religion.

Epistemology covers various types of knowledge, theories of justification, and sources of knowledge. It also addresses skepticism, limits of knowledge, and religious epistemology. The field extends to scientific epistemology, social epistemology, virtue epistemology, and naturalized approaches to understanding knowledge.

Epistemology overview

• Epistemology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature, sources, and limits of knowledge
• It explores questions such as what constitutes knowledge, how knowledge is acquired, and whether knowledge is possible
• Epistemology is crucial for understanding the relationship between science and religion, as it examines the foundations and justification of beliefs in both domains

Types of knowledge

Propositional knowledge

Top images from around the web for Propositional knowledge

• 

  Storage | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Plato - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Definitions of knowledge - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Storage | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Plato - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Propositional knowledge

• 

  Storage | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Plato - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Definitions of knowledge - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Storage | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Plato - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Propositional knowledge, also known as factual knowledge, refers to knowing that something is the case (knowing that the Earth orbits the Sun)
• It is typically expressed in the form of declarative sentences or propositions
• Propositional knowledge is often contrasted with other types of knowledge, such as procedural knowledge and acquaintance knowledge

Procedural knowledge

• Procedural knowledge involves knowing how to perform a particular skill or activity (riding a bicycle or playing an instrument)
• It is often acquired through practice and experience rather than through explicit instruction
• Procedural knowledge is sometimes referred to as "know-how" and is distinct from propositional knowledge, which is concerned with facts

Acquaintance knowledge

• Acquaintance knowledge involves direct, personal familiarity with a person, place, or thing (knowing the taste of a particular food or the appearance of a friend)
• It is gained through direct experience or encounter rather than through description or inference
• Acquaintance knowledge is often considered a more immediate and intimate form of knowledge compared to propositional or procedural knowledge

Theories of justification

Foundationalism

• Foundationalism holds that knowledge is built upon a foundation of basic beliefs that are justified without reference to other beliefs
• These foundational beliefs are considered self-evident, infallible, or derived from reliable sources (sense perception or rational intuition)
• According to foundationalism, non-basic beliefs are justified by their connection to the foundational beliefs through logical inference or evidence

Coherentism

• Coherentism maintains that beliefs are justified by their coherence with other beliefs in a system
• A belief is considered justified if it fits coherently within a network of mutually supporting beliefs
• Coherentism rejects the idea of foundational beliefs and instead emphasizes the interconnectedness and mutual support among beliefs

Reliabilism

• Reliabilism focuses on the reliability of the processes or methods by which beliefs are formed
• A belief is justified if it is produced by a reliable cognitive process that tends to generate true beliefs (perception under normal conditions or sound reasoning)
• Reliabilism emphasizes the importance of the truth-conduciveness of the belief-forming processes rather than the internal coherence or foundational status of beliefs

Sources of knowledge

Perception

• Perception refers to the acquisition of knowledge through the senses (sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell)
• It involves the direct apprehension of external objects or events and is often considered a primary source of knowledge
• However, the reliability of perception has been questioned due to issues such as perceptual illusions, hallucinations, and the theory-ladenness of observation

Reason

• Reason encompasses the use of logical inference, deduction, and induction to derive knowledge from existing beliefs or premises
• It involves the application of rational principles and the drawing of conclusions based on evidence and argumentation
• Reason is often considered a reliable source of knowledge, particularly in fields such as mathematics and logic

Testimony

• Testimony refers to the acquisition of knowledge through the reports or statements of others
• It involves relying on the expertise, experience, or credibility of other individuals or sources (experts, eyewitnesses, or historical records)
• The reliability of testimony depends on factors such as the trustworthiness of the source, the coherence of the report, and the possibility of independent verification

Intuition

• Intuition involves the immediate apprehension of knowledge without conscious reasoning or inference
• It is often described as a gut feeling or instinctive understanding that arises spontaneously
• The reliability and epistemic status of intuition are subject to debate, with some considering it a valid source of knowledge and others viewing it as subjective and unreliable

Skepticism

Cartesian skepticism

• Cartesian skepticism, named after René Descartes, raises doubts about the reliability of sensory experience and the possibility of knowledge
• Descartes employed methodological doubt, questioning the certainty of his beliefs and seeking to find a secure foundation for knowledge
• He famously argued that even seemingly self-evident beliefs (the existence of the external world) could be doubted, as one might be deceived by an evil demon or dreaming

Pyrrhonian skepticism

• Pyrrhonian skepticism, originating from the Greek philosopher Pyrrho, advocates the suspension of judgment about all beliefs
• It emphasizes the limitations of human knowledge and the equal force of opposing arguments, leading to a state of epoche or withholding of assent
• Pyrrhonian skeptics argue that the suspension of judgment is the path to tranquility and freedom from dogmatism

Limits of knowledge

Gettier problems

• Gettier problems, named after philosopher Edmund Gettier, challenge the traditional definition of knowledge as justified true belief
• Gettier presented scenarios in which a person has a justified true belief but lacks knowledge due to the presence of luck or coincidence
• These problems highlight the need for a more robust account of knowledge that goes beyond mere justified true belief

Closure principle

• The closure principle states that if a person knows a proposition, and that proposition entails another proposition, then the person also knows the entailed proposition
• It suggests that knowledge is closed under known entailment, meaning that one cannot know a proposition without also knowing its logical consequences
• However, some philosophers have challenged the closure principle, arguing that there are cases where knowledge does not transfer through known entailment

Religious epistemology

Faith vs reason

• The relationship between faith and reason is a central concern in religious epistemology
• Some religious traditions emphasize the primacy of faith, viewing it as a source of knowledge that transcends or complements reason
• Others seek to reconcile faith and reason, arguing that they are compatible and mutually reinforcing in the pursuit of religious understanding

Divine revelation

• Divine revelation refers to the idea that knowledge can be directly imparted by a divine being or through sacred texts
• It is often considered a source of religious knowledge that is distinct from human reason or empirical investigation
• The epistemological status of divine revelation is debated, with questions raised about its reliability, interpretation, and relationship to other sources of knowledge

Religious experience

• Religious experience encompasses a wide range of subjective encounters or states (mystical experiences, visions, or a sense of divine presence)
• These experiences are often considered a source of religious knowledge and are used to support belief in the existence of a higher power or spiritual reality
• The epistemic value of religious experiences is contested, with debates about their veridicality, universality, and the possibility of alternative explanations

Epistemology in science

Scientific method

• The scientific method is a systematic approach to acquiring knowledge through empirical observation, hypothesis testing, and experimentation
• It involves formulating testable hypotheses, collecting data, and drawing conclusions based on the evidence
• The scientific method is considered a reliable means of generating knowledge in the natural sciences, although its scope and limitations are subject to philosophical scrutiny

Empiricism vs rationalism

• Empiricism and rationalism are two competing epistemological approaches in the philosophy of science
• Empiricism emphasizes the role of sensory experience and observation in acquiring knowledge, holding that knowledge is primarily derived from empirical evidence
• Rationalism, on the other hand, stresses the importance of reason and a priori knowledge, arguing that some knowledge can be attained independently of sensory experience

Paradigm shifts

• Paradigm shifts, a concept introduced by philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn, refer to major changes in the dominant theoretical framework within a scientific discipline
• These shifts involve a fundamental reorientation of scientific thinking, leading to new research questions, methods, and standards of evidence
• Paradigm shifts highlight the historical and sociological dimensions of scientific knowledge, challenging the view of science as a purely objective and cumulative enterprise

Social epistemology

Collective knowledge

• Collective knowledge refers to the knowledge possessed by a group or community that extends beyond the knowledge of any individual member
• It encompasses shared beliefs, practices, and ways of knowing that are transmitted and sustained through social interaction and cultural institutions
• Social epistemology investigates the processes by which collective knowledge is generated, disseminated, and justified within social contexts

Epistemic injustice

• Epistemic injustice occurs when a person is wronged in their capacity as a knower due to prejudice or systemic marginalization
• It can take the form of testimonial injustice, where a person's credibility is unfairly diminished, or hermeneutical injustice, where a person lacks the conceptual resources to make sense of their experiences
• Epistemic injustice highlights the ways in which power dynamics and social inequalities can shape the production and recognition of knowledge

Standpoint epistemology

• Standpoint epistemology emphasizes the role of social location and identity in shaping knowledge and understanding
• It argues that individuals from marginalized or oppressed groups may have unique epistemic advantages due to their lived experiences and perspectives
• Standpoint epistemology challenges the notion of a neutral, objective knower and highlights the importance of diverse voices and situated knowledge in the pursuit of truth

Virtue epistemology

Intellectual virtues

• Virtue epistemology focuses on the intellectual character traits and dispositions that are conducive to the acquisition of knowledge
• Intellectual virtues (open-mindedness, intellectual humility, intellectual courage, and intellectual perseverance)
• Virtue epistemologists argue that possessing and cultivating these virtues is essential for being a responsible and reliable knower

Epistemic responsibility

• Epistemic responsibility refers to the duties and obligations that individuals have in their pursuit of knowledge
• It involves exercising due diligence in the formation and maintenance of beliefs, being receptive to evidence and counterarguments, and engaging in self-reflection and self-correction
• Epistemic responsibility is closely tied to the notion of intellectual virtues and is considered a key component of epistemic agency and integrity

Naturalized epistemology

Cognitive science

• Naturalized epistemology seeks to understand knowledge and epistemic processes using the methods and findings of the natural sciences
• It draws on insights from cognitive science, which studies the mind and mental processes using empirical and computational approaches
• Naturalized epistemologists aim to provide a scientifically informed account of knowledge acquisition, belief formation, and reasoning, grounding epistemology in the empirical study of cognition

Evolutionary epistemology

• Evolutionary epistemology applies evolutionary principles to the study of knowledge and its development over time
• It views the human cognitive apparatus as the product of evolutionary processes, shaped by natural selection to facilitate survival and reproduction
• Evolutionary epistemologists investigate the adaptive value of epistemic capacities (perception, memory, and reasoning) and the role of cultural evolution in the transmission and refinement of knowledge